• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民主国家中选举操纵与制度信任的动态:选举时间、公然舞弊与治理的合法性

The Dynamics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democracies: Election Timing, Blatant Fraud, and the Legitimacy of Governance.

作者信息

Higashijima Masaaki, Kadoya Hisashi, Yanai Yuki

机构信息

Associate Professor, Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 11;88(SI):472-494. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae022. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/poq/nfae022
PMID:39109089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11300039/
Abstract

This paper explores the dynamic relationship between electoral manipulation and popular trust in political institutions. Governments often manipulate election results by resorting to electoral fraud. They also tilt the electoral field by opportunistically deciding when to hold elections, in other words, election timing maneuvering. How do these two different types of electoral manipulation affect citizens' trust in the government, legislature, and election management bodies (EMBs)? We suggest that although the short-term effects of election timing manipulation are unclear due to its ambiguous nature as an electioneering strategy, substantial electoral margins created by timing maneuvering facilitate smooth decision-making, leading to boosting trust in the government and legislature over the long run. In contrast, as electoral fraud is an unambiguous form of manipulation, it may undermine trust in the government and parliament, although such effects may not last. By combining an original dataset of election timing with existing survey data comprising 335,000 citizens from fifty-eight democratic countries, we find evidence in support of our theoretical expectations.

摘要

本文探讨了选举操纵与民众对政治机构信任之间的动态关系。政府常常通过选举舞弊来操纵选举结果。他们还会通过机会主义地决定选举时间(即选举时间操纵)来倾斜选举局面。这两种不同类型的选举操纵如何影响公民对政府、立法机构和选举管理机构(EMB)的信任呢?我们认为,尽管由于选举时间操纵作为一种竞选策略的性质模糊,其短期影响尚不清楚,但通过时间操纵创造的大幅选举优势有助于顺利决策,从长远来看会增强对政府和立法机构的信任。相比之下,由于选举舞弊是一种明确的操纵形式,它可能会破坏对政府和议会的信任,尽管这种影响可能不会持久。通过将一个关于选举时间的原始数据集与包含来自58个民主国家的33.5万名公民的现有调查数据相结合,我们找到了支持我们理论预期的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/ef0f947cee56/nfae022f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/2095ba1388e3/nfae022f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/e953a6e37dae/nfae022f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/ed8c4f6cde0d/nfae022f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/ef0f947cee56/nfae022f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/2095ba1388e3/nfae022f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/e953a6e37dae/nfae022f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/ed8c4f6cde0d/nfae022f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05d/11300039/ef0f947cee56/nfae022f4.jpg

相似文献

1
The Dynamics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democracies: Election Timing, Blatant Fraud, and the Legitimacy of Governance.民主国家中选举操纵与制度信任的动态:选举时间、公然舞弊与治理的合法性
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 11;88(SI):472-494. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae022. eCollection 2024.
2
Where Are the Sore Losers? Competitive Authoritarianism, Incumbent Defeat, and Electoral Trust in Zambia's 2021 Election.那些输不起的人在哪里?竞争性威权主义、现任者失败与赞比亚2021年选举中的选举信任
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):608-631. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae030. eCollection 2024.
3
Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders.专制化外溢:当选举出一个独裁者时对跨境选举信任的侵蚀
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jun 26;88(SI):828-842. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae018. eCollection 2024.
4
The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.选举舞弊的代价:建立选举公正性、赢得选举与对民主满意度之间的联系。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2017 Jul 3;27(3):350-368. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.多疑的选民:美国大选意外结果、感知的选举公正性与对民主的满意度
Polit Res Q. 2023 Dec;76(4):1589-1603. doi: 10.1177/10659129231166679. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.对 2023 年土耳其总统选举的法医分析显示,偏远地区的选票出现极端波动。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0293239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293239. eCollection 2023.
7
Election forensics: Using machine learning and synthetic data for possible election anomaly detection.选举取证:使用机器学习和合成数据进行可能的选举异常检测。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0223950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223950. eCollection 2019.
8
Distrusting the Process: Electoral Trust, Operational Ideology, and Nonvoting Political Participation in the 2020 American Electorate.对选举过程的不信任:2020年美国选民中的选举信任、运作理念与非投票政治参与
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):843-857. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae025. eCollection 2024.
9
Peace engineering: The contribution of blockchain systems to the e-voting process.和平工程:区块链系统对电子投票过程的贡献。
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Jan;162:120397. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120397. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
The principal components of electoral regimes: separating autocracies from pseudo-democracies.选举制度的主要组成部分:区分独裁政权与伪民主政权。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 9;11(10):240262. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240262. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously.政治信任与成熟度:认真对待测量
Soc Indic Res. 2017;130(1):415-434. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1182-4. Epub 2015 Nov 20.