Mills Peter R, Kessler Ronald C, Cooper John, Sullivan Sean
Vielife Limited, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(1):45-53. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.45.
Evaluate the impact of a multicomponent workplace health promotion program on employee health risks and work productivity.
Quasi-experimental 12-month before-after intervention-control study.
A multinational corporation headquartered in the United Kingdom.
Of 618 employees offered the program, 266 (43%) completed questionnaires before and after the program. A total of 1242 of 2500 (49.7%) of a control population also completed questionnaires 12 months apart.
A multicomponent health promotion program incorporating a health risk appraisal questionnaire, access to a tailored health improvement web portal, wellness literature, and seminars and workshops focused upon identified wellness issues.
Outcomes were (1) cumulative count of health risk factors and the World Health Organization health and work performance questionnaire measures of (2) workplace absenteeism and (3) work performance.
After adjusting for baseline differences, improvements in all three outcomes were significantly greater in the intervention group compared with the control group. Mean excess reductions of 0.45 health risk factors and 0.36 monthly absenteeism days and a mean increase of 0.79 on the work performance scale were observed in the intervention group compared with the control group. The intervention yielded a positive return on investment, even using conservative assumptions about effect size estimation.
The results suggest that a well-implemented multicomponent workplace health promotion program can produce sizeable changes in health risks and productivity.
评估多组分工作场所健康促进计划对员工健康风险和工作效率的影响。
类实验性前后对照干预研究,为期12个月。
一家总部位于英国的跨国公司。
在618名参与该计划的员工中,266人(43%)在计划前后完成了问卷调查。在2500名对照人群中,共有1242人(49.7%)也在相隔12个月的时间里完成了问卷调查。
一项多组分健康促进计划,包括一份健康风险评估问卷、一个定制的健康改善网络门户、健康宣传资料,以及针对已确定的健康问题举办的研讨会和工作坊。
结果包括(1)健康风险因素的累计计数,以及世界卫生组织关于(2)工作场所缺勤率和(3)工作效率的健康与工作绩效问卷调查指标。
在对基线差异进行调整后,干预组在所有三项结果方面的改善均显著大于对照组。与对照组相比,干预组的健康风险因素平均额外减少0.45个,每月缺勤天数平均减少0.36天,工作绩效量表平均提高0.79分。即使采用关于效应量估计的保守假设,该干预措施仍产生了正的投资回报率。
结果表明,一项实施良好的多组分工作场所健康促进计划能够在健康风险和生产力方面产生显著变化。