• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支区域起搏时冠状动脉安全性评估。

Safety assessment of coronary arteries during left bundle branch area pacing.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 1 Minde Rd, East-lake District, 330006, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 430060, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Herz. 2024 Dec;49(6):472-478. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05259-w. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-024-05259-w
PMID:39103695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602848/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the safety of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) by measuring the distance from the tip of the electrode to the nearby coronary artery with a nine-partition grid method.

METHODS

From January 2019 to October 2020, patients who underwent LBBAP and postoperative coronary angiography in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in the study. The patients' fluoroscopic images of LBBAP and coronary angiography were collected and analyzed. Changes in the ST‑T segment in the electrocardiogram (ECG), serum troponin, and myocardial enzyme profiles were observed before and after the LBBAP procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included in this study, of whom 46 patients underwent implantation with a pacemaker and 4 patients received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The pacing electrodes were confined to the posterior-middle (PM), median (M), Posterior inferior (PI), and middle inferior (MI) positions of the two-dimensional nine-square grid or in the junction area of the above positions, and were concentrated in the rectangle formed by the line of the center points of the four positions. The average vertical distances from the electrode tip to the left anterior descending branch artery (LAD), posterior descending branches (PD) and the left posterior ventricular branches (PL) were 19.69 ± 8.72 mm, 26.09 ± 8.02 mm, and 21.11 ± 7.86 mm, respectively; the minimum was 5.28 mm, 9.51 mm, and 8.69 mm, respectively. Coronary angiography in all patients showed no significant injury to the ventricular septal branch; however, we observed elevated serum troponin and changes in ST‑T segment in ECG.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that pacing electrodes in LBBAP can be safely implanted over a wide range. Coronary arteries are likely to be safe when the pacing electrodes are located within the rectangle formed by the line connecting the PM, M, PI, and MI zone centroids. The left bundle branch can be quickly captured and the safety of the coronary artery can be improved by locating the electrode in the posterior-mid zone. The potential risk of injury to the LAD from the electrode is greater compared with the PD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过使用九分区网格方法测量电极尖端到附近冠状动脉的距离来评估左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)的安全性。

方法

本研究纳入了 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月在南昌大学第二附属医院行 LBBAP 并术后行冠状动脉造影的患者。收集并分析患者 LBBAP 和冠状动脉造影的透视图像。观察 LBBAP 术前和术后心电图(ECG)ST-T 段变化、血清肌钙蛋白和心肌酶谱。

结果

共纳入 50 例患者,其中 46 例行起搏器植入,4 例行植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入。起搏电极局限于二维九分区网格的后中(PM)、中(M)、后下(PI)和中下(MI)位置或上述位置的交界处,集中在四个位置中心点连线形成的矩形内。电极尖端到左前降支(LAD)、后降支(PD)和左后室支(PL)的平均垂直距离分别为 19.69±8.72mm、26.09±8.02mm 和 21.11±7.86mm,最小距离分别为 5.28mm、9.51mm 和 8.69mm。所有患者的冠状动脉造影均未见室间隔支明显损伤,但观察到血清肌钙蛋白升高和 ECG 中 ST-T 段变化。

结论

本研究表明,LBBAP 中的起搏电极可以在广泛的范围内安全植入。当起搏电极位于连接 PM、M、PI 和 MI 区中心点的连线形成的矩形内时,冠状动脉可能是安全的。将电极定位于后中区域可快速捕获左束支并提高冠状动脉安全性。与 PD 相比,电极对 LAD 的潜在损伤风险更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/072ea0aa1ee8/59_2024_5259_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/16a8caff2830/59_2024_5259_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/eafd8bda5122/59_2024_5259_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/072ea0aa1ee8/59_2024_5259_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/16a8caff2830/59_2024_5259_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/eafd8bda5122/59_2024_5259_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d821/11602848/072ea0aa1ee8/59_2024_5259_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety assessment of coronary arteries during left bundle branch area pacing.左束支区域起搏时冠状动脉安全性评估。
Herz. 2024 Dec;49(6):472-478. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05259-w. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Dual-chamber ICD for left bundle branch area pacing: the cardiac resynchronization and arrhythmia sensing via the left bundle (cross-left) pilot study.双腔 ICD 用于左束支区域起搏:通过左束(交叉左)先导研究进行心脏再同步和心律失常感知。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;66(4):905-912. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01342-6. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
3
Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study.多中心心脏血流动力学评估 LOT-CRT 策略:联合左束支起搏和冠状静脉起搏增强心脏再同步化治疗的最佳时机是什么?:CSPOT 研究的主要结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;17(11):e013059. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013059. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.心力衰竭合并完全性左束支传导阻滞患者中左束支区域起搏与双心室起搏的长期预后
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jul;37(7):1162-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-02016-5. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
6
[Feasibility and safety of new simplified left bundle branch area pacing via nine-partition method].[通过九分区法进行新型简化左束支区域起搏的可行性与安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 24;48(10):848-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200520-00414.
7
Feasibility, safety, and short-term follow-up of defibrillator lead at left bundle branch area pacing location: A pilot study.左束支区域起搏部位除颤器导线的可行性、安全性和短期随访:一项初步研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Oct;21(10):1900-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.020. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
8
Lead performance of stylet-driven leads in left bundle branch area pacing: Results from a large single-center cohort and insights from in vitro bench testing.探条驱动电极导线在左束支区域起搏中的领先表现:来自大型单中心队列的结果及体外台架测试的见解
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):865-873. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.049. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
Complications of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in candidates for resynchronization therapy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter registry.在心脏再同步治疗候选者中,左束支区域起搏与双心室起搏的并发症比较:一项多中心注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析结果
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):874-880. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.053. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
10
Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.左束支区域起搏抢救冠状静脉内起搏失败或双心室起搏无反应:来自国际 LBBAP 协作研究组的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug;19(8):1272-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.024. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing.评价区分左束支起搏与左心室间隔起搏的标准。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;7(9):1166-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Cardiac troponin release following left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏后心肌肌钙蛋白释放。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):851-855. doi: 10.1111/jce.14905. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Coronary-Cameral Fistula Secondary to Pacemaker Implantation.起搏器植入术后继发冠状-心腔瘘
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Oct;6(10):1335-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.06.016.
4
Injection of contrast medium through a delivery sheath reveals interventricular septal vascular injury in a case of left bundle branch pacing.在一例左束支起搏病例中,通过输送鞘管注射造影剂显示室间隔血管损伤。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520947880. doi: 10.1177/0300060520947880.
5
Computed tomography coronary angiography - past, present and future.计算机断层冠状动脉造影——过去、现在和未来。
Singapore Med J. 2020 Mar;61(3):109-115. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020028.
6
Simplifying Physiological Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using a New Nine-Partition Method.使用一种新的九分区法简化生理性左束支区域起搏
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;37(2):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Left Bundle Branch Pacing: JACC Review Topic of the Week.左束支起搏:JACC 本周专题
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 17;74(24):3039-3049. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.039. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
8
Cardiac Troponin Increase After Endurance Exercise.耐力运动后心肌肌钙蛋白升高。
Circulation. 2019 Sep 9;140(10):815-818. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042131. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
9
A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing.永久性左束支起搏初学者指南。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1791-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
10
Injury to the coronary arteries and related structures by implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices.心脏植入式电子设备植入导致的冠状动脉及相关结构损伤。
Europace. 2015 Apr;17(4):524-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu345. Epub 2015 Jan 6.