Van Citters R L, Bauer C B, Christopherson L K, Eberhart R C, Eddy D M, Frye R L, Jonsen A R, Keller K H, Levine R J, McGoon D C
Artif Organs. 1985 Nov;9(4):375-415. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1985.tb04402.x.
A Working Group appointed by the Director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHBLI) has reviewed the current status of mechanical circulatory support systems (MCSS), and has examined the potential need for such devices, their cost, and certain societal and ethical issues related to their use. The media have reported the limited clinical investigative use of pneumatically energized total artificial hearts (which actually replace the patient's heart) and left ventricular assist devices (which support or replace the function of the left ventricle by pumping blood from the left heart to the aorta with the patient's heart in place). However, electrically energized systems, which will allow full implantation, permit relatively normal everyday activity, and involve battery exchange or recharge two or three times a day, are currently approaching long-term validation in animals prior to clinical testing. Such long-term left ventricular assist devices have been the primary goal of the NHLBI targeted artificial heart program. Although the ventricular assist device is regarded as an important step in the sequence of MCSS development, the Working Group believes that a fully implantable, long-term, total artificial heart will be a clinical necessity and recommends that the mission of the targeted program include the development of such systems. Past estimates of the potential usage of artificial hearts have been reviewed in the context of advances in medical care and in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. In addition, a retrospective analysis of needs was carried out within a defined population. The resulting projection of 17,000-35,000 cases annually, in patients below age 70, falls within the general range of earlier estimates, but is highly sensitive to many variables. In the absence of an actual base of data and experience with MCSS, projection of costs and prognoses was carried out using explicit sets of assumptions. The total cost of a left ventricular assist device, its implantation and maintenance for a projected average of 4 1/2 years of survival might be approximately $150,000 (in 1983 dollars). The gross annual cost to society could fall in the range of $2.5-$5 billion. Ethical issues associated with use of the artificial heart are not unique. For individual patients these relate primarily to risk-benefit, informed consent, patient selection, and privacy. However, for society as a whole, the larger concern relates to the distribution of national resources.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHBLI)所长任命的一个工作组审查了机械循环支持系统(MCSS)的现状,并研究了对此类设备的潜在需求、成本以及与使用相关的某些社会和伦理问题。媒体报道了气动驱动的全人工心脏(实际上替代患者心脏)和左心室辅助装置(在患者心脏仍在原位的情况下,通过将左心的血液泵入主动脉来支持或替代左心室的功能)在临床研究中的有限应用。然而,电动系统将允许完全植入,使患者能进行相对正常的日常活动,且每天需要进行两到三次电池更换或充电,目前正接近在动物身上进行长期验证,之后才会进行临床试验。这种长期左心室辅助装置一直是NHLBI目标人工心脏项目的主要目标。尽管心室辅助装置被视为MCSS发展进程中的重要一步,但工作组认为,完全可植入的、长期的全人工心脏将是临床必需的,并建议目标项目的任务包括开发此类系统。已结合医疗护理进展和心血管疾病预防情况,对过去关于人工心脏潜在使用量的估计进行了审查。此外,还在特定人群中进行了需求的回顾性分析。结果显示,每年70岁以下患者的使用量预计为17000 - 35000例,这一数字落在早期估计的大致范围内,但对许多变量高度敏感。在缺乏MCSS实际数据和经验基础的情况下,使用明确的假设集对成本和预后进行了预测。左心室辅助装置及其植入和维护的总成本(预计平均存活4.5年)可能约为15万美元(按1983年美元计算)。每年社会总成本可能在25亿至50亿美元之间。与人工心脏使用相关的伦理问题并非独一无二。对于个体患者而言,这些问题主要涉及风险效益、知情同意、患者选择和隐私。然而,对于整个社会来说,更大的担忧在于国家资源的分配。(摘要截选至400字)