• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

那些输不起的人在哪里?竞争性威权主义、现任者失败与赞比亚2021年选举中的选举信任

Where Are the Sore Losers? Competitive Authoritarianism, Incumbent Defeat, and Electoral Trust in Zambia's 2021 Election.

作者信息

Kerr Nicholas, Krönke Matthias, Wahman Michael

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, US.

Researcher, Institute for Democracy, Citizenship and Public Policy in Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):608-631. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae030. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/poq/nfae030
PMID:39109091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11300037/
Abstract

How do electoral turnovers shape citizen perceptions of election quality in competitive authoritarian regimes? We argue that electoral outcomes are crucial for determining perceptions of electoral quality. While detailed evaluation of electoral trust is complex in competitive autocracies with institutional uncertainty and polarized electoral environments, turnovers send strong and unequivocal signals about election quality. Previous literature has noted a strong partisan divide in electoral trust in competitive authoritarian regimes, but turnovers can boost trust among both incumbent and opposition supporters. We test this argument in the case of Zambia's 2021 election, a case where a ruling party lost despite electoral manipulation and strong control over the Election Management Body (EMB). Empirically, we leverage the first-ever panel survey carried out during Zambian elections. Comparing trust in elections before and after the election, we find that perceived election quality increased after the 2021 electoral turnover among both losers and winners. We find that trust in elections increased the most among winning opposition supporters. Moreover, despite the outgoing president's attempt to portray the election as fraudulent, losing ruling-party supporters also increased their trust in elections after the turnover. The study has important implications for the literature on democratic consolidation and institutional trust.

摘要

在竞争型威权政权中,选举更替如何塑造公民对选举质量的认知?我们认为,选举结果对于决定对选举质量的认知至关重要。虽然在存在制度不确定性和两极分化选举环境的竞争型独裁政权中,对选举信任的详细评估很复杂,但更替会发出关于选举质量的强烈且明确的信号。以往文献指出,在竞争型威权政权中,选举信任存在强烈的党派分歧,但更替可以提高现任者和反对派支持者双方的信任。我们以赞比亚2021年选举为例来检验这一论点,在该案例中,执政党尽管进行了选举操纵并对选举管理机构(EMB)有强大控制,但仍输掉了选举。从实证角度看,我们利用了赞比亚选举期间进行的首次面板调查。比较选举前后对选举的信任,我们发现,2021年选举更替后,无论是失败者还是胜利者,对选举质量的认知都有所提高。我们发现,获胜的反对派支持者中对选举的信任增加最多。此外,尽管即将离任的总统试图将选举描绘为欺诈性的,但失败的执政党支持者在更替后也增加了对选举的信任。该研究对民主巩固和制度信任的文献具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/ee7cd8a172bf/nfae030f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/0a7b1aaef7ee/nfae030f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/d55ab203949a/nfae030f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/31d197f3dae5/nfae030f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/fdb7a9d69aef/nfae030f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/ee7cd8a172bf/nfae030f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/0a7b1aaef7ee/nfae030f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/d55ab203949a/nfae030f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/31d197f3dae5/nfae030f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/fdb7a9d69aef/nfae030f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/11300037/ee7cd8a172bf/nfae030f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Where Are the Sore Losers? Competitive Authoritarianism, Incumbent Defeat, and Electoral Trust in Zambia's 2021 Election.那些输不起的人在哪里?竞争性威权主义、现任者失败与赞比亚2021年选举中的选举信任
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):608-631. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae030. eCollection 2024.
2
Institutionalising electoral uncertainty and authoritarian regime survival.将选举不确定性和威权政权存续制度化。
Eur J Polit Res. 2020 May;59(2):465-487. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12355. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.多疑的选民:美国大选意外结果、感知的选举公正性与对民主的满意度
Polit Res Q. 2023 Dec;76(4):1589-1603. doi: 10.1177/10659129231166679. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
The Dynamics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democracies: Election Timing, Blatant Fraud, and the Legitimacy of Governance.民主国家中选举操纵与制度信任的动态:选举时间、公然舞弊与治理的合法性
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 11;88(SI):472-494. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae022. eCollection 2024.
5
Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders.专制化外溢:当选举出一个独裁者时对跨境选举信任的侵蚀
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jun 26;88(SI):828-842. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae018. eCollection 2024.
6
Meddling in the 2016 Elections and Satisfaction With Democracy in the US.干预2016年美国大选与美国民众对民主的满意度
Polit Stud (Oxf). 2024 May;72(2):505-526. doi: 10.1177/00323217221126300. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
7
The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.选举舞弊的代价:建立选举公正性、赢得选举与对民主满意度之间的联系。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2017 Jul 3;27(3):350-368. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Closest to the People? Incumbency Advantage and the Personal Vote in Non-Partisan Elections.最贴近民众?无党派选举中的在职优势与个人选票
Polit Res Q. 2022 Mar;75(1):188-202. doi: 10.1177/1065912921990751. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
Life Satisfaction and Incumbent Voting: Examining the Mediating Effect of Trust in Government.生活满意度与在职投票:审视对政府信任的中介作用
J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(6):2947-2967. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00536-z. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.对查韦斯总统任期内委内瑞拉选举的法医分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 27;9(6):e100884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100884. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
The forensics of fraud: Evidence from the 2018 Brazilian presidential election.欺诈的取证:来自2018年巴西总统选举的证据。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Sep 7;5:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100286. eCollection 2022.
2
The case for motivated reasoning.动机性推理的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):480-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.