Thao My Nguyen Le, Quoc Giang Nguyen, An My Do Thi, Minh Hieu Nguyen, Hong Son Pham, Thai Anh Hoang, Thi Phung Than, Thanh Vy Nguyen Thuy, Thi Ngoc Tran, Minh Thuan Nguyen, Flower Barnaby, Cooke Graham S, Chambers Mary, Van Nuil Jennifer Ilo
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
CBPR Community Advisory Groups, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 7;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00619-6.
Participatory approaches have become a widely applied research approach. Despite their popularity, there are many challenges associated with the evaluation of participatory projects. Here we describe an evaluation of a community-based participatory research study of underserved communities in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam at risk for hepatitis C virus. The goals of our evaluation were to explore the main benefits and challenges of implementing and participating in a participatory study and to describe study impacts.
We conducted two meetings with leaders and members of the participating groups followed by in-depth interviews with 10 participants. We then held a dissemination meeting with over 70 participants, including the representatives of each group, researchers from non-governmental organizations (community-based, national and international), and govenrment officials from the Vietnam Ministry of Health and the Department of Health of HCMC.
Results include four categories where we describe first the participatory impacts, followed by the collaborative impacts. Then we describe the benefits and challenges of creating and belonging to one of the groups, from members' and leaders' points of view. Finally, we describe the key suggestions that participants provided for future research.
In conclusion, the evaluation approach led to both a research reflection on the 'success' of the project and enabled participants themselves to reflect on the outcomes and benefits of the study from their point of view.
参与式方法已成为一种广泛应用的研究方法。尽管其很受欢迎,但参与式项目的评估存在诸多挑战。在此,我们描述了一项针对越南胡志明市(HCMC)丙型肝炎病毒风险较高的弱势群体开展的基于社区的参与式研究的评估。我们评估的目标是探讨实施和参与一项参与式研究的主要益处和挑战,并描述研究的影响。
我们与参与小组的领导人和成员举行了两次会议,随后对10名参与者进行了深入访谈。然后,我们与70多名参与者举行了一次传播会议,其中包括每个小组的代表、非政府组织(社区、国家和国际层面)的研究人员以及越南卫生部和胡志明市卫生局的政府官员。
结果包括四个类别,我们首先描述参与式影响,接着是协作影响。然后,我们从成员和领导者的角度描述创建并归属其中一个小组的益处和挑战。最后,我们描述参与者为未来研究提供的关键建议。
总之,该评估方法既引发了对项目“成功”的研究反思,也使参与者能够从自身角度反思研究的结果和益处。