Reilly James L, Frankovich Kyle, Hill Scot, Gershon Elliot S, Keefe Richard S E, Keshavan Matcheri S, Pearlson Godfrey D, Tamminga Carol A, Sweeney John A
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL;
Center for Mind and Brain and Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA;
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Sep;40(5):1011-21. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt132. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
Elevated antisaccade error rate, reflecting problems with inhibitory behavioral control, is a promising intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia. Here, we consider whether it marks liability across psychotic disorders via common or different neurophysiological mechanisms and whether it represents a neurocognitive risk indicator apart from the generalized cognitive deficit.
Schizophrenia (n = 267), schizoaffective (n = 150), and psychotic bipolar (n = 202) probands, their first-degree relatives (ns = 304, 193, 242, respectively), and healthy controls (n = 244), participating in the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes consortium, performed antisaccade and prosaccade tasks and completed a neuropsychological battery.
Antisaccade error rate was elevated in proband groups with greatest deficit observed in schizophrenia and was unrelated to symptoms and antipsychotic treatment. Increased error rate was also observed among relatives, even those without history of psychosis or psychosis spectrum personality traits. Relatives' deficits were similar across proband diagnoses. Error rate was familial and remained elevated in proband and relative groups after accounting for generalized cognitive impairment. Speed of attentional shifting, indexed by prosaccade latency, was similarly influenced in all groups by manipulations that freed vs increasingly engaged attention systems and was inversely associated with antisaccade error rate in all but schizophrenia probands.
These findings indicate that elevated antisaccade error rate represents an intermediate phenotype for psychosis across diagnostic categories, and that it tracks risk beyond that attributable to the generalized cognitive deficit. The greater severity of antisaccade impairment in schizophrenia and its independence from attention shifting processes suggest more severe and specific prefrontal inhibitory control deficits in this disorder.
反扫视错误率升高反映了抑制性行为控制方面的问题,是精神分裂症一个很有前景的中间表型。在此,我们探讨它是否通过共同或不同的神经生理机制标志着所有精神障碍的易感性,以及它是否代表了一种独立于广义认知缺陷之外的神经认知风险指标。
精神分裂症患者(n = 267)、分裂情感性障碍患者(n = 150)和精神病性双相障碍先证者(n = 202)、他们的一级亲属(分别为n = 304、193、242)以及健康对照者(n = 244)参与了中间表型双相-精神分裂症网络研究,进行了反扫视和正扫视任务,并完成了一套神经心理学测试。
先证者组的反扫视错误率升高,其中精神分裂症患者的缺陷最为明显,且与症状及抗精神病药物治疗无关。亲属中也观察到错误率增加,即使是那些没有精神病病史或精神病谱系人格特质的亲属。亲属的缺陷在不同先证者诊断组中相似。错误率具有家族性,在考虑广义认知损害后,先证者组和亲属组的错误率仍保持升高。以正扫视潜伏期为指标的注意力转移速度,在所有组中都受到释放与增加参与注意力系统的操作的类似影响,并且在除精神分裂症先证者外的所有组中与反扫视错误率呈负相关。
这些发现表明,升高的反扫视错误率代表了跨诊断类别的精神病的中间表型,并且它追踪的风险超出了广义认知缺陷所致的风险。精神分裂症中反扫视损害更严重且独立于注意力转移过程,这表明该疾病存在更严重和特定的前额叶抑制控制缺陷。