Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2024 Aug;29(4):280-298. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000380.
Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) have been shown to effectively reduce absenteeism, workplace injury rates, and health-related productivity impairments. However, established measures for determining its impact on employee-level productivity have rarely been used, nor have studies employed biological measures of well-being. Drawing on the allostatic load theory, we examine the effects of an EAP on biological measures (heart rate, heart rate variability), established measures of health-related productivity (Workability Index, Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Workplace Limitations Questionnaire), and absenteeism 4 weeks and 6 months after clients started to receive counseling. We conducted a quasi-experimental study comparing an EAP (n = 73) with a matched control group (n = 134) using propensity score matching. We found that an EAP improves health-related productivity 4 weeks and 6 months after enrolling in counseling, above and beyond changes in the control group. Biological measures changed in the hypothesized directions, but differences between the groups did not reach significance. Absenteeism did not change in the EAP group 6 months after enrolling in counseling. In an exploratory analysis, we found that individuals requiring many sessions in the first 4 weeks showed worse productivity outcomes, demonstrating a negative dose-response relationship. Our study provides an example of how to include biological measures in EAP research. It adds to the scientific evidence of the usefulness of EAP services in restoring employee-level productivity. We calculate that the marginal productivity improvements per employee using the EAP are as much as $15,600 per annum. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
员工援助计划 (EAP) 已被证明能有效地降低旷工率、工作场所受伤率和与健康相关的生产力下降。然而,用于确定其对员工层面生产力影响的既定措施很少被使用,也没有研究采用幸福感的生物学衡量标准。借鉴适应负荷理论,我们考察了 EAP 对生物学衡量标准(心率、心率变异性)、与健康相关的生产力的既定衡量标准(工作能力指数、健康和工作绩效问卷、工作场所限制问卷)以及缺勤的影响,这些影响是在客户开始接受咨询后 4 周和 6 个月测量的。我们进行了一项准实验研究,使用倾向评分匹配比较了 EAP(n = 73)和匹配对照组(n = 134)。我们发现,EAP 在参加咨询后 4 周和 6 个月都提高了与健康相关的生产力,超过了对照组的变化。生物学衡量标准朝着假设的方向变化,但组间差异没有达到显著水平。参加咨询后 6 个月,EAP 组的旷工率没有变化。在探索性分析中,我们发现前 4 周需要多次咨询的个体生产力结果更差,表明存在负剂量反应关系。我们的研究提供了一个在 EAP 研究中纳入生物学衡量标准的例子。它增加了 EAP 服务在恢复员工层面生产力方面有用性的科学证据。我们计算出,使用 EAP 每个员工的边际生产力提高了 15600 美元左右。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。