Wang Xun, Dong Yi, Dong Qiang, Wang David
Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Aug 26;10(4):418-421. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003451.
Mild stroke symptoms are cited as the reason for not using tissue-type plasminogen activator in 29-43% of time-eligible patients. Previous studies suggested that not all of these patients had a good recovery or even survival to hospital discharge. Since then, stroke guidelines worldwide recommended thrombolysis in minor but disabling strokes.Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel was more effective than aspirin alone for reducing subsequent events in patients with minor stroke if started within 24 hours of onset in both CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events) and POINT (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischaemic Stroke) trials. Recently, both PRISMS (The Potential of rtPA for Ischemic Strokes With Mild Symptoms) trial and TEMPO-2 (Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) trial showed that treatment with thrombolysis versus antiplatelet did not increase the likelihood of favourable functional outcome at 90 days among patients with minor non-disabling acute ischaemic strokes. Therefore, a narrative review on thrombolysis for patients with minor strokes from published studies may help practicing clinicians.
在29%-43%符合时间标准的患者中,轻度中风症状被列为不使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的原因。先前的研究表明,并非所有这些患者都能良好康复,甚至无法存活至出院。从那时起,全球范围内的中风指南都推荐对轻度但致残的中风进行溶栓治疗。在CHANCE(急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者的氯吡格雷)试验和POINT(新发性短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性中风的血小板导向抑制)试验中,对于轻度中风患者,如果在发病24小时内开始使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷进行双重抗血小板治疗,比单独使用阿司匹林在减少后续事件方面更有效。最近,PRISMS(轻度症状缺血性中风使用rtPA的潜力)试验和TEMPO-2(替奈普酶与已证实闭塞的轻度缺血性中风的标准治疗对比)试验均表明,对于轻度非致残性急性缺血性中风患者,溶栓治疗与抗血小板治疗相比,在90天时并未增加获得良好功能预后的可能性。因此,对已发表研究中轻度中风患者溶栓治疗的叙述性综述可能会对临床医生有所帮助。