Metwally Ahmed A, Perelman Dalia, Park Heyjun, Wu Yue, Jha Alokkumar, Sharp Seth, Celli Alessandra, Ayhan Ekrem, Abbasi Fahim, Gloyn Anna L, McLaughlin Tracey, Snyder Michael
Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 9:2024.07.20.24310737. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.20.24310737.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and prediabetes are classically defined by the level of fasting glucose or surrogates such as hemoglobin HbA1c. This classification does not take into account the heterogeneity in the pathophysiology of glucose dysregulation, the identification of which could inform targeted approaches to diabetes treatment and prevention and/or predict clinical outcomes. We performed gold-standard metabolic tests in a cohort of individuals with early glucose dysregulation and quantified four distinct metabolic subphenotypes known to contribute to glucose dysregulation and T2D: muscle insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, impaired incretin action, and hepatic insulin resistance. We revealed substantial inter-individual heterogeneity, with 34% of individuals exhibiting dominance or co-dominance in muscle and/or liver IR, and 40% exhibiting dominance or co-dominance in β-cell and/or incretin deficiency. Further, with a frequently-sampled oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), we developed a novel machine learning framework to predict metabolic subphenotypes using features from the dynamic patterns of the glucose time-series ("shape of the glucose curve"). The glucose time-series features identified insulin resistance, β-cell deficiency, and incretin defect with auROCs of 95%, 89%, and 88%, respectively. These figures are superior to currently-used estimates. The prediction of muscle insulin resistance and β-cell deficiency were validated using an independent cohort. We then tested the ability of glucose curves generated by a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) worn during at-home OGTTs to predict insulin resistance and β-cell deficiency, yielding auROC of 88% and 84%, respectively. We thus demonstrate that the prediabetic state is characterized by metabolic heterogeneity, which can be defined by the shape of the glucose curve during standardized OGTT, performed in a clinical research unit or at-home setting using CGM. The use of at-home CGM to identify muscle insulin resistance and β-cell deficiency constitutes a practical and scalable method by which to risk stratify individuals with early glucose dysregulation and inform targeted treatment to prevent T2D.
2型糖尿病(T2D)和糖尿病前期传统上是通过空腹血糖水平或诸如血红蛋白HbA1c等替代指标来定义的。这种分类没有考虑到葡萄糖调节异常病理生理学中的异质性,而识别这种异质性可以为糖尿病治疗和预防的靶向方法提供信息和/或预测临床结果。我们对一组早期葡萄糖调节异常的个体进行了金标准代谢测试,并量化了四种已知会导致葡萄糖调节异常和T2D的不同代谢亚表型:肌肉胰岛素抵抗、β细胞功能障碍、肠促胰岛素作用受损和肝脏胰岛素抵抗。我们发现个体间存在显著的异质性,34%的个体在肌肉和/或肝脏胰岛素抵抗方面表现为主导或共同主导,40%的个体在β细胞和/或肠促胰岛素缺乏方面表现为主导或共同主导。此外,通过频繁采样的口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),我们开发了一种新颖的机器学习框架,利用葡萄糖时间序列的动态模式(“葡萄糖曲线的形状”)特征来预测代谢亚表型。葡萄糖时间序列特征识别胰岛素抵抗、β细胞缺乏和肠促胰岛素缺陷的曲线下面积(auROC)分别为95%、89%和88%。这些数字优于目前使用的估计值。肌肉胰岛素抵抗和β细胞缺乏的预测在一个独立队列中得到了验证。然后,我们测试了在家中进行OGTT期间佩戴的连续血糖监测仪(CGM)生成的葡萄糖曲线预测胰岛素抵抗和β细胞缺乏的能力,auROC分别为88%和84%。因此,我们证明糖尿病前期状态的特征是代谢异质性,这可以通过在临床研究单位或在家中使用CGM进行标准化OGTT期间的葡萄糖曲线形状来定义。使用家用CGM识别肌肉胰岛素抵抗和β细胞缺乏构成了一种实用且可扩展的方法,通过这种方法可以对早期葡萄糖调节异常的个体进行风险分层,并为预防T2D的靶向治疗提供信息。