Suppr超能文献

急救电话呼叫与全科医生请求的救护车——患者死亡率、疾病严重程度及模式

Emergency Call versus General Practitioner Requested Ambulances - Patient Mortality, Disease Severity and Pattern.

作者信息

Søvsø Morten Breinholt, Haurum Rasmine Birch, Ebbesen Trine Hagelskær, Rasmussen Ann Øster, Ward Logan Morgan, Mogensen Mads Lause, Christensen Erika Frischknecht, Lindskou Tim Alex

机构信息

Centre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research; Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.

Department of Health, Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul 30;16:513-523. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S469430. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ambulance requests by general practitioners for primary care patients (GP-requested) are often omitted in studies on increased demand within emergency care but may comprise a substantial patient group. We aimed to assess acute severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and diagnostic pattern, including comorbidity, and mortality among GP-requested ambulance patients, compared to emergency call ambulance patients. Our hypothesis was that emergency call patients had more severe health issues than GP-requested ambulance patients.

METHODS

Historic population-based cohort study of ambulance patients in the North Denmark Region, 2016-2020. Hospital contact data including diagnoses, ambulance data, vital signs and vital status was linked using each patient's unique identification number. Primary outcome measure was mortality within 1, 7, and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were disease severity expressed as modified National Early Warning Score (NEWS2), and ICU admission. Admission status and hospital diagnostic pattern, including comorbidity were described and compared.

RESULTS

We included 255,487 patients. GP-requested patients (N = 119,361, 46.7%) were older (median years [IQR] 73 [58-83] versus 61 [37-76]) and more had moderate/severe comorbidity (11.9%, N = 13,806 versus 4.9%, N = 6145) than the emergency call patients. Prehospital mNEWS2 median scores were lower for GP-requested patients. For both groups, mNEWS2 was highest among patients aged 66+. GP-requested patients had higher 30-day mortality (9.0% (95% CI: 8.8-9.2), N = 8996) than emergency call patients (5.2% (95% CI: 5.1-5.4), N = 6727). Circulatory (12.0%, 11,695/97,112) and respiratory diseases (11.6%, 11,219/97,112) were more frequent among GP-requested patients than emergency call patients ((10.7%, 12,640/118,102) and (5.8%, 6858/118,102)). The highest number of deaths was found for health issues 'circulatory diseases' in the emergency call group and 'other factors' followed by "respiratory diseases" in the GP-requested group.

CONCLUSION

GP-requested patients constituted nearly half of the EMS volume, they were older, with more comorbidity, had serious conditions with substantial acute severity, and a higher 30-day mortality than emergency call patients.

摘要

引言

在关于急诊需求增加的研究中,全科医生为初级保健患者请求救护车(全科医生请求)的情况常常被忽略,但这可能涵盖了相当大的患者群体。我们旨在评估全科医生请求救护车的患者与急救电话救护车患者相比的急性严重程度、重症监护病房(ICU)入院情况、诊断模式(包括合并症)以及死亡率。我们的假设是,急救电话患者的健康问题比全科医生请求救护车的患者更严重。

方法

对2016 - 2020年丹麦北部地区基于人群的救护车患者进行历史性队列研究。利用每个患者的唯一识别号码将包括诊断、救护车数据、生命体征和生命状态的医院接触数据进行关联。主要结局指标是1天、7天和30天内的死亡率。次要结局是用改良的国家早期预警评分(NEWS2)表示的疾病严重程度以及ICU入院情况。描述并比较了入院状态和医院诊断模式(包括合并症)。

结果

我们纳入了255,487名患者。与急救电话患者相比,全科医生请求的患者(N = 119,361,占46.7%)年龄更大(中位数年龄[四分位间距]73岁[58 - 83岁],而急救电话患者为61岁[37 - 76岁])且合并中/重度疾病的比例更高(分别为11.9%,N = 13,806和4.9%,N = 6145)。全科医生请求的患者院前mNEWS2中位数得分更低。两组中,66岁以上患者的mNEWS2得分最高。全科医生请求的患者30天死亡率(9.0%(95%置信区间:8.8 - 9.2),N = 8996)高于急救电话患者(5.2%(95%置信区间:5.1 - 5.4),N = 6727)。与急救电话患者相比,全科医生请求的患者中循环系统疾病(12.0%,11,695/97,112)和呼吸系统疾病(11.6%,11,219/97,112)更为常见(急救电话患者分别为10.7%,12,640/118,102和5.8%,6858/118,102)。在急救电话组中,“循环系统疾病”健康问题导致的死亡人数最多,而在全科医生请求组中,“其他因素”导致的死亡人数最多,其次是“呼吸系统疾病”。

结论

全科医生请求的患者占紧急医疗服务量的近一半,他们年龄更大,合并症更多,病情严重,急性严重程度较高,30天死亡率高于急救电话患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/11297546/e9ef3c0664c0/CLEP-16-513-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验