Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Performance Analysis & Technology, Royal Dutch Football Association (KNVB, Koninklijke Nederlandse Voetbalbond), Zeist, The Netherlands.
J Sports Sci. 2024 Jul;42(13):1224-1231. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2387969. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Most studies on deception in soccer penalty kicks have focused on the deceptive actions used by penalty takers. However, it is worth noting that deception can also be played out by goalkeepers. To examine the effectiveness of goalkeepers' deceptive actions in professional competition, we analysed 714 penalty kicks taken during matches in the English Premier League and German Bundesliga, spanning the seasons from 2016-2017 to 2019-2020. We scored whether goalkeepers used deception, and if so, what type of deception, the outcome of the penalty and the kicking strategy of the penalty taker. The results showed that goalkeepers used deception in half of the penalty kicks, resulting in significantly less goals compared to penalties without deception. This advantage was similar for the different types of deception, but larger when penalty takers paid attention to goalkeepers. We propose that the deceptive actions by goalkeepers are effective, mainly because it leads the penalty taker to lose focus. The practical implications of these findings are discussed for both goalkeepers and penalty takers.
大多数关于足球点球欺骗行为的研究都集中在罚球者使用的欺骗动作上。然而,值得注意的是,守门员也可以进行欺骗。为了研究守门员在职业比赛中的欺骗行为的有效性,我们分析了 2016-2017 赛季至 2019-2020 赛季期间在英超联赛和德甲联赛中进行的 714 次点球。我们对守门员是否使用了欺骗手段,以及如果使用了,是哪种类型的欺骗,点球的结果以及罚球者的罚球策略进行了评分。结果表明,守门员在一半的点球中使用了欺骗手段,与没有欺骗的点球相比,进球明显减少。不同类型的欺骗效果相似,但当罚球者注意到守门员时,效果更大。我们提出守门员的欺骗行为是有效的,主要是因为它会导致罚球者失去注意力。这些发现对守门员和罚球者都有实际意义。