Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, and State Key Laboratory of Environment Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Aug;5(8):e542-e551. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00116-8. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Social determinants of health (SDHs) are the primary drivers of preventable health inequities, and the associations between SDHs and health outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes remain unclear. This study aimed to estimate the associations of combined SDHs with life expectancy and future health risks among adults with type 2 diabetes from the UK and USA.
In an analysis of two nationwide cohort studies, adults with type 2 diabetes were identified from the UK Biobank from March 13, 2006, to Oct 1, 2010 (adults aged 37-73 years) and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018 (adults aged ≥20 years). Participants with type 2 diabetes at baseline were included in our analysis. Participants without information on SDHs or follow-up were excluded. The UK Biobank assessed 17 SDHs and the US NHANES assessed ten SDHs, with each SDH dichotomised into advantaged and disadvantaged levels. The combined score of SDHs were calculated as the sum of the weighted scores for each SDH. Participants were then categorised into tertiles (favourable, medium, and unfavourable SDH groups). Primary outcomes were life expectancy and mortality in both cohorts, and incidences of cardiovascular disease, diabetes-related microvascular disease, dementia, and cancer in the UK Biobank. Outcomes were obtained from disease registries up until Dec 31, 2021, in the UK Biobank and Dec 31, 2019, in the US NHANES cohorts.
We included 17 321 participants from the UK Biobank cohort (median age 61·0 years [IQR 56·0-65·0]; 6028 [34·8%] women and 11 293 [65·2%] men) and 7885 participants from the NHANES cohort (mean age 59·2 years [95% CI 58·7-59·6]; 3835 [49·1%, weighted] women and 4050 [50·9%, weighted] men) in our analysis. In the UK Biobank, 3235 deaths (median follow-up 12·3 years [IQR 11·5-13·2]), 3010 incident cardiovascular disease (12·1 years [10·8-13·0]), 1997 diabetes-related microvascular disease (8·0 years [7·1-8·9]), 773 dementia (12·6 years [11·8-13·5]), and 2259 cancer cases (11·3 years [10·4-12·2]) were documented; and the US NHANES documented 2278 deaths during a median follow-up of 7·0 years (3·7-11·2). After multivariable adjustment, compared with the favourable SDH group, the hazard ratio was 1·33 (95% CI 1·21-1·46) in the medium SDH group and 1·89 (1·72-2·07) in the unfavourable SDH group in the UK Biobank cohort; 1·51 (1·34-1·70) in the medium SDH group and 2·02 (1·75-2·33) in the unfavourable SDH group in the US NHANES cohort for all-cause mortality; 1·13 (1·04-1·24) in the medium SDH group and 1·40 (1·27-1·53) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident cardiovascular disease; 1·13 (1·01-1·27) in the medium SDH group and 1·41 (1·26-1·59) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident diabetes-related microvascular disease; 1·35 (1·11-1·64) in the medium SDH group and 1·76 (1·46-2·13) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident dementia; and 1·02 (0·92-1·13) in the medium SDH group and 1·17 (1·05-1·30) in the unfavourable SDH group for incident cancer in the UK Biobank cohort (p<0·010 for each category). At the age of 45 years, the mean life expectancy of participants was 1·6 years (0·6-2·3) shorter in the medium SDH group and 4·4 years (3·3-5·4) shorter in the unfavourable SDH group than in the favourable SDH group in the UK Biobank. In the US NHAHES cohort, the life expectancy was 1·7 years (0·6-2·7) shorter in the medium SDH group and 3·0 years (1·8-4·3) shorter in the unfavourable SDH group, compared with the favourable group.
Combined unfavourable SDHs were associated with a greater loss of life expectancy and higher risks of developing future adverse health outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes. These associations were similar across two nationwide cohorts from varied social contexts, and were largely consistent across populations with different demographic, lifestyle, and clinical features. Thus, assessing the combined SDHs of individuals with type 2 diabetes might be a promising approach to incorporate into diabetes care to identify socially vulnerable groups and reduce disease burden.
