Lattal Kennon A, Miles Amanda K
Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040 USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 May 15;47(2):315-334. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00408-2. eCollection 2024 Jun.
This is a review of the relation between operant response resurgence and behavioral contrast. Both are defined by rate changes in a target response as a function of environmental changes spatially or temporally distal to the location of the target response. The typical procedures for investigating these two phenomena differ in that (1) resurgence is studied using concurrent schedules and behavioral contrast predominantly with multiple schedules and (2) resurgence is assessed against an extinction baseline of the target response and behavioral contrast has been assessed under a variety of reinforcement schedules. The distinctions between concurrent and multiple schedules, however, may be ones of degree rather than kind. Research into both phenomena reveals considerable overlap in the controlling variables of the two. With certain caveats, resurgence appears to be an instance of behavioral contrast measured against an extinction baseline. Because of Point 2 above, most instances of behavioral contrast do not meet the definition of resurgence. Investigating resurgence while maintaining target responding by a schedule of reinforcement might be useful, but such a procedure would not qualify as resurgence because it violates the definition of resurgence as the return of a previously reinforced but currently extinguished response. Several implications of the similarities and differences between the two are discussed.
这是一篇关于操作性反应恢复与行为对比之间关系的综述。两者均由目标反应的速率变化来定义,该变化是目标反应位置在空间或时间上远端的环境变化的函数。研究这两种现象的典型程序的不同之处在于:(1)恢复使用并发程序进行研究,而行为对比主要使用多重程序进行研究;(2)恢复是根据目标反应的消退基线进行评估的,而行为对比是在各种强化程序下进行评估的。然而,并发程序和多重程序之间的区别可能只是程度上的而非本质上的。对这两种现象的研究表明,两者的控制变量有相当大的重叠。在某些条件下,恢复似乎是根据消退基线测量的行为对比的一个实例。由于上述第2点,行为对比的大多数实例不符合恢复的定义。在通过强化程序维持目标反应的同时研究恢复可能是有用的,但这样的程序不符合恢复的定义,因为它违反了恢复是先前得到强化但当前已消退的反应的重现这一定义。文中讨论了两者异同的若干影响。