Department of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland, USA.
Small Animal Clinical Sciences Department in the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
J Morphol. 2024 Aug;285(8):e21759. doi: 10.1002/jmor.21759.
Biological variation in the mammalian skull is the product of a series of factors including changes in gene expression, developmental timing, and environmental pressures. When considering the diversity of extant mammalian crania, it is important to understand these mechanisms that contribute to cranial growth and in turn, how differences in cranial morphology have been attained. Various researchers, including Dr. Sue Herring, have proposed a variety of mechanisms to explain the process of cranial growth. This work has set the foundation on which modern analysis of craniofacial morphology happens today. This study focused on the analysis of modularity in three mammalian taxa, all of which exhibit facial reduction. Specifically, we examined facial reduction as a morphological phenomenon through the use of two-module and six-module modularity hypotheses. We recorded three-dimensional coordinate data for 55 cranial landmarks that allowed us to analyze differences in cranial shape in these three taxa (primates n = 88, bats n = 64, dogs n = 81). When assessing modularity within the two-module modularity hypothesis specifically, dogs exhibited the lowest levels of modularity, while bats and primates both showed a slightly more modular covariance structure. We further assessed modularity in the same sample using the Goswami six-module model, where again dogs exhibited a low degree of modularity, with bats and primates being more moderate. We then broke the sample into subsets by analyzing each morphotype separately. We hypothesized that the modularity would be more pronounced in the brachycephalic morphotype. Surprisingly, we found that in brachycephalic dogs, normocephalic dogs, brachycephalic primates, and normocephalic primates, there was a moderate degree of modularity. Brachycephalic bats had a low degree of modularity, while normocephalic bats were the most modular group observed in this study. Based on these results, it is evident that facial reduction is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon with unique morphological changes observed in each of the three taxa studied.
哺乳动物头骨的生物学变异是一系列因素的产物,包括基因表达的变化、发育时间和环境压力。在考虑现存哺乳动物颅骨的多样性时,了解这些导致颅骨生长的机制以及颅骨形态差异是如何产生的非常重要。包括 Sue Herring 博士在内的各种研究人员提出了各种机制来解释颅骨生长的过程。这项工作为现代颅面形态学分析奠定了基础。本研究集中于分析三个哺乳动物类群的模块性,它们都表现出面部缩小。具体来说,我们通过使用两模块和六模块模块性假设来研究作为形态学现象的面部缩小。我们记录了 55 个颅骨标志的三维坐标数据,使我们能够分析这三个类群(灵长类动物 n=88、蝙蝠 n=64、狗 n=81)的颅骨形状差异。当专门评估两模块模块性假设内的模块性时,狗表现出最低水平的模块性,而蝙蝠和灵长类动物都表现出稍微更模块化的协方差结构。我们进一步使用 Goswami 六模块模型评估了相同样本中的模块性,其中狗再次表现出低程度的模块性,而蝙蝠和灵长类动物则更适中。然后,我们通过分别分析每个形态类型将样本分为子集。我们假设在短头型中,模块性会更加明显。令人惊讶的是,我们发现短头型狗、正常头型狗、短头型灵长类动物和正常头型灵长类动物中,模块性适中。短头型蝙蝠的模块性较低,而正常头型蝙蝠是本研究中观察到的最模块化的群体。基于这些结果,很明显,面部缩小是一个复杂且多方面的现象,在研究的三个类群中每个类群都观察到独特的形态变化。