Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Sep 2;34(9):1349-1358. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005597.
The objective of this study was to assess the oncologic outcome of surgically-treated patients with early-stage, intermediate-risk cervical cancer according to postoperative therapy modality.
This retrospective cohort study queried the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group's nationwide surgical data platform. The study population was 1084 patients with stage IB cervical cancer who underwent primary radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 2004 to 2008. Histology type-incorporated intermediate-risk factor patterns were clustered into three groups based on recurrence risk. Oncologic outcomes were assessed per postoperative therapy: external beam radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and no treatment.
Histology-incorporated intermediate-risk groups included: no lympho-vascular space invasion in any histology, or squamous cell carcinoma with lympho-vascular space invasion but no deep stromal invasion (n=559, 51.6%, group 1); squamous cell carcinoma with both lympho-vascular space invasion and deep cervical stromal invasion (n=281, 25.9%; group 2); and non-squamous histology with lympho-vascular space invasion (n=244, 22.5%; group 3). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 93.3%, 89.3%, and 82.5% for group 1,-2, and -3, respectively (p<0.001), with group 3 exhibiting an almost three-fold increased recurrence risk compared with group 1 (adjusted-hazard ratio (aHR) 2.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70-4.32), followed by group 2 (aHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.75). Disease-free survival was similar across the postoperative therapy groups: 5 year rates for external beam radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and no postoperative treatment, 94.8%, 87.2%, 93.6%, and 94.2% for group 1 (p=0.294); 85.0%, 93.3%, 87.3%, and 90.5% for group 2 (p=0.578); and 85.4%, 83.1%, 80.5%, and 83.3% for group 3 (p=0.876). The aHR for disease-free survival comparing no postoperative treatment to external beam radiotherapy alone was 1.10 (95% CI 0.37 to 3.28), 0.71 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.79), and 1.21 (95% CI 0.42 to 3.51) for group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively. The observed exposure-outcome associations were similar for cause-specific survival (all, p>0.05).
In this retrospective investigation in Japan, active surveillance without postoperative therapy following radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy was not associated with oncologic outcome in early-stage, intermediate-risk cervical cancer.
本研究旨在根据术后治疗方式评估接受早期、中危宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的患者的肿瘤学结局。
本回顾性队列研究查询了日本妇科肿瘤学组的全国性手术数据平台。研究人群为 2004 年至 2008 年间接受原发性根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的 1084 例 IB 期宫颈癌患者。基于复发风险,将包含组织学中间风险因素的模式聚类为三组。根据术后治疗方法评估肿瘤学结局:单纯外照射放疗、同期放化疗、单纯化疗和无治疗。
包含中间风险因素的组织学分组包括:任何组织学中均无淋巴血管空间侵犯,或鳞状细胞癌伴淋巴血管空间侵犯但无深层子宫颈基质侵犯(n=559,51.6%,组 1);伴淋巴血管空间侵犯和深层子宫颈基质侵犯的鳞状细胞癌(n=281,25.9%,组 2);伴淋巴血管空间侵犯的非鳞状组织学(n=244,22.5%,组 3)。组 1、-2 和 -3 的 5 年无病生存率分别为 93.3%、89.3%和 82.5%(p<0.001),组 3 的复发风险几乎是组 1 的三倍(调整后风险比[aHR]2.70,95%置信区间[CI]1.70-4.32),其次是组 2(aHR 1.67,95%CI 1.01-2.75)。不同术后治疗组的无病生存率相似:单纯外照射放疗、同期放化疗、单纯化疗和无术后治疗组的 5 年生存率分别为组 1 的 94.8%、87.2%、93.6%和 94.2%(p=0.294);组 2 的 85.0%、93.3%、87.3%和 90.5%(p=0.578);组 3 的 85.4%、83.1%、80.5%和 83.3%(p=0.876)。与单纯外照射放疗相比,无术后治疗的疾病无进展生存率的 aHR 分别为组 1 的 1.10(95%CI 0.37-3.28)、组 2 的 0.71(95%CI 0.29-1.79)和组 3 的 1.21(95%CI 0.42-3.51)。对于特定疾病的生存,观察到的暴露-结局关联在所有组中均相似(均,p>0.05)。
在日本的这项回顾性研究中,在根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术后不进行术后治疗的主动监测与早期中危宫颈癌的肿瘤学结局无关。