• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年精神病学中人格问题严重程度指数-短式:信度和效度。

Severity Indices of Personality Problems-Short Form in Old-Age Psychiatry: Reliability and Validity.

机构信息

Mondriaan Institute for Mental Healthcare, Heerlen, Netherlands.

Department of Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):174-182. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1743710. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2020.1743710
PMID:32267173
Abstract

The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP; Verheul et al., 2008) is a popular self-report questionnaire that measures severity of maladaptive personality functioning. Two studies demonstrated the utility of the short form (SIPP-SF) among older adults but validation in clinical settings is lacking. Therefore, we examined the psychometric properties of the SIPP-SF in a large sample of older adult Dutch outpatients (= 124; age range = 60-85 years,  = 69.8,  = 5.3). The SIPP-SF domains showed good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .75-.91) and effectively discriminated between participants with and without a personality disorder, as assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Convergent validity of the SIPP-SF was examined with instruments for measuring personality pathology among older adults (Informant Personality questionnaire [HAP]; Gerontological Personality Disorders Scale [GPS]). The GPS generally correlated with the SIPP-SF domains in expected directions, with small to large effect sizes. For the HAP, only 1 scale correlated with all SIPP-SF domains. No associations were found between the SIPP-SF and psychiatric symptomatology as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The SIPP-SF appears to be a promising instrument for assessing maladaptive personality functioning among older adult outpatients.

摘要

人格问题严重程度指数(SIPP;Verheul 等人,2008 年)是一种流行的自陈式问卷,用于衡量适应不良的人格功能的严重程度。两项研究表明,短式(SIPP-SF)在老年人中具有实用性,但在临床环境中的验证不足。因此,我们在一个大型的老年荷兰门诊患者样本中(=124;年龄范围为 60-85 岁,=69.8,=5.3)检验了 SIPP-SF 的心理测量特性。SIPP-SF 各领域具有良好到优秀的内部一致性(克朗巴赫的α=.75-.91),并且能够有效地区分有和没有人格障碍的参与者,这是通过 DSM-IV 轴 II 人格障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)评估的。SIPP-SF 的聚合效度通过评估老年人人格病理的工具进行了检验(知情人格问卷[HAP];老年人格障碍量表[GPS])。GPS 通常与 SIPP-SF 各领域以预期的方向相关,具有小到大量表型。对于 HAP,只有 1 个量表与所有 SIPP-SF 领域相关。SIPP-SF 与Brief Symptom Inventory(BSI)测量的精神症状之间没有关联。SIPP-SF 似乎是评估老年门诊患者适应不良人格功能的一种很有前途的工具。

相似文献

1
Severity Indices of Personality Problems-Short Form in Old-Age Psychiatry: Reliability and Validity.老年精神病学中人格问题严重程度指数-短式:信度和效度。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):174-182. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1743710. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Measuring personality functioning in older adults: construct validity of the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning - Short Form (SIPP-SF).测量老年人的人格功能:人格功能严重程度指数简表(SIPP-SF)的结构效度。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jul;21(7):703-711. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1154012. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF).用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格功能水平量表(LPFS)的简短自评问卷的编制与初步心理测量学评估:LPFS简表(LPFS-BF)
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):192-7. doi: 10.1037/per0000159. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118) in adolescents: reliability and validity.青少年人格问题严重程度指数(SIPP-118):信度和效度。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):646-55. doi: 10.1037/a0022995.
5
Age-Neutrality of a Brief Assessment of the Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in Older Adults.老年人群体人格障碍第三节替代模型的简要评估的年龄中立性。
Assessment. 2018 Apr;25(3):310-323. doi: 10.1177/1073191118754706. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): development, factor structure, reliability, and validity.人格问题严重程度指数(SIPP - 118):编制、因素结构、信度和效度
Psychol Assess. 2008 Mar;20(1):23-34. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.23.
7
The Norwegian Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder-Static Form (CAT-PD-SF): Reliability, Factor Structure, and Relationships With Personality Functioning.挪威人格障碍静态形式计算机化自适应测验(CAT-PD-SF):信度、因子结构及与人格功能的关系。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):585-595. doi: 10.1177/1073191117749296. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning.人格功能水平量表-简式 2.0:评估人格功能水平的简短工具的更新。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):3-14. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1434. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
9
Measuring Personality Problems in Patients With Substance Use Disorders: A Cross-Sample Validation.测量物质使用障碍患者的人格问题:跨样本验证。
J Dual Diagn. 2019 Oct-Dec;15(4):324-332. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1668583. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
10
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Dutch Norms, T-scores, and Percentile Rank Scores.人格问题严重程度指数(SIPP - 118):荷兰常模、T分数和百分等级分数
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Aug;19(3):e70030. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70030.
2
The Effects of Covert Narcissism on Chinese College Students Cyberbullying: The Mediation of Hostile Attribution Bias and the Moderation of Self-Control.隐性自恋对中国大学生网络欺凌的影响:敌意归因偏差的中介作用与自我控制的调节作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jun 27;16:2353-2366. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S416902. eCollection 2023.
3
Impact of personality functioning and pathological traits on mental wellbeing of older patients with personality disorders.
人格功能和病理特征对老年人格障碍患者心理健康的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03857-8.