• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微波治疗与负压抽吸刮除术治疗腋窝多汗症和腋臭的比较:回顾性分析。

Comparison of Microwave-Based Therapy and Negative-Pressure Suction-Curettage for Axillary Hyperhidrosis and Bromhidrosis: A Retrospective Analysis.

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S86-S88. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003929.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003929
PMID:39101854
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis are common clinical diseases, affecting the patients' work and life. Negative-pressure suction-curettage is the most popular treatment now, but challenged by a new microwave-based therapy (MiraDry). We intend to compare the safety and efficiency of the 2 treatments.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 39 female patients with both primary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis was conducted. Seventeen patients were treated with MiraDry, and 22 underwent negative-pressure suction-curettage. The postoperative follow-up program included sweat and odor assessments, satisfaction measurement, safety evaluation, and recurrence assessment at different time points until 12 months.

RESULTS

Both treatments showed a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in HDSS score and odor level at 6 and 12 months compared with the baseline. No significant difference in relative reduction was observed between the 2 groups. The satisfaction score of the microwave-based therapy group was higher than that of the negative-pressure suction-curettage group, but no statistical difference was found. The difference in the recurrence rate and complication rate between the groups did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave-based therapy is a noninvasive treatment with durable effects, low risks, shorter downtime, good appearance, and high satisfaction for axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis.

摘要

背景

腋下多汗症和腋臭是常见的临床疾病,影响患者的工作和生活。目前,负压抽吸刮除术是最受欢迎的治疗方法,但受到一种新的微波治疗(MiraDry)的挑战。我们旨在比较这两种治疗方法的安全性和有效性。

方法

对 39 名患有原发性多汗症和腋臭的女性患者进行回顾性分析。17 名患者接受了 MiraDry 治疗,22 名患者接受了负压抽吸刮除术。术后随访计划包括在不同时间点评估出汗和气味、满意度测量、安全性评估和复发评估,直到 12 个月。

结果

两种治疗方法在 6 个月和 12 个月时与基线相比,HDSS 评分和气味水平均显著降低(P<0.05)。两组之间相对减少率没有显著差异。微波治疗组的满意度评分高于负压抽吸刮除组,但无统计学差异。两组间复发率和并发症率的差异无统计学意义。

结论

微波治疗是一种非侵入性治疗方法,具有持久的效果、低风险、较短的停机时间、良好的外观和对腋下多汗症和腋臭的高满意度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Microwave-Based Therapy and Negative-Pressure Suction-Curettage for Axillary Hyperhidrosis and Bromhidrosis: A Retrospective Analysis.微波治疗与负压抽吸刮除术治疗腋窝多汗症和腋臭的比较:回顾性分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S86-S88. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003929.
2
Minimally invasive approaches to axillary osmidrosis treatment: A comparison between superficial liposuction with automatic shaver curettage, subcutaneous laser treatment, and microwave-based therapy with a modified technique.腋臭治疗的微创方法:自动剃须刀刮除术辅助浅表吸脂术、皮下激光治疗以及改良技术的微波治疗的比较
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Apr;18(2):594-601. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12731. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
A case series evaluating microwave-based therapy for axillary hyperhidrosis and bromhidrosis.一项评估微波疗法治疗腋窝多汗症和腋臭的病例系列研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 May;33(3):1572-1575. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1856317. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
Tumescent suction curettage versus minimal skin resection with subcutaneous curettage of sweat glands in axillary hyperhidrosis.肿胀吸脂刮除术与腋窝多汗症中最小皮肤切除术联合皮下汗腺刮除术的比较
Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):709-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34132.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
5
Impact of microwave thermolysis energy levels on patient-reported outcomes for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis.微波热解能级对腋窝多汗症和腋臭患者报告结局的影响。
Lasers Surg Med. 2023 Jan;55(1):105-115. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23610. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
The comparative effectiveness of suction-curettage and onabotulinumtoxin-A injections for the treatment of primary focal axillary hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial.抽吸刮除术和肉毒毒素 A 注射治疗原发性局限性腋窝多汗症的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jul;69(1):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
7
Long-term efficacy of subcutaneous sweat gland suction curettage for axillary hyperhidrosis: a prospective gravimetrically controlled study.皮下汗腺抽吸刮除术治疗腋窝多汗症的长期疗效:一项前瞻性重量控制研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1170-7; discussion 1177. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34255.x. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
8
Comparison of Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Microwave and Surgery in the Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.微波与手术治疗腋臭的长期疗效及安全性比较:单中心回顾性研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2022 Jan 1;48(1):126-130. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003276.
9
Tumescent suction curettage in the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis: experience in 63 patients.肿胀吸脂刮除术治疗腋窝多汗症:63例患者的经验
Dermatology. 2006;213(3):215-7. doi: 10.1159/000095038.
10
Tumescent superficial liposuction with curettage for treatment of axillary bromhidrosis.肿胀性浅表吸脂刮除术治疗腋臭
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jan;22(1):30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02323.x.