The Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Center for Population Health Research, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14365. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14365. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
To assess factors impacting obstetric transport and referral processes for pregnant patients experiencing an emergency in a rural state without a perinatal regionalized system of care.
Data is from Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) without obstetric units and healthcare providers involved in obstetric care and transport at hospitals with varying levels of obstetric capacity in Montana.
This mixed-methods study involved surveying CAHs without obstetric units about the hospitals' capacity for obstetric emergencies and transport policies. Survey data were collected from 32 of 34 CAHs without obstetric units (94% response rate) in the fall of 2021. Subsequent interviews were conducted in the fall and winter of 2022-2023 with 20 hospital and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to provide further insights into the referral and transport process during obstetric emergencies.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Survey data were collected using REDCap; interviews were conducted via videoconference. We performed descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests for quantitative data. We analyzed qualitative data using a three-phase pragmatic analytic approach.
The survey of CAHs found 12 of 32 facilities faced difficulties coordinating transport for pregnant patients. Qualitative data indicated this was often due to the state's decentralized transport system. Challenges identified through both quantitative and qualitative data included weather, securing a receiving facility/provider, and coordinating medical transport. Only 10 CAHs reported having written protocols for transporting pregnant patients; of those, four facilities had formal transfer agreements. Qualitative data emphasized variations in awareness and the utility of obstetric transport policies.
A decentralized transport system in a rural state can exacerbate existing challenges faced by providers arranging transport for pregnant patients during an obstetric emergency. State and interfacility policies could enhance the transport process for increased regionalization as well as increased support for and coordination of existing EMS.
评估在一个没有围产期区域化医疗体系的农村州,对于遭遇紧急情况的孕妇,影响产科转运和转介流程的因素。
数据来自没有产科病房的关键通道医院(CAHs),以及在蒙大拿州不同产科能力水平的医院参与产科护理和转运的医疗保健提供者。
这项混合方法研究涉及对没有产科病房的 CAHs 进行调查,了解医院处理产科急症和转运政策的能力。2021 年秋季,对 34 家没有产科病房的 CAHs 中的 32 家(94%的回复率)进行了调查。随后,在 2022-2023 年的秋季和冬季,对 20 名医院和紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员进行了访谈,以进一步了解产科急症期间的转介和转运流程。
数据收集/提取方法:使用 REDCap 收集调查数据;通过视频会议进行访谈。我们对定量数据进行了描述性统计和 Fisher 精确检验。我们使用三阶段实用分析方法对定性数据进行了分析。
对 CAHs 的调查发现,12 家医院在协调孕妇转运方面存在困难。定性数据表明,这通常是由于该州分散的转运系统所致。通过定量和定性数据确定的挑战包括天气、确保接收设施/提供者,以及协调医疗转运。只有 10 家 CAHs 报告制定了转运孕妇的书面协议;其中,有 4 家医院有正式的转院协议。定性数据强调了对产科转运政策的认识和实用性存在差异。
在一个农村州,分散的转运系统可能会加剧提供者在产科急症期间为孕妇安排转运所面临的现有挑战。州和机构间政策可以增强转运流程,促进区域化,以及增加对现有 EMS 的支持和协调。