• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丛集性头痛中的残疾不仅仅与发作频率有关——《丛集性头痛影响问卷》(CHIQ)英文版的结果和验证。

Disability in cluster headache is more than attack frequency - results from and validation of the English version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.

Department of Neurosurgery, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Headache Pain. 2024 Aug 5;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8.

DOI:10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8
PMID:39103768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11299406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cluster headache (CH) is associated with high disability. The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a short, disease-specific disability questionnaire first developed and validated in German. Here, we validated the English version of this questionnaire.

METHODS

The CHIQ was assessed together with nonspecific headache-related disability questionnaires in CH patients from a tertiary headache center and an American self-help group.

RESULTS

155 active episodic and chronic CH patients were included. The CHIQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, n = 44). Factor analysis identified a single factor. Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with the Headache Impact Test™ (HIT-6™, ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS depression: ρ = 0.53, HADS anxiety: ρ = 0.61, both p < 0.001), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and with CH attack frequency (ρ = 0.29, p < 0.001). Chronic CH patients showed the highest CHIQ scores (25.4 ± 7.9, n = 76), followed by active episodic CH and episodic CH patients in remission (active eCH: 22.2 ± 8.7, n = 79; eCH in remission: 14.1 ± 13.1, n = 127; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the CHIQ was graded into 5 levels from "no to low impact" to "extreme impact" based on the patients' perception. Higher CHIQ grading was associated with higher attack and acute medication frequency, HIT-6™, HADS and PSS scores.

CONCLUSION

The English version of the CHIQ is a reliable, valid, and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of headaches on CH patients.

摘要

背景

丛集性头痛(CH)与高残疾相关。《丛集性头痛影响问卷》(CHIQ)是一种简短的、针对特定疾病的残疾问卷,最初在德国开发并验证。在这里,我们验证了该问卷的英文版本。

方法

在一家三级头痛中心和一个美国自助小组的丛集性头痛患者中,同时评估 CHIQ 与非特异性头痛相关残疾问卷。

结果

共纳入 155 例活动性发作性和慢性 CH 患者。CHIQ 显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.91)和重测信度(ICC = 0.93,n = 44)。因子分析确定了一个单一因素。与 Headache Impact Test™(HIT-6™,ρ = 0.72,p < 0.001)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS 抑郁:ρ = 0.53,HADS 焦虑:ρ = 0.61,均 p < 0.001)、感知压力量表(PSS-10,ρ = 0.61,p < 0.001)和 CH 发作频率(ρ = 0.29,p < 0.001)的显著相关性表明了其具有良好的聚合效度。慢性 CH 患者的 CHIQ 评分最高(25.4 ± 7.9,n = 76),其次是活动性发作性 CH 和缓解期的发作性 CH 患者(活动性 eCH:22.2 ± 8.7,n = 79;缓解期 eCH:14.1 ± 13.1,n = 127;p < 0.001)。此外,根据患者的感知,将 CHIQ 分为从“无到低影响”到“极度影响”的 5 个等级。更高的 CHIQ 分级与更高的发作和急性药物治疗频率、HIT-6™、HADS 和 PSS 评分相关。

