• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative.将有效性作为一项社会要务来把握的八种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Jul 12;15(3):100-103. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77727. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Validity as a social imperative for assessment in health professions education: a concept analysis.有效性作为健康职业教育评估的社会必要性：概念分析。
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):641-653. doi: 10.1111/medu.13574.
3
Sound Practices: An Exploratory Study of Building and Monitoring Multiple-Choice Exams at Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Programs.声音实践：加拿大本科医学教育项目中构建和监测多项选择题考试的探索性研究。
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):271-277. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003659.
4
Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings.有效性：一个词有多种含义。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):853-867. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
5
Legitimation Without Argumentation: An Empirical Discourse Analysis of 'Validity as an Argument' in Assessment.无需论证的合法化：评估中“有效性即论证”的实证话语分析。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 3;13(1):469-480. doi: 10.5334/pme.1404. eCollection 2024.
6
How do validity experts conceptualise argumentation? It's a rhetorical question.效度专家如何概念化论证？这是一个反问句。
Med Educ. 2024 Aug;58(8):989-997. doi: 10.1111/medu.15311. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
7
Validity in the Next Era of Assessment: Consequences, Social Impact, and Equity.下一个评估时代的效度：后果、社会影响与公平性
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;13(1):452-459. doi: 10.5334/pme.1150. eCollection 2024.
8
Validity as a social imperative: users' and leaders' perceptions.作为社会要务的有效性：用户与领导者的认知
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Jul 6;13(3):22-36. doi: 10.36834/cmej.73518. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Consequences Validity Evidence: Evaluating the Impact of Educational Assessments.结果有效性证据：评估教育评估的影响。
Acad Med. 2016 Jun;91(6):785-95. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001114.
10
Development and validation of a health profession education-focused scholarly mentorship assessment tool.开发和验证以健康职业教育为重点的学术指导评估工具。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Feb;8(1):43-46. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0491-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing the Next Era in Assessment.开启评估的新时代。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jan 9;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.5334/pme.1551. eCollection 2025.
2
Teaching suicide prevention: a Canadian medical education conundrum.自杀预防教学：加拿大医学教育的难题。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Jul 12;15(3):1-5. doi: 10.36834/cmej.79624. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity as a social imperative: users' and leaders' perceptions.作为社会要务的有效性：用户与领导者的认知
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Jul 6;13(3):22-36. doi: 10.36834/cmej.73518. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Data, Big and Small: Emerging Challenges to Medical Education Scholarship.大数据和小数据：医学教育研究的新挑战
Acad Med. 2019 Jan;94(1):31-36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002465.
3
Validity as a social imperative for assessment in health professions education: a concept analysis.有效性作为健康职业教育评估的社会必要性：概念分析。
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):641-653. doi: 10.1111/medu.13574.
4
Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings.有效性：一个词有多种含义。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):853-867. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
5
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.效度论证的当代方法：凯恩框架实用指南
Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
6
Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.效度：关于评估数据的有意义解释。
Med Educ. 2003 Sep;37(9):830-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.

将有效性作为一项社会要务来把握的八种方法。

Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative.

作者信息

Marceau Mélanie, Young Meredith, Gallagher Frances, St-Onge Christina

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2024 Jul 12;15(3):100-103. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77727. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.36834/cmej.77727
PMID:39114780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11302757/
Abstract

Validity as a social imperative foregrounds the social consequences of assessment and highlights the importance of building quality into the assessment development and monitoring processes. is informed by current assessment trends such as programmatic-, longitudinal-, and rater-based assessment, and is one of the conceptualizations of validity currently at play in the Health Professions Education (HPE) literature. This Black Ice is intended to help readers to get a grip on how to embed principles of in the development and quality monitoring of an assessment. This piece draws on a program of work investigating , key HPE literature, and data generated through stakeholder interviews. We describe eight ways to implement validation practices that align with .

摘要

作为一项社会要务的效度突出了评估的社会后果，并强调在评估开发和监测过程中建立质量的重要性。它受到当前评估趋势的影响，如基于项目、纵向和评分者的评估，并且是目前在健康职业教育（HPE）文献中发挥作用的效度概念之一。这篇《黑冰》旨在帮助读者掌握如何在评估的开发和质量监测中融入效度原则。本文借鉴了一项关于[具体内容缺失]的研究工作项目、关键的HPE文献以及通过利益相关者访谈生成的数据。我们描述了与[具体内容缺失]相一致的实施验证实践的八种方法。