Suppr超能文献

[俄罗斯嗅觉测试的开发与验证]

[Development and validation of Russian olfactory test].

作者信息

Lebedeva G V, Svistushkin M V, Selezneva L V, Muzychenko Yu N, Suvorov A Yu, Khutornoi I V, Pedder A V, Pedder V V, Kudryavtseva V A, Pogosyan K K

机构信息

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

Metromed Scientific and Production Enterprise, Omsk, Russia.

出版信息

Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2024;89(3):41-47. doi: 10.17116/otorino20248903141.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Olfactory disorders is one of the first symptoms of diseases from various departments of medicine (otorhinolaryngology, psychology, neurology, etc.). Based on international clinical recommendations, olfactory tests are the gold standard for the diagnosis of olfactory disorders. There are many different psychophysical tests: UPSIT (USA, Pennsylvania), Sniffin' Sticks test (Germany), BAST-24 (Spain), etc. Currently, there is an acute shortage of olfactory tests available for clinical practice In Russia. This problem is related to the fact that there are no olfactory tests registered as medical devices on the territory of the Russian Federation. Also, a significant limitation is the unrecognizability of odors by the population of our country, which include foreign analogues (licorice, anise, turpentine, etc.).

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the national olfactory test on healthy volunteers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The development and validation of the olfactory test included several stages. First, the development of an olfactory test was carried out, the selection of aromas to assess the threshold and identification ability of olfaction. 25 dilutions of -butanol were used for the assessment of the threshold olfactory ability. For the stage of assessing the identification ability of the sense of smell, in our previous study, an assessment of the recognition of odor names in the territory of the Russian Federation was carried out. A total of 3.000 people from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation were interviewed. During the development of the test, 20 names of flavors with the highest rating were used. By the 8, the selection of monocomponent substances was carried out. Commercially available certified food and perfume flavorings have been used for fragrances whose equivalent in the test cannot be a monocomponent substance. A group of 25 healthy volunteers selected a flavor or a monocomponent for each of the 20 positions. To carry out the identification stage of testing, a booklet was developed with answer options for each fragrance, including 80 images associated with the smell. A methodology for conducting diagnostics has been created. Next, the validation of the developed olfactory test was carried out on 150 healthy volunteers. The study included an assessment of the threshold and identification ability of the sense of smell using the developed test and conducting a comparative analysis with a set of flavors and descriptors corresponding to the Sniffin' Sticks test.

RESULTS

The developed test includes: 2 panels - panel 1 to assess the threshold ability of smell, panel 2 to assess the identification ability of smell, a booklet with 80 images and captions to them. The norms of threshold and identification olfactory abilities were also determined in the developed test. The domestic test was validated against the relative foreign Sniffin' Sticks test. Spearman's correlation between the accuracy values of the domestic test (17-20; 85.00-100.00%) and the values of the foreign test (11-16; 68.75-100.00%) did not reveal statistically significant differences (=0.065, =0.432), which confirms the equally effective assessment of olfactory ability by the domestic olfactory test in comparison with its foreign counterpart.

CONCLUSION

In this work, a methodology for the use of Russian olfactory test was developed and validated on healthy volunteers. The features of the developed test are an assessment of the threshold and identification ability of smell, an adapted set of odors for the Russian population, the use of paper blotters when applying flavor and visual images of descriptors. Despite the wide variety of psychophysical tests, this problem requires further study and comparative analysis of olfactory tests available In Russia and foreign analogues in order to obtain a universal and effective diagnostic method for the populations of our country.

UNLABELLED

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 24-25-00415).

摘要

未标注

嗅觉障碍是来自各个医学科室(耳鼻喉科、心理学、神经学等)疾病的首要症状之一。根据国际临床建议,嗅觉测试是诊断嗅觉障碍的金标准。有许多不同的心理物理学测试:UPSIT(美国宾夕法尼亚州)、嗅棒测试(德国)、BAST - 24(西班牙)等。目前,俄罗斯临床实践中可用的嗅觉测试严重短缺。这个问题与俄罗斯联邦境内没有作为医疗器械注册的嗅觉测试这一事实有关。此外,我国民众对包括外国类似物(甘草、茴芹、松节油等)在内的气味无法识别也是一个重大限制。

目的

针对健康志愿者开发并验证国内嗅觉测试。

材料与方法

嗅觉测试的开发和验证包括几个阶段。首先,进行嗅觉测试的开发,选择用于评估嗅觉阈值和识别能力的香气。使用25种不同稀释度的丁醇来评估嗅觉阈值能力。对于评估嗅觉识别能力的阶段,在我们之前的研究中,对俄罗斯联邦境内的气味名称识别进行了评估。总共采访了来自俄罗斯联邦8个联邦区的3000人。在测试开发过程中,使用了评分最高的20种香料名称。到第8步,进行单一组分物质的选择。对于测试中不能是单一组分物质的香料,使用市售的经过认证的食品和香水香料。一组25名健康志愿者为20个位置中的每一个选择一种香料或单一组分。为了进行测试的识别阶段,编写了一本小册子,其中包含每种香料的答案选项,包括80张与气味相关的图片。创建了一种诊断方法。接下来,在150名健康志愿者身上对开发的嗅觉测试进行验证。该研究包括使用开发的测试评估嗅觉阈值和识别能力,并与一组对应于嗅棒测试的香料和描述符进行对比分析。

结果

开发的测试包括:2个面板——面板1用于评估嗅觉阈值能力,面板2用于评估嗅觉识别能力,一本带有80张图片及说明的小册子。在开发的测试中还确定了嗅觉阈值和识别能力的标准。将国内测试与国外相对的嗅棒测试进行了验证。国内测试(17 - 20;85.00 - 100.00%)和国外测试(11 - 16;68.75 - 100.00%)的准确性值之间的斯皮尔曼相关性未显示出统计学上的显著差异(=0.065,=0.432),这证实了国内嗅觉测试与国外同类测试相比,对嗅觉能力的评估同样有效。

结论

在这项工作中,开发了一种俄罗斯嗅觉测试的使用方法,并在健康志愿者身上进行了验证。开发的测试的特点是评估嗅觉阈值和识别能力,为俄罗斯人群适配的一组气味,在应用香料时使用纸质吸墨纸以及描述符的视觉图像。尽管有各种各样的心理物理学测试,但这个问题需要进一步研究,并对俄罗斯现有的嗅觉测试和国外类似测试进行对比分析,以便为我国民众获得一种通用且有效的诊断方法。

未标注

本研究得到俄罗斯基础研究基金会(项目编号24 - 25 - 00415)的支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验