Suppr超能文献

氧化还原电位对男性不育症的诊断价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic value of oxidation-reduction potential for male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tan Yangyang, Yuan Yacheng, Yang Xukai, Wang Yong, Liu Linhai

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, China.

The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):1228-1238. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-32. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the last few years, studies have initially confirmed the diagnostic significance of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in male infertility patients. In this article, we used meta-analysis to clarify the role of ORP in the diagnosis of male infertility.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched by computer for relevant published literature. Quality assessment of the included literature was performed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) scale. Heterogeneity analysis of included studies was conducted using Metadisc 1.4 and Stata 12.0, and effective models for quantitative synthesis were selected based on heterogeneity results; the sensitivity and specificity of the synthesis were obtained using the software, and in order to reduce the effects of heterogeneity and thresholds, the information of sensitivity and specificity was integrated. We used the subject receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC) and Q* index for comprehensive evaluation.

RESULTS

Seven papers were eventually included in the study, and the results showed that ORP had a sensitivity of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.82] and specificity of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63-0.69), an AUC of 0.8 and a Q* index of 0.74 for the diagnosis of male infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

ORP has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing male infertility.

摘要

背景

在过去几年中,研究初步证实了氧化还原电位(ORP)在男性不育患者中的诊断意义。在本文中,我们采用荟萃分析来阐明ORP在男性不育诊断中的作用。

方法

通过计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆,查找相关的已发表文献。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)量表对纳入文献进行质量评估。使用Metadisc 1.4和Stata 12.0对纳入研究进行异质性分析,并根据异质性结果选择有效的定量合成模型;使用该软件获得合成的敏感性和特异性,为减少异质性和阈值的影响,整合敏感性和特异性信息。我们使用受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线、曲线下面积(AUC)和Q*指数进行综合评估。

结果

最终纳入7篇论文,结果显示ORP诊断男性不育的敏感性为0.81[95%置信区间(CI):0.80 - 0.82],特异性为0.66(95%CI:0.63 - 0.69),AUC为0.8,Q*指数为0.74。

结论

ORP对男性不育的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50d/11291403/e37a84cea835/tau-13-07-1228-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验