• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教程:静脉血栓栓塞症临床预测研究中的注意事项

Tutorial: dos and don'ts in clinical prediction research for venous thromboembolism.

作者信息

Nemeth Banne, Smeets Mark J R, Cannegieter Suzanne C, van Smeden Maarten

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Jun 18;8(4):102480. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102480. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102480
PMID:39099799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11295571/
Abstract

Clinical prediction modeling has become an increasingly popular domain of venous thromboembolism research in recent years. Prediction models can help healthcare providers make decisions regarding starting or withholding therapeutic interventions, or referrals for further diagnostic workup, and can form a basis for risk stratification in clinical trials. The aim of the current guide is to assist in the practical application of complicated methodological requirements for well-performed prediction research by presenting key dos and don'ts while expanding the understanding of predictive research in general for (clinical) researchers who are not specifically trained in the topic; throughout we will use prognostic venous thromboembolism scores as an exemplar.

摘要

近年来,临床预测模型已成为静脉血栓栓塞研究中越来越受欢迎的领域。预测模型可以帮助医疗保健提供者做出关于开始或停止治疗干预、或转诊进行进一步诊断检查的决策,并可为临床试验中的风险分层奠定基础。本指南的目的是通过介绍关键的注意事项,协助将复杂的方法学要求实际应用于高质量的预测研究,同时扩大对预测研究的总体理解,面向那些未接受过该主题专门培训的(临床)研究人员;在整个过程中,我们将使用静脉血栓栓塞预后评分作为示例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efa/11295571/cef55e2c777f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efa/11295571/03e943a749fa/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efa/11295571/cef55e2c777f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efa/11295571/03e943a749fa/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efa/11295571/cef55e2c777f/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Tutorial: dos and don'ts in clinical prediction research for venous thromboembolism.教程:静脉血栓栓塞症临床预测研究中的注意事项
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Jun 18;8(4):102480. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102480. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Publication in otology and neuro-otology: dos and don'ts.耳科学与神经耳科学领域的论文发表:注意事项
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005 May;34(4):281-4.
3
Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation.首次特发性静脉血栓栓塞症治疗后静脉血栓栓塞症复发风险的预测:系统评价、预后模型与临床决策规则以及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(12):i-xxxiii, 1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta20120.
4
Development and validation of risk prediction algorithm (QThrombosis) to estimate future risk of venous thromboembolism: prospective cohort study.开发和验证风险预测算法(QThrombosis)以估计静脉血栓栓塞的未来风险:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Aug 16;343:d4656. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4656.
5
Management of lung cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic: dos, don'ts and don't knows.COVID-19大流行期间肺癌患者的管理:注意事项与未知情况
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2022;3(3):321-336. doi: 10.37349/etat.2022.00085. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
6
Coronary artery calcium testing: dos and don'ts.冠状动脉钙检测:注意事项。
Cardiol Clin. 2012 Feb;30(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
7
Dos and don'ts tutorial for sample alignment in sum frequency generation spectroscopy.和频产生光谱中样品对准的注意事项教程
Biointerphases. 2022 May 12;17(3):031203. doi: 10.1116/6.0001851.
8
Guidelines: The do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education.指南:医学教育中临床技能直接观察的注意事项、禁忌事项及未知事项。
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Oct;6(5):286-305. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7.
9
Dos and Don'ts of Venous Accidents Around the Vein of Galen.大脑大静脉周围静脉意外的注意事项
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):268-269. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.203821.
10
Systematic review of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism following joint replacement.关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞风险预测评分的系统评价。
Thromb Res. 2018 Aug;168:148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower early mortality and risk prediction improvement of obesity after acute pulmonary embolism: results from a multicenter cohort analysis with external validation.急性肺栓塞后肥胖患者早期死亡率降低及风险预测改善:一项多中心队列分析及外部验证结果
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Feb 28;9(2):102718. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102718. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
There is no such thing as a validated prediction model.没有经过验证的预测模型这种东西。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02779-w.
2
Handling missing data in clinical research.临床研究中缺失数据的处理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:185-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
3
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.具有二元结局的临床预测模型外部验证的最小样本量
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4230-4251. doi: 10.1002/sim.9025. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.
5
Untapped potential of multicenter studies: a review of cardiovascular risk prediction models revealed inappropriate analyses and wide variation in reporting.多中心研究的未开发潜力:对心血管风险预测模型的综述揭示了分析不当和报告差异巨大的问题。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Feb 22;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0046-9. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluating the impact of prediction models: lessons learned, challenges, and recommendations.评估预测模型的影响:经验教训、挑战及建议。
Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Jun 12;2:11. doi: 10.1186/s41512-018-0033-6. eCollection 2018.
7
Guide to presenting clinical prediction models for use in clinical settings.临床环境中使用的临床预测模型呈现指南。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 17;365:l737. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l737.
8
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.多分类逻辑回归预测模型的样本量考虑因素和预测性能。
Stat Med. 2019 Apr 30;38(9):1601-1619. doi: 10.1002/sim.8063. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
10
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.