Suppr超能文献

一种健康公平科学方法,用于评估 COVID-19 大流行期间 COVID-19 疫苗接种率差异的驱动因素,美国,2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月。

A health equity science approach to assessing drivers of COVID-19 vaccination coverage disparities over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, United States, December 2020-December 2022.

机构信息

Office of the Director, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Office of the Director, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2024 Sep 17;42 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):126158. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126158. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health equity science examines underlying social determinants, or drivers, of health inequities by building an evidence base to guide action across programs, public health surveillance, policy, and communications efforts. A Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was utilized during the COVID-19 response to identify areas where inequities exist and support communities with vaccination. We set out to assess COVID-19 vaccination coverage by two SVI themes, Racial and Ethnicity Minority Status and Housing Type and Transportation to examine disparities.

METHODS

US county-level COVID-19 vaccine administration data among persons aged 5 years and older reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from December 14, 2020 to December 14, 2022, were analyzed. Counties were categorized 1) into tertiles (low, moderate, high) according to each SVI theme's level of vulnerability or 2) dichotomized by urban or rural classification. Primary series vaccination coverage per age group were assessed for SVI social factors by SVI theme tertiles or urbanicity.

RESULTS

Older adults aged 65 years and older had the highest vaccination coverage across all vulnerability factors compared with children aged 5-17 years and adults aged 18-64 years. Overall, children and adults had higher vaccination coverage in counties of high vulnerability. Greater vaccination coverage differences were observed by urbanicity as rural counties had some of the lowest vaccination coverage for children and adults.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 vaccination efforts narrowed gaps in coverage for adults aged 65 years and older but larger vaccination coverage differences remained among younger populations. Moreover, greater disparities in coverage existed in rural counties. Health equity science approaches to analyses should extend beyond identifying differences by basic demographics such as race and ethnicity and include factors that provide context (housing, transportation, age, and geography) to assist with prioritization of vaccination efforts where true disparities in vaccination coverage exist.

摘要

简介

健康公平科学通过建立循证基础来审视健康不公平的潜在社会决定因素或驱动因素,从而指导项目、公共卫生监测、政策和传播工作的行动。在 COVID-19 应对期间,利用社会脆弱性指数 (SVI) 来识别存在不公平的地区,并为疫苗接种提供支持社区。我们着手评估 COVID-19 疫苗接种覆盖率,采用 SVI 的两个主题,种族和族裔少数群体地位以及住房类型和交通,以检查差异。

方法

对 2020 年 12 月 14 日至 2022 年 12 月 14 日期间向疾病控制与预防中心报告的美国县一级 5 岁及以上人群的 COVID-19 疫苗接种数据进行了分析。根据每个 SVI 主题的脆弱性水平,将各县分为 1) 三分位数(低、中、高)或 2) 按城市或农村分类进行二分法。按 SVI 主题三分位数或城市性评估 SVI 社会因素的每个年龄组的初级系列疫苗接种覆盖率。

结果

与 5-17 岁儿童和 18-64 岁成年人相比,所有脆弱性因素中年龄较大的 65 岁及以上成年人的疫苗接种率最高。总体而言,在高脆弱性县,儿童和成年人的疫苗接种率更高。城乡差异越大,农村县的儿童和成年人疫苗接种率就越低。

结论

COVID-19 疫苗接种工作缩小了 65 岁及以上成年人的覆盖差距,但在年轻人群中仍存在更大的疫苗接种差距。此外,农村县的差距更大。健康公平科学的分析方法不应仅限于通过种族和族裔等基本人口统计学识别差异,还应包括提供背景(住房、交通、年龄和地理位置)的因素,以帮助确定真正存在疫苗接种差距的地区的疫苗接种工作的优先级。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Federal Programs.在联邦项目中解决健康的社会决定因素问题。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 1;3(3):e221064. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1064.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验