McGann Marek, Lucas Miranda, McHugh Cillian, Barrett Louise
Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College , Limerick V94 VN26, Ireland.
Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge T1K 3M4, Canada.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Sep 23;379(1910):20230282. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0282. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
Trends and developments in recent behavioural and cognitive sciences demonstrate the need for a well-developed theoretical and empirical framework for examining the ecology of human behaviour. The increasing recognition of the role of the environment and interaction with the environment in the organization of behaviour within the cognitive sciences has not been met with an equally disciplined and systematic account of that environment (Heft 2018 . , 99-123 (doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1410045); McGann 2014 , 217-233). Several bodies of work in behavioural ecology, anthropology and ecological psychology provide some frameworks for such an account. At present, however, the most systematic and theoretically disciplined account of the human behavioural ecosystem is that of behaviour settings, as developed by the researchers of the Midwest Psychological Field Station (see Barker 1968 ). The articles in this theme issue provide a critical examination of these theoretical and methodological resources. The collection addresses their theoretical value in connecting with contemporary issues in cognitive science and research practice in psychology, as well as the importance of the methodological specifics of behaviour settings research. Additionally, articles diagnose limitations and identify points of potential extension of both theory and methods, particularly with regard to changes owing to the advance of technology, and the complex relationship between the individual and the collective in behaviour settings work. This article is part of the theme issue 'People, places, things, and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century'.
近期行为科学和认知科学的趋势与发展表明,需要一个完善的理论和实证框架来审视人类行为的生态学。认知科学中对环境在行为组织中的作用以及与环境相互作用的认识日益增加,但对该环境的描述却缺乏同样严谨和系统的阐述(赫夫特,2018年,第99 - 123页,doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1410045;麦甘,2014年,第217 - 233页)。行为生态学、人类学和生态心理学的一些研究成果为此类描述提供了一些框架。然而,目前对人类行为生态系统最系统、理论上最严谨的描述是由中西部心理场站的研究人员提出的行为环境理论(见巴克,1968年)。本专题中的文章对这些理论和方法资源进行了批判性审视。该文集探讨了它们在联系认知科学当代问题和心理学研究实践方面的理论价值,以及行为环境研究方法细节的重要性。此外,文章诊断了局限性,并指出了理论和方法潜在的扩展点,特别是关于技术进步带来的变化,以及行为环境研究中个体与集体之间的复杂关系。本文是“人、地点、事物和社区:21世纪扩展行为环境理论”专题的一部分。