Suppr超能文献

作为精神障碍的跨诊断维度的异常抑制控制 - 不同精神科人群反扫视任务的荟萃分析。

Aberrant inhibitory control as a transdiagnostic dimension of mental disorders - A meta-analysis of the antisaccade task in different psychiatric populations.

机构信息

Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Germany.

Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Germany; Otto-Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Oct;165:105840. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105840. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined inhibitory control performance in the antisaccade task across mental disorders. Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed data from k = 146 studies (n = 13,807 participants) on antisaccade performance. Effect sizes were estimated using random-effects models and restricted maximum-likelihood estimation, with robustness tests for study heterogeneity and publication bias. Most disorders displayed elevated error rates, with schizophrenia showing the greatest impairments, followed by autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Small to medium impairments were also found in eating disorders, major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and substance use disorder. Results were robust against corrections for publication bias and largely unaffected by confounding variables. Prolonged latencies were observed in schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder, with smaller and less robust effect sizes. Results indicate inhibitory control deficits in the antisaccade task across mental disorders, especially evident for error rates. While present in most disorders, results imply varying degrees of impairments, ranging from small to large in effect sizes, with largest impairments in schizophrenia.

摘要

本荟萃分析考察了在反扫视任务中抑制控制表现的精神障碍。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们分析了 k = 146 项研究(n = 13807 名参与者)的反扫视表现数据。使用随机效应模型和最大似然估计法估计效应大小,并对研究异质性和发表偏倚进行稳健性检验。大多数障碍显示出错误率升高,精神分裂症显示出最大的损伤,其次是自闭症谱系障碍、双相情感障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍。在进食障碍、重度抑郁症、强迫症和物质使用障碍中也发现了小到中等程度的损伤。结果对出版偏倚的纠正具有稳健性,并且在很大程度上不受混杂变量的影响。在精神分裂症、注意缺陷多动障碍、双相情感障碍和强迫症中观察到潜伏期延长,其效应大小较小且不稳健。结果表明,在反扫视任务中存在抑制控制缺陷,在精神障碍中尤为明显,表现在错误率上。虽然在大多数障碍中存在,但结果表明损伤程度不同,效应大小从小到大,精神分裂症的损伤最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验