结论

CHIQ 的英文版本是一种可靠、有效的、针对特定疾病的患者报告结局测量工具,可用于评估头痛对 CH 患者的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/7a37217a0569/10194_2024_1838_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/864cf24f0ae4/10194_2024_1838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/4795b072702f/10194_2024_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/ca4c0926376e/10194_2024_1838_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/7a37217a0569/10194_2024_1838_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/864cf24f0ae4/10194_2024_1838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/4795b072702f/10194_2024_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/ca4c0926376e/10194_2024_1838_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/11299406/7a37217a0569/10194_2024_1838_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Disability in cluster headache is more than attack frequency - results from and validation of the English version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).丛集性头痛中的残疾不仅仅与发作频率有关——《丛集性头痛影响问卷》(CHIQ)英文版的结果和验证。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Aug 5;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01838-8.
2
Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) - a short measure of cluster headache related disability.丛集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)- 一种衡量丛集性头痛相关残疾的简短方法。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Mar 18;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01406-y.
3
Validation of the Italian version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).验证簇集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)的意大利语版本。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Aug;44(8):2845-2851. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06758-0. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Measurement properties of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™ Brazil) in primary and secondary headaches.原发性头痛和继发性头痛中头痛影响测试(HIT-6™ Brazil)的测量特性。
Headache. 2021 Mar;61(3):527-535. doi: 10.1111/head.14049. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
The development and validation of the Cluster Headache Quality of life scale (CHQ).《丛集性头痛生活质量量表(CHQ)的制定与验证》。
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0674-1. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
6
Depression and anxiety in episodic and chronic cluster headache: a pilot study.发作性和慢性丛集性头痛中的抑郁和焦虑:一项初步研究。
Headache. 2012 Apr;52(4):600-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02024.x. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
7
Hyperalgesia and Central Sensitization Signs in Patients with Cluster Headache: A Cross-Sectional Study.丛集性头痛患者的痛觉过敏和中枢敏化体征:一项横断面研究。
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2562-2570. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz070.
8
Determination of psychosocial factors in cluster headache - construction and psychometric properties of the Cluster Headache Scales (CHS).丛集性头痛的心理社会因素的确定 - 丛集性头痛量表(CHS)的构建和心理计量学特性。
Cephalalgia. 2020 Oct;40(11):1240-1249. doi: 10.1177/0333102420928076. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
The neuropsychology of cluster headache: cognition, mood, disability, and quality of life of patients with chronic and episodic cluster headache.丛集性头痛的神经心理学:慢性和发作性丛集性头痛患者的认知、情绪、残疾状况及生活质量
Headache. 2015 Feb;55(2):287-300. doi: 10.1111/head.12486.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI/T) in patients with cervicogenic headache.亨利·福特医院头痛残疾量表土耳其语版(HDI/T)在颈源性头痛患者中的跨文化调适、信度及效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Feb;46(4):820-827. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2178679. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurotransmitter Imbalance in Cluster Headache: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.丛集性头痛中的神经递质失衡:机制与治疗靶点的系统评价
Pain Ther. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00778-8.
2
Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of cluster headache impact questionnaire in both active episodic and chronic cluster headache.发作性和慢性丛集性头痛中阿拉伯语版丛集性头痛影响问卷的信度和效度
J Headache Pain. 2025 May 21;26(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01991-8.
3
[The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire : Measuring headache-related impairment in cluster headache patients].

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Italian version of the Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ).验证簇集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)的意大利语版本。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Aug;44(8):2845-2851. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06758-0. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) - a short measure of cluster headache related disability.丛集性头痛影响问卷(CHIQ)- 一种衡量丛集性头痛相关残疾的简短方法。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Mar 18;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01406-y.
3
Determination of psychosocial factors in cluster headache - construction and psychometric properties of the Cluster Headache Scales (CHS).
[丛集性头痛影响问卷:评估丛集性头痛患者与头痛相关的功能损害]
Schmerz. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00859-1.
丛集性头痛的心理社会因素的确定 - 丛集性头痛量表(CHS)的构建和心理计量学特性。
Cephalalgia. 2020 Oct;40(11):1240-1249. doi: 10.1177/0333102420928076. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
Disability, Quality of Life, and Socioeconomic Burden of Cluster Headache: A Critical Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.丛集性头痛的残疾、生活质量和社会经济负担:当前证据和未来展望的批判性综述。
Headache. 2020 Apr;60(4):809-818. doi: 10.1111/head.13784. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.国际头痛协会(IHS)头痛分类委员会《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202.
7
The development and validation of the Cluster Headache Quality of life scale (CHQ).《丛集性头痛生活质量量表(CHQ)的制定与验证》。
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0674-1. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Cluster headache in the United States of America: demographics, clinical characteristics, triggers, suicidality, and personal burden.美国丛集性头痛:人口统计学、临床特征、诱因、自杀倾向和个人负担。
Headache. 2012 Jan;52(1):99-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02028.x. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
10
Impairment in episodic and chronic cluster headache.发作性和慢性丛集性头痛的障碍。
Cephalalgia. 2011 Apr;31(6):671-82. doi: 10.1177/0333102410391489. Epub 2010 Dec 1.