Khalilian Ekrami Neda, Baron Dawid K, Benjamin Emelia J, Mulder Bart A, Van Gelder Isabelle C, Rienstra Michiel
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Neth Heart J. 2024 Sep;32(9):326-331. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01887-3. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Concerns exist of women underrepresentation in atrial fibrillation (AF) studies, potentially limiting the generalisability of study findings to women with AF. We assessed the participation of women in AF clinical studies performed at a tertiary care centre in the Northern Netherlands.
Eight AF clinical studies with screening logs were available for analysis. To identify sex-specific differences, patient inclusion and exclusion and reasons for exclusion were assessed. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated to evaluate the representation of women in the studies relative to the AF sex distribution of the general population in the Netherlands (2019 Global Burden of Disease study).
We included 1739 screened patients with AF in the analysis, of whom 722 (41.5%) were women. Of the patients screened, 161 (9%) were enrolled. Median age of screened patients was 69 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61-77), and women were older than men (71 years; IQR: 63-79 vs 68 years; IQR: 60-75; p < 0.001). Women were not underscreened compared with men (PPR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.10), disproportionally excluded (92% vs 90%; p = 0.10) or less willing to participate (17% vs 15%; p = 0.36). Women had an overall PPR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.05-1.06) compared with the general AF population.
At our tertiary hospital in the Northern Netherlands, women appeared to be well-represented in AF studies. The current study advocates for the adoption of a more comprehensive measure of equity, such as the PPR, and screening log evaluation to improve the generalisability of study findings to the entire clinical AF population.
人们担心女性在心房颤动(AF)研究中的代表性不足,这可能会限制研究结果对患有AF的女性的普遍适用性。我们评估了荷兰北部一家三级护理中心进行的AF临床研究中女性的参与情况。
有八项带有筛查记录的AF临床研究可供分析。为了确定性别差异,评估了患者的纳入和排除情况以及排除原因。计算参与率与患病率之比(PPR),以评估研究中女性的代表性与荷兰一般人群(2019年全球疾病负担研究)的AF性别分布情况。
我们在分析中纳入了1739名接受筛查的AF患者,其中722名(41.5%)为女性。在接受筛查的患者中,161名(9%)被纳入研究。接受筛查患者的中位年龄为69岁(四分位间距(IQR):61-77),女性比男性年龄大(71岁;IQR:63-79,而男性为68岁;IQR:60-75;p<0.001)。与男性相比,女性接受筛查的比例并不低(PPR:1.09;95%置信区间(CI):1.08-1.10),被不成比例排除的比例(92%对90%;p=0.10)或参与意愿较低的比例(17%对15%;p=0.36)也没有差异。与一般AF人群相比,女性的总体PPR为1.05(95%CI:1.05-1.06)。
在我们位于荷兰北部的三级医院,女性在AF研究中的代表性似乎良好。本研究主张采用更全面的公平性衡量标准,如PPR和筛查记录评估,以提高研究结果对整个临床AF人群的普遍适用性。