• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗医护专业人员对爱尔兰2015年《辅助决策(能力)法案》的看法。

Palliative care healthcare professionals' perspective on the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 in Ireland.

作者信息

Featherstone Hannah Joan, McQuilllan Regina, Lombard John, Foley Geraldine

机构信息

Palliative Medicine, St Francis Hospice Raheny, Dublin, Ireland

Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2527-e2531. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-005065.

DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-005065
PMID:39097400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671928/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

People receiving end-of-life care often require assistance with decision-making. We aimed to ascertain from the perspective of palliative care healthcare professionals in Ireland, the impact of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 (as amended) in Ireland on their practice for end-of-life care decision-making with patients and family caregivers.

METHODS

A qualitative study comprising focus groups was conducted with 22 healthcare professionals from different healthcare professions. Participants were recruited from a large regional specialist palliative care service in Ireland comprising two hospice sites. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants reported uncertainty about the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 (as amended) and emphasised a need for more public education to avoid misinterpretation of the Act. Participants felt that patients who need assistance with decision-making should be autonomous in decision-making but expressed concerns when patients made decisions about care that participants considered unwise. Participants considered that the Act would be beneficial in situations to support early communication between patients and their family caregivers about patient preferences for care.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger scale multicentre examination of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act among specialist palliative care providers in Ireland is needed to better understand its utility for practice.

摘要

目标

接受临终关怀的患者往往需要决策方面的协助。我们旨在从爱尔兰姑息治疗医护专业人员的角度,确定2015年《辅助决策(能力)法》(经修订)对他们在为患者及家庭护理人员进行临终关怀决策时的实践产生的影响。

方法

对来自不同医疗行业的22名医护专业人员进行了一项包含焦点小组的定性研究。参与者从爱尔兰一个大型地区专科姑息治疗服务机构招募,该机构包括两个临终关怀场所。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

参与者表示对2015年《辅助决策(能力)法》(经修订)存在不确定性,并强调需要更多公众教育以避免对该法的误解。参与者认为,需要决策协助的患者在决策时应具有自主性,但当患者做出参与者认为不明智的护理决策时,他们表达了担忧。参与者认为该法在支持患者及其家庭护理人员就患者的护理偏好进行早期沟通的情况下会有所帮助。

结论

需要在爱尔兰的专科姑息治疗提供者中对《辅助决策(能力)法》进行更大规模的多中心研究,以更好地了解其在实践中的效用。

相似文献

1
Palliative care healthcare professionals' perspective on the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 in Ireland.姑息治疗医护专业人员对爱尔兰2015年《辅助决策(能力)法案》的看法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2527-e2531. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-005065.
2
Healthcare Professionals' Perspective on Supporting Patients and Family Caregivers in End-Of-Life Care Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.医疗保健专业人员对在临终护理决策中支持患者及家庭照顾者的看法:一项专科姑息治疗的定性研究
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 1:10499091241296860. doi: 10.1177/10499091241296860.
3
The experience of palliative care service provision for people with non-malignant respiratory disease and their family carers: An all-Ireland qualitative study.非恶性呼吸道疾病患者及其家庭照顾者的姑息治疗服务体验:全爱尔兰定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):383-394. doi: 10.1111/jan.13453. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
Shared decision-making at the end of life: A focus group study exploring the perceptions and experiences of multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals working in the home setting.生命末期的共同决策:一项探索家庭环境中多学科医疗保健专业人员的看法和经验的焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734434. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
How do Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers Accommodate One Another in Decision-Making? Findings From a Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在决策过程中如何相互适应?一项专科姑息治疗定性研究的结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 May;42(5):452-458. doi: 10.1177/10499091241255117. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
"Starting to think that way from the start": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.“从一开始就那样想”:对接受姑息治疗的人群进行逐渐减药决策——对医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探索。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 6;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2.
8
Health Professionals Perceived Concerns and Challenges in Providing Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Qualitative Analysis.医疗专业人员在提供姑息治疗和临终关怀方面所感知到的担忧与挑战:一项定性分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Apr;36(4):308-315. doi: 10.1177/1049909118812193. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
9
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
10
Service user perspectives on palliative care education for health and social care professionals supporting people with learning disabilities.服务使用者对为支持学习障碍人士的健康和社会护理专业人员开展姑息治疗教育的看法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(5):531-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000615. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-life decision-making in the emergency department and intensive care unit: Health professionals' perspectives on and knowledge of the law in Queensland.急诊科和重症监护病房的临终决策:昆士兰州卫生专业人员对法律的看法和了解。
Emerg Med Australas. 2024 Jun;36(3):429-435. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14377. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Comprehension and Decision-Making Capacity Questionnaire About Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Study.姑息治疗和预先医疗指示理解及决策能力问卷:德尔菲研究。
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jan;38(1):41-51. doi: 10.1177/08258597221128676. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
3
The changing face of Capacity legislation in Ireland: algorithms for clinicians.爱尔兰能力立法的变化面貌:临床医生的算法。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2023 Jun;40(2):109-113. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2020.7. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
Advance care planning and palliative care in ACHD: the healthcare providers' perspective.先瞻性医疗计划和缓和医疗在成人先天性心脏病患者中的应用:医疗服务提供者的视角。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):402-408. doi: 10.1017/S1047951120000219. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.英格兰和威尔士的医疗保健专业人员对涉及无行为能力成年人的研究的立法的理解:一项全国性调查。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;44(9):632-637. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104722. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Patient autonomy and advance care planning: a qualitative study of oncologist and palliative care physicians' perspectives.患者自主性和预先医疗指令:对肿瘤学家和姑息治疗医生观点的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):565-574. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3867-5. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Dying for Advice: Code Status Discussions between Resident Physicians and Patients with Advanced Cancer--A National Survey.渴望建议:住院医师与晚期癌症患者之间关于医疗状态的讨论——一项全国性调查
J Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;18(6):535-41. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0373.
8
Supported decision making: a review of the international literature.支持性决策制定:国际文献综述
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;38:61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
Palliative care health professionals' experiences of caring for patients with advance care directives.姑息治疗医护人员对照顾有预立医疗指示患者的体验。
Aust Health Rev. 2015 Apr;39(2):154-159. doi: 10.1071/AH14119.
10
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?提高定性研究严谨性的清单:是本末倒置吗?
BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1115-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.