Poulsen Ninna Rysholt, Kløjgård Torben Anders, Lübcke Kenneth, Lindskou Tim Alex, Søvsø Morten Breinholt, Christensen Erika Frischknecht
Dan Med J. 2020 Feb;67(2).
In 2006, the North Denmark Region implemented the electronic prehospital patient medical record (PPR), amPHI, in the region's prehospital emergency medical service. In 2015, a new nationwide version was implemented. Our aim was to investigate the completeness and correctness of registrations of vital sign data in the PPR after the initial introduction and after the implementation of the new PPR version.
METHODS: This was a descriptive registry-based study including patients to whom an ambulance was dispatched after an emergency call in the North Denmark Region in the periods 2007-2014 and 2016-2017. We examined vital sign data defined as blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. We defined incorrect vital sign values according to clinical plausibility. We used a trend analysis and Pearson's χ2.
We included 253,169 PPRs. The proportion of PPR with registration of vital signs from 2007-2014 compared with 2016-2017 was BP: 73-86%, 81-82%; HR: 76-88%, 82-83%; SpO2: 72-85%, 82-83%; RR: 34-82%, 77-79%; GCS score: 54-92%, 81-84%; NRS for pain: 0-16%, 24-26%. The increase from 2007-2014 and 2016-2017 was significant as were the differences between 2014 and 2016. We found few defined outliers (0.5%).
The completeness of registration increased gradually but decreased slightly after implementation of the new version. A high completeness combined with few implausible outliers and concordance indicate correctness of the vital sign registrations.
none.
Approval for the use of data was given by the medical director of the Emergency Medical Services, the North Denmark Region.
2006年,丹麦北部地区在其院前急救医疗服务中实施了电子院前患者病历(PPR),即amPHI。2015年,实施了新的全国版本。我们的目的是调查在首次引入PPR以及新PPR版本实施后,PPR中生命体征数据登记的完整性和正确性。
这是一项基于登记处的描述性研究,纳入了2007 - 2014年以及2016 - 2017年丹麦北部地区在紧急呼叫后派遣救护车的患者。我们检查了定义为血压(BP)、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率(RR)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分和疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)的生命体征数据。我们根据临床合理性定义了不正确的生命体征值。我们使用了趋势分析和Pearson卡方检验。
我们纳入了253,169份PPR。2007 - 2014年与2016 - 2017年相比,有生命体征登记的PPR比例分别为:血压:73 - 86%,81 - 82%;心率:76 - 88%,82 - 83%;血氧饱和度:72 - 85%,82 - 83%;呼吸频率:34 - 82%,77 - 79%;GCS评分:54 - 92%,81 - 84%;疼痛NRS:0 - 16%,24 - 26%。2007 - 2014年至2016 - 2017年的增长显著,2014年和2016年之间的差异也显著。我们发现定义的异常值很少(0.5%)。
登记的完整性逐渐增加,但在新版本实施后略有下降。高完整性加上极少不合理的异常值和一致性表明生命体征登记是正确的。
无。
丹麦北部地区紧急医疗服务医疗主任批准使用数据。