Ghosh Abhishek, Mahintamani Tathagata, Somani Aditya, Mukherjee Diptadhi, Padhy Susanta, Khanra Sourav, Arya Sidharth, Suthar Navratan, Prasad Sambhu, Haokip Hoeineiting Rebecca, Guin Aparajita, Rina Kumari, Basu Aniruddha, Mishra Shree, Das Basudeb, Gupta Rajiv, Singh Lokesh Kumar, Nebhinani Naresh, Kumar Pankaj, Kaur Ramandeep, Basu Debasish
Department of Psychiatry, Drug De-addiction and Treatment Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Addiction Medicine, Lokopriya Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur, Assam, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;66(6):528-537. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_123_24. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Substance use disorders (SUDs) are among the leading causes of morbidity in the population. In low- and medium-income countries like India, there is a wide treatment gap for SUD. A multicentric study on the care pathways for SUD in India can help to understand service provision, service utilization, and challenges to improve existing SUD care in India.
We aimed to map pathways to care in SUD. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients who first consulted specialized services versus other medical services.
This was a cross-sectional study of consecutive, consenting adults (18-65 years) with SUD registered to each of the nine participating addiction treatment services distributed across five Indian regions. We adapted the World Health Organization's pathway encounter form.
Of the 998 participants, 98% were males, 49.4% were rural, and 20% were indigenous population. Addiction services dominated initial (50%) and subsequent (60%) healthcare contacts. One in five contacted private for-profit healthcare. Primary care contact was rare (5/998). Diverse approaches included traditional healers (4-6%) and self-medication (2-8%). There was a 3-year delay in first contact; younger, educated individuals with opioid dependence preferred specialized services.
There is a need to strengthen public healthcare infrastructure and delivery systems and integrate SUD treatment into public healthcare.
物质使用障碍(SUDs)是人群发病的主要原因之一。在印度等低收入和中等收入国家,SUD的治疗差距很大。一项关于印度SUD护理途径的多中心研究有助于了解服务提供、服务利用以及改善印度现有SUD护理的挑战。
我们旨在绘制SUD的护理途径。我们比较了首次咨询专科服务的患者与其他医疗服务患者的临床和人口统计学特征。
这是一项横断面研究,研究对象为连续的、同意参与的18至65岁患有SUD的成年人,他们在分布于印度五个地区的九家参与成瘾治疗服务机构中登记。我们采用了世界卫生组织的途径接触表格。
在998名参与者中,98%为男性,49.4%来自农村,20%为原住民。成瘾服务主导了初始(50%)和后续(60%)的医疗接触。五分之一的人联系了私立营利性医疗保健机构。初级保健接触很少见(5/998)。不同的途径包括传统治疗师(4 - 6%)和自我用药(2 - 8%)。首次接触有3年的延迟;年轻、受过教育且患有阿片类药物依赖的人更喜欢专科服务。
有必要加强公共医疗基础设施和服务提供系统,并将SUD治疗纳入公共医疗保健。