Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI.
Chest. 2021 Aug;160(2):519-528. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
The COVID-19 pandemic placed considerable strain on critical care resources. How US hospitals responded to this crisis is unknown.
What actions did US hospitals take to prepare for a potential surge in demand for critical care services in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic?
From September to November 2020, the chief nursing officers of a representative sample of US hospitals were surveyed regarding organizational actions taken to increase or maintain critical care capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Weighted proportions of hospitals for each potential action were calculated to create estimates across the entire population of US hospitals, accounting for both the sampling strategy and nonresponse. Also examined was whether the types of actions taken varied according to the cumulative regional incidence of COVID-19 cases.
Responses were received from 169 of 540 surveyed US hospitals (response rate, 31.3%). Almost all hospitals canceled or postponed elective surgeries (96.7%) and nonsurgical procedures (94.8%). Few hospitals created new medical units in areas not typically dedicated to health care (12.9%), and almost none adopted triage protocols (5.6%) or protocols to connect multiple patients to a single ventilator (4.8%). Actions to increase or preserve ICU staff, including use of ICU telemedicine, were highly variable, without any single dominant strategy. Hospitals experiencing a higher incidence of COVID-19 did not consistently take different actions compared with hospitals facing lower incidence.
Responses of hospitals to the mass need for critical care services due to the COVID-19 pandemic were highly variable. Most hospitals canceled procedures to preserve ICU capacity and scaled up ICU capacity using existing clinical space and staffing. Future research linking hospital response to patient outcomes can inform planning for additional surges of this pandemic or other events in the future.
COVID-19 大流行给重症监护资源带来了巨大压力。美国医院对此危机的反应尚不清楚。
在美国 COVID-19 大流行背景下,为应对对重症监护服务需求的潜在激增,美国医院采取了哪些行动来做准备?
2020 年 9 月至 11 月,对美国代表性样本医院的首席护理官进行了调查,询问他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间为增加或维持重症监护能力而采取的组织行动。为了在整个美国医院人群中创建估计值,计算了每种潜在行动的医院加权比例,同时考虑了抽样策略和无应答情况。还检查了采取的行动类型是否根据 COVID-19 病例的累积区域发生率而有所不同。
对 540 家接受调查的美国医院中的 169 家(应答率为 31.3%)做出了回应。几乎所有医院都取消或推迟了择期手术(96.7%)和非手术程序(94.8%)。很少有医院在通常不用于医疗保健的区域创建新的医疗单位(12.9%),几乎没有医院采用分诊协议(5.6%)或将多个患者连接到单个呼吸机的协议(4.8%)。增加或保留 ICU 工作人员的行动,包括使用 ICU 远程医疗,差异很大,没有任何单一的主导策略。与面临较低发病率的医院相比,COVID-19 发病率较高的医院并没有始终采取不同的行动。
医院对 COVID-19 大流行期间大量重症监护服务需求的反应差异很大。大多数医院取消了手术以保留 ICU 容量,并利用现有临床空间和人员配备扩大了 ICU 容量。未来将医院反应与患者结果联系起来的研究可以为应对本次大流行或未来其他事件的进一步激增提供规划信息。