Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗对比安慰剂用于亚洲既往接受过治疗的肝细胞癌患者的3期研究:来自KEYNOTE-394的健康相关生活质量分析

A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab versus Placebo for Previously Treated Patients from Asia with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Health-Related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-394.

作者信息

Qin Shukui, Fang Weijia, Ren Zhenggang, Ou Shuangyan, Lim Ho Yeong, Zhang Feng, Lee Kin Chung, Choi Hye Jin, Tong Jiandong, Tao Min, Xu Aibing, Cheng Ashley, Lu Chang-Hsien, Chiu Chang-Fang, Abdul Wahid Mohamed Ibrahim, Kamble Shital, Norquist Josephine M, Zhong Wenyan, Li Chen, Chen Zhendong

机构信息

GI Cancer Center, Nanjing Tianyinshan Hospital, Nanjing, China.

The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Liver Cancer. 2024 Jan 10;13(4):389-400. doi: 10.1159/000535338. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

KEYNOTE-394 showed pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with manageable safety versus placebo for patients from Asia with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We present results on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

HRQoL was evaluated using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires. Key HRQoL endpoints were least squares mean (LSM) score changes from baseline to week 12 and time to deterioration (TTD) for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL. values were one-sided and nominal without adjustment for multiplicity.

RESULTS

The HRQoL population included patients randomly assigned to pembrolizumab ( 298) and placebo ( 152). From baseline to week 12, a greater decline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was observed with placebo (LSM, -8.4; 95% CI: -11.7 to -5.1) versus pembrolizumab (-4.0; 95% CI: -6.4 to -1.6; difference vs. placebo: 4.4; 95% CI: 0.5-8.4; nominal = 0.0142). Similarly, a greater decline in the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale score was observed with placebo (-6.9; 95% CI: -9.4 to -4.5) versus pembrolizumab (-2.7; 95% CI: -4.5 to -1.0; difference vs. placebo: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.2-7.2; nominal = 0.0030). TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58-1.25; nominal = 0.1993).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving placebo showed a greater decline in HRQoL than those receiving pembrolizumab. Combined with efficacy and safety data from KEYNOTE-394 and the global KEYNOTE-240 and KEYNOTE-224 trials, our data support the clinically meaningful benefit and manageable tolerability of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

摘要

引言

KEYNOTE-394研究表明,对于先前接受过治疗的亚洲晚期肝细胞癌患者,帕博利珠单抗与安慰剂相比,显著改善了总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率,且安全性可控。我们展示了与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)结果。

方法

使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷30(EORTC QLQ-C30)和欧洲五维健康量表3L版(EQ-5D-3L)问卷评估HRQoL。关键的HRQoL终点是EORTC QLQ-C30全球健康状况(GHS)/生活质量从基线到第12周的最小二乘均值(LSM)得分变化以及恶化时间(TTD)。P值为单侧且未针对多重性进行调整。

结果

HRQoL人群包括随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗治疗的患者(n = 298)和接受安慰剂治疗的患者(n = 152)。从基线到第12周,与帕博利珠单抗组相比,安慰剂组EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/生活质量得分下降幅度更大(LSM,-8.4;95%CI:-11.7至-5.1),而帕博利珠单抗组为-4.0;95%CI:-6.4至-1.6;与安慰剂组的差异为4.4;95%CI:0.5 - 8.4;名义P = 0.0142)。同样,与帕博利珠单抗组相比,安慰剂组EQ-5D-3L视觉模拟量表得分下降幅度更大(-6.9;95%CI:-9.4至-4.5),而帕博利珠单抗组为-2.7;95%CI:-4.5至-1.0;与安慰剂组的差异为4.2;95%CI:1.2 - 7.2;名义P = 0.0030)。EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/生活质量得分的TTD在两组之间相似(风险比,0.85;95%CI:0.58 - 1.25;名义P = 0.1993)。

结论

接受安慰剂治疗的患者HRQoL下降幅度大于接受帕博利珠单抗治疗的患者。结合KEYNOTE-394以及全球KEYNOTE-240和KEYNOTE-224试验的疗效和安全性数据,我们的数据支持帕博利珠单抗作为晚期肝细胞癌患者二线治疗具有临床意义的益处和可控的耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea23/11305669/620cef02d6c6/lic-2024-0013-0004-535338_F01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验