• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专制化外溢:当选举出一个独裁者时对跨境选举信任的侵蚀

Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders.

作者信息

Chan Ka Ming

机构信息

Lecturer (Assistant Professor), School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2024 Jun 26;88(SI):828-842. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae018. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/poq/nfae018
PMID:39109088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11300036/
Abstract

The rich literature on election trust predominantly uses domestic determinants as explanatory factors. But given the international nature of the autocratization wave, can an autocratization event across borders erode election trust? This article argues that an authoritarian's electoral success in a neighboring country can shatter democratic norms and demonstrate the viability of authoritarians. This autocratization event abroad can thus reduce citizens' principled support for democracy and its political system. Consequently, citizens across borders are less likely to see democratic elections as the "only game in town" and they have less trust in elections. To test this idea, I study the spillover effects of the 2018 Brazilian presidential election, in which an authoritarian candidate won decisively. Using the AmericasBarometer in Colombia that was launched throughout this election, I find that the election trust of Colombian citizens erodes after Jair Bolsonaro's electoral success. To probe into the mechanism, I uncover that his electoral victory leads Colombian citizens to be less supportive of the domestic political system and reduces their principled support for democracy. The causal mediation analysis demonstrates that these two variables mediate the effect of the authoritarian's electoral success on election trust. These findings on autocratization spillover effects illustrate the importance of external autocratization events in the study of election trust.

摘要

关于选举信任的丰富文献主要将国内因素作为解释变量。但鉴于威权化浪潮的国际性,跨境的威权化事件会侵蚀选举信任吗?本文认为,一个独裁者在邻国的选举成功会破坏民主规范,并证明独裁者的可行性。因此,国外的这种威权化事件会减少公民对民主及其政治制度的原则性支持。结果,跨境的公民不太可能将民主选举视为“城里唯一的游戏”,他们对选举的信任也会减少。为了验证这一观点,我研究了2018年巴西总统选举的溢出效应,在这次选举中,一位独裁候选人决定性地获胜。利用在整个选举期间开展的哥伦比亚美洲晴雨表,我发现雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗选举成功后,哥伦比亚公民的选举信任受到侵蚀。为了探究其中的机制,我发现他的选举胜利导致哥伦比亚公民对国内政治制度的支持减少,并降低了他们对民主的原则性支持。因果中介分析表明,这两个变量介导了独裁者选举成功对选举信任的影响。这些关于威权化溢出效应的发现说明了外部威权化事件在选举信任研究中的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/9f198cd8e1cf/nfae018f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/839692e7657d/nfae018f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/ba38f0032951/nfae018f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/9f198cd8e1cf/nfae018f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/839692e7657d/nfae018f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/ba38f0032951/nfae018f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6376/11300036/9f198cd8e1cf/nfae018f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders.专制化外溢:当选举出一个独裁者时对跨境选举信任的侵蚀
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jun 26;88(SI):828-842. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae018. eCollection 2024.
2
Where Are the Sore Losers? Competitive Authoritarianism, Incumbent Defeat, and Electoral Trust in Zambia's 2021 Election.那些输不起的人在哪里?竞争性威权主义、现任者失败与赞比亚2021年选举中的选举信任
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):608-631. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae030. eCollection 2024.
3
Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.多疑的选民:美国大选意外结果、感知的选举公正性与对民主的满意度
Polit Res Q. 2023 Dec;76(4):1589-1603. doi: 10.1177/10659129231166679. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
The Dynamics of Electoral Manipulation and Institutional Trust in Democracies: Election Timing, Blatant Fraud, and the Legitimacy of Governance.民主国家中选举操纵与制度信任的动态:选举时间、公然舞弊与治理的合法性
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 11;88(SI):472-494. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae022. eCollection 2024.
5
Distrusting the Process: Electoral Trust, Operational Ideology, and Nonvoting Political Participation in the 2020 American Electorate.对选举过程的不信任:2020年美国选民中的选举信任、运作理念与非投票政治参与
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):843-857. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae025. eCollection 2024.
6
Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.精英言论可能会破坏民主规范。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 8;118(23). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024125118.
7
The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.选举舞弊的代价:建立选举公正性、赢得选举与对民主满意度之间的联系。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2017 Jul 3;27(3):350-368. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
The Electoral Misinformation Nexus: How News Consumption, Platform Use, and Trust in News Influence Belief in Electoral Misinformation.选举错误信息关联:新闻消费、平台使用以及对新闻的信任如何影响对选举错误信息的相信程度
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 22;88(SI):681-707. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae019. eCollection 2024.
9
Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success.全球选举活动中的消极情绪、情绪化和民粹主义言论,及其对媒体关注度和选举成功的影响。
Eur J Commun. 2019 Aug;34(4):410-444. doi: 10.1177/0267323119861875. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.对 2023 年土耳其总统选举的法医分析显示,偏远地区的选票出现极端波动。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0293239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293239. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
If I'll win it, I want it: The role of instrumental considerations in explaining public support for referendums.如果我能赢得它,我想要它:工具性考量在解释公众对公投的支持方面的作用。
Eur J Polit Res. 2020 May;59(2):312-330. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12358. Epub 2019 Oct 14.