Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 1;6(8):e1138. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001138. eCollection 2024 Aug.
To identify interprofessional staffing pattern clusters used in U.S. ICUs.
Latent class analysis.
Adult U.S. ICUs.
None.
None.
We used data from a staffing survey that queried respondents ( = 596 ICUs) on provider (intensivist and nonintensivist), nursing, respiratory therapist, and clinical pharmacist availability and roles. We used latent class analysis to identify clusters describing interprofessional staffing patterns and then compared ICU and hospital characteristics across clusters.
We identified three clusters as optimal. Most ICUs (54.2%) were in cluster 1 ("higher overall staffing") characterized by a higher likelihood of good provider coverage (both intensivist [onsite 24 hr/d] and nonintensivist [orders placed by ICU team exclusively, presence of advanced practice providers, and physicians-in-training]), nursing leadership (presence of charge nurse, nurse educators, and managers), and bedside nursing support (nurses with registered nursing degrees, fewer patients per nurse, and nursing aide availability). One-third (33.7%) were in cluster 2 ("lower intensivist coverage & nursing leadership, higher bedside nursing support") and 12.1% were in cluster 3 ("higher provider coverage & nursing leadership, lower bedside nursing support"). Clinical pharmacists were more common in cluster 1 (99.4%), but present in greater than 85% of all ICUs; respiratory therapists were nearly universal. Cluster 1 ICUs were larger (median 20 beds vs. 15 and 17 in clusters 2 and 3, respectively; < 0.001), and in larger (> 250 beds: 80.6% vs. 66.1% and 48.5%; < 0.001), not-for-profit (75.9% vs. 69.4% and 60.3%; < 0.001) hospitals. Telemedicine use 24 hr/d was more common in cluster 3 units (71.8% vs. 11.7% and 14.1%; < 0.001).
More than half of U.S. ICUs had higher staffing overall. Others tended to have either higher provider presence and nursing leadership or higher bedside nursing support, but not both.
确定美国 ICU 使用的跨专业人员配置模式群。
潜在类别分析。
美国成人 ICU。
无。
无。
我们使用了一项人员配备调查的数据,该调查询问了(=596 个 ICU)受访者提供人员(重症监护医生和非重症监护医生)、护理、呼吸治疗师和临床药师的可用性和角色。我们使用潜在类别分析来确定描述跨专业人员配备模式的集群,然后比较集群之间的 ICU 和医院特征。
我们确定了三个最佳集群。大多数 ICU(54.2%)位于集群 1(“整体人员配备较高”),其特点是提供人员的可能性更高(包括重症监护医生[24 小时/天现场]和非重症监护医生[由 ICU 团队独家下达医嘱、存在高级实践提供者和住院医师]、护理领导(有值班护士、护士教育者和经理)和床边护理支持(有注册护士学位的护士、每位护士的患者较少和护理助手的可用性)。三分之一(33.7%)位于集群 2(“较低的重症监护医生覆盖范围和护理领导,较高的床边护理支持”),12.1%位于集群 3(“较高的提供人员覆盖范围和护理领导,较低的床边护理支持”)。临床药师在集群 1 中更为常见(99.4%),但在所有 ICU 中均超过 85%;呼吸治疗师几乎无处不在。集群 1 的 ICU 更大(中位数 20 张床,而集群 2 和 3 分别为 15 张和 17 张床;<0.001),且在更大(>250 张床:80.6%对 66.1%和 48.5%;<0.001)、非营利(75.9%对 69.4%和 60.3%;<0.001)医院中更为常见。集群 3 单位的 24 小时/天远程医疗使用率更高(71.8%对 11.7%和 14.1%;<0.001)。
超过一半的美国 ICU 的整体人员配备更高。其他 ICU 则倾向于提供更高的人员配备和护理领导,或者提供更高的床边护理支持,但不能两者兼得。