Dicks Matt, Button Chris, Davids Keith
Institute of Cognitive and Team/Racket Sport Research, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Mongersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Perception. 2010;39(8):1111-24. doi: 10.1068/p6442.
A pressing concern within the literature on anticipatory perceptual-motor behaviour is the lack of clarity on the applicability of data, observed under video-simulation task constraints, to actual performance in which actions are coupled to perception, as captured during in-situ experimental conditions. We developed an in-situ experimental paradigm which manipulated the duration of anticipatory visual information from a penalty taker's actions to examine experienced goalkeepers' vulnerability to deception for the penalty kick in association football. Irrespective of the penalty taker's kick strategy, goalkeepers initiated movement responses earlier across consecutively earlier presentation points. Overall goalkeeping performance was better in non-deception trials than in deception conditions. In deception trials, the kinematic information presented up until the penalty taker initiated his/her kicking action had a negative effect on goalkeepers' performance. It is concluded that goalkeepers are likely to benefit from not anticipating a penalty taker's performance outcome based on information from the run-up, in preference to later information that emerges just before the initiation of the penalty taker's kicking action.
在关于预期感知运动行为的文献中,一个紧迫的问题是,在视频模拟任务限制下观察到的数据,对于实际表现(即在现场实验条件下捕捉到的行动与感知相结合的表现)的适用性缺乏明确性。我们开发了一种现场实验范式,该范式操纵了罚球者动作的预期视觉信息持续时间,以检验有经验的守门员在足球点球中对欺骗的易感性。无论罚球者的罚球策略如何,守门员在连续更早的呈现点上更早地启动了动作反应。总体而言,在非欺骗试验中的守门表现优于欺骗条件下的表现。在欺骗试验中,直到罚球者开始其踢球动作之前呈现的运动学信息对守门员的表现有负面影响。得出的结论是,守门员不太可能从基于助跑信息预测罚球者的表现结果中受益,而更倾向于罚球者开始踢球动作之前出现的较晚信息。