The National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National Key R&D Program of China, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
社会决定因素(SDH)是可预防的健康不平等的主要驱动因素,SDH 与 2 型糖尿病个体的健康结果之间的关联仍不清楚。本研究旨在估计英国和美国 2 型糖尿病成年人的综合 SDH 与预期寿命和未来健康风险之间的关联。
在对两项全国性队列研究的分析中,从英国生物银行(2006 年 3 月 13 日至 2010 年 10 月 1 日,年龄 37-73 岁的成年人)和美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)(1999 年至 2018 年,年龄≥20 岁的成年人)中确定了 2 型糖尿病成年人。将基线时患有 2 型糖尿病的参与者纳入我们的分析。没有 SDH 或随访信息的参与者被排除在外。英国生物银行评估了 17 项 SDH,而美国 NHANES 评估了 10 项 SDH,每项 SDH 分为有利和不利两个层次。SDH 的综合评分是根据每个 SDH 的加权分数计算得出的。然后,参与者被分为三分位(有利、中等和不利 SDH 组)。主要结局是两个队列的预期寿命和死亡率,以及英国生物银行的心血管疾病、糖尿病相关微血管疾病、痴呆和癌症的发病率。结果来自英国生物银行的疾病登记处,截至 2021 年 12 月 31 日,在美国 NHANES 队列中截至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。
我们纳入了来自英国生物银行队列的 17321 名参与者(中位年龄 61.0 岁[IQR 56.0-65.0];6028 名[34.8%]女性和 11293 名[65.2%]男性)和来自 NHANES 队列的 7885 名参与者(平均年龄 59.2 岁[95%CI 58.7-59.6];3835 名[49.1%,加权]女性和 4050 名[50.9%,加权]男性)。在英国生物银行中,记录了 3235 例死亡(中位随访 12.3 年[IQR 11.5-13.2])、3010 例心血管疾病事件(12.1 年[10.8-13.0])、1997 例糖尿病相关微血管疾病(8.0 年[7.1-8.9])、773 例痴呆症(12.6 年[11.8-13.5])和 2259 例癌症病例(11.3 年[10.4-12.2]);而美国 NHANES 在中位随访 7.0 年(3.7-11.2)期间记录了 2278 例死亡。经过多变量调整后,与有利 SDH 组相比,英国生物银行队列中 SDH 中等组的风险比为 1.33(95%CI 1.21-1.46),不利 SDH 组为 1.89(1.72-2.07);1.51(1.34-1.70)在英国生物银行队列中,中低 SDH 组和 2.02(1.75-2.33)在高 SDH 组中,全因死亡率为 1.13(1.04-1.24);1.13(1.01-1.27)在中低 SDH 组和 1.41(1.26-1.59)在高 SDH 组中,心血管疾病发生率为 1.13(1.01-1.27);1.35(1.11-1.64)在中低 SDH 组和 1.76(1.46-2.13)在高 SDH 组中,糖尿病相关微血管疾病发生率为 1.35(1.11-1.64);1.02(0.92-1.13)在中低 SDH 组和 1.17(1.05-1.30)在高 SDH 组中,癌症发生率为 1.02(0.92-1.13)。在 45 岁时,与有利 SDH 组相比,英国生物银行队列中中低 SDH 组参与者的预期寿命平均缩短 1.6 年(0.6-2.3),而高 SDH 组则缩短 4.4 年(3.3-5.4)。在美国 NHANES 队列中,中低 SDH 组的预期寿命缩短 1.7 年(0.6-2.7),而高 SDH 组缩短 3.0 年(1.8-4.3)。
综合不利的 SDH 与 2 型糖尿病成年人预期寿命的更大损失和未来发生不良健康结局的风险增加有关。这些关联在来自不同社会背景的两个全国性队列中基本一致,并且在具有不同人口统计学、生活方式和临床特征的人群中基本一致。因此,评估 2 型糖尿病患者的综合 SDH 可能是一种很有前途的方法,可以纳入糖尿病护理中,以识别社会弱势群体并减轻疾病负担。
国家自然科学基金、国家重点研发计划和中央高校基本科研业务费。