McRee Bonnie G, Hanson Bridget L, Vendetti Janice, King Diane K, Pawlukiewicz Iwona, Berry Erin, Johnson Jessica, Marshall Deanna, Rosato Lauren, Steinberg Gallucci Karen, Whitmore Corrie
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Apr;46(2):452-460. doi: 10.1177/29767342241267086. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
The increasing prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders is a critical public health issue. Two behaviors, consuming alcohol and using less effective pregnancy prevention, may result in alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) in individuals who can become pregnant. In the context of alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) services, cutoff scores on widely used alcohol risk assessments (eg, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, U.S. version [USAUDIT]) may fail to identify individuals whose relatively low alcohol consumption may still put them at risk for an AEP due to their pregnancy prevention method.
To identify this gap in alcohol SBI service delivery, we examined data from 2 reproductive healthcare systems implementing alcohol SBI, to explore the prevalence of individuals who met both of the following risk conditions: reported any alcohol use on the USAUDIT and a pregnancy prevention method less than 88% effective. Electronic health records for individuals aged 18 to 49 presenting for preventive care in 2021 were analyzed.
Of 11 567 screened, 7638 reported some alcohol use, but screened at a lower-risk level and were not flagged to receive an alcohol-focused brief intervention (BI). Of these, 1477 were using a method of pregnancy prevention that was less than 88% effective. In addition, 118 of the 1676 who screened positive on the USAUDIT were using less effective contraception and did not receive a BI. In summary, the number of individuals at risk of an AEP who did not receive an alcohol BI was 1595 (13.8%) of the total patients screened for at-risk alcohol use.
There is a need for system modifications to assess multiple behaviors simultaneously and alert providers when a combination of behaviors increases a specific health risk, such as an AEP. Tailored alcohol BIs that include the risks/benefits of various pregnancy prevention methods to reduce AEPs provide opportunities to enhance the reach of standard alcohol SBI services.
胎儿酒精谱系障碍患病率的不断上升是一个关键的公共卫生问题。饮酒和采用效果欠佳的避孕措施这两种行为,可能会导致有怀孕能力的个体出现酒精暴露妊娠(AEP)情况。在酒精筛查与简短干预(SBI)服务的背景下,广泛使用的酒精风险评估工具(如酒精使用障碍识别测试美国版[USAUDIT])的临界值分数,可能无法识别出那些饮酒量相对较低但因避孕方式仍有AEP风险的个体。
为了找出酒精SBI服务提供过程中的这一差距,我们研究了2个实施酒精SBI的生殖健康护理系统的数据,以探究同时符合以下两种风险条件的个体的患病率:在USAUDIT上报告有任何饮酒行为,以及采用效果低于88%的避孕方法。对2021年前来接受预防性护理的18至49岁个体的电子健康记录进行了分析。
在11567名接受筛查的个体中,7638人报告有饮酒行为,但筛查出的风险水平较低,未被标记接受以酒精为重点的简短干预(BI)。其中,1477人采用的避孕方法效果低于88%。此外,在USAUDIT上筛查呈阳性的1676人中,有118人采用的避孕措施效果欠佳且未接受BI。总之,未接受酒精BI的AEP风险个体数量占接受高风险饮酒筛查的总患者数的1595人(13.8%)。
需要对系统进行改进,以便同时评估多种行为,并在多种行为组合增加特定健康风险(如AEP)时向医护人员发出警报。量身定制的酒精BI,包括各种避孕方法的风险/益处,以减少AEP,为扩大标准酒精SBI服务的覆盖范围提供了机会。