Pätz Toni, Stiermaier Thomas, Meusel Moritz, Reinhard Iris, Jensch Philipp-Johannes, Rawish Elias, Wang Juan, Feistritzer Hans-Josef, Schuster Andreas, Koschalka Alexander, Lange Torben, Kowallick Johannes T, Desch Steffen, Thiele Holger, Eitel Ingo
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 22;11:1422878. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1422878. eCollection 2024.
The aim of this study was to analyze age-associated myocardial injury and clinical outcome after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
This prospective, multicenter study consists of 440 patients with NSTEMI enrolled at 7 centers. All patients were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 1-10 days after study inclusion. CMR parameters of myocardial injury and clinical outcome were evaluated by creating 2 subgroups: <80 years vs. ≥80 years. The clinical endpoint was the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisting of death, re-infarction and new congestive heart failure.
Elderly patients ≥80 years accounted for 13.9% of the study population and showed a divergent cardiovascular risk profile compared to the subgroup of patients <80 years. CMR imaging did not reveal significant differences regarding infarct size, microvascular obstruction, left ventricular ejection fraction or multidimensional strain analysis between the study groups. At 1-year follow-up, MACE rate was significantly increased in patients ≥80 years compared to patients aged <80 years (19.7% vs. 9.6%; = 0.019). In a multiple stepwise logistic regression model, the number of diseased vessels, aldosterone antagonist use and left ventricular global longitudinal strain were identified as independent predictors for MACE in all patients, while there was no independent predictive value of age regarding 1-year clinical outcome.
This prospective, multicenter analysis shows that structural and functional myocardial damage is similar in younger and older patients with NSTEMI. Furthermore, in this heterogeneous but also clinically representative cohort with reduced sample size, age was not independently associated with 1-year clinical outcome, despite an increased event rate in patients ≥80 years.
本研究旨在分析非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)后与年龄相关的心肌损伤及临床结局。
这项前瞻性多中心研究纳入了7个中心的440例NSTEMI患者。所有患者均接受了直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并在纳入研究后1 - 10天接受了心脏磁共振(CMR)成像检查。通过创建两个亚组(<80岁与≥80岁)来评估心肌损伤的CMR参数和临床结局。临床终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的1年发生率,包括死亡、再梗死和新发充血性心力衰竭。
≥80岁的老年患者占研究人群的13.9%,与<80岁的患者亚组相比,其心血管风险特征有所不同。CMR成像显示,各研究组之间在梗死面积、微血管阻塞、左心室射血分数或多维应变分析方面没有显著差异。在1年随访时,≥80岁的患者MACE发生率显著高于<80岁的患者(19.7%对9.6%;P = 0.019)。在多步逻辑回归模型中,病变血管数量、醛固酮拮抗剂的使用和左心室整体纵向应变被确定为所有患者MACE的独立预测因素,而年龄对1年临床结局没有独立预测价值。
这项前瞻性多中心分析表明,年轻和老年NSTEMI患者的心肌结构和功能损伤相似。此外,在这个样本量减少但具有异质性且临床代表性的队列中,尽管≥80岁的患者事件发生率增加,但年龄与1年临床结局并无独立关联。