Suppr超能文献

推理的场所。

Places for reasoning.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Literature, Universidad Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 , Ciudad de México, Mexico.

Departments of Philosophy and Psychology, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Sep 23;379(1910):20230294. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0294. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Abstract

In this article, we explore behaviour settings that enable reasoning and the diversity of constraints that not only limit but also make these behaviour settings possible. We focus specifically on reasoning and surveying how behaviour settings allow for the generation of norms of action that are nevertheless differentiated by geographies and sociocultural systems. These geographies and sociocultural systems involve diverse trajectories for reasoning even within similar behaviour settings. We will touch on places for reasoning like Twitter, social movements, traditional knowledge and laboratories set up for experimentation on our reasoning abilities. We will show how these places and the behaviour settings that emerge in them can be studied in terms of the complexity of the interactions between their participants and in terms of enabling constraints. This article is part of the theme issue 'People, places, things, and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century'.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了使推理成为可能的行为环境设置,以及不仅限制而且使这些行为环境设置成为可能的各种约束。我们特别关注推理,并调查行为环境设置如何允许生成行动规范,而这些规范又因地理位置和社会文化系统而有所不同。即使在相似的行为环境中,这些地理位置和社会文化系统也涉及推理的不同轨迹。我们将探讨一些可以进行推理的地方,如 Twitter、社会运动、传统知识以及为测试我们的推理能力而设立的实验室。我们将展示如何根据参与者之间的相互作用的复杂性以及使约束成为可能的条件来研究这些地方和由此产生的行为环境设置。本文是“人与地方、事物和社区:在 21 世纪扩展行为环境设置理论”主题特刊的一部分。

相似文献

1
Places for reasoning.推理的场所。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Sep 23;379(1910):20230294. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0294. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Collective Motion in Human Crowds.人群中的集体运动。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;27(4):232-240. doi: 10.1177/0963721417746743. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Complexity matching in dyadic conversation.对偶对话中的复杂性匹配。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2304-15. doi: 10.1037/xge0000021. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
6
Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony.争论会破坏人际同步。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(11):2092-102. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.853089.
8
The dynamics of perception and action.感知与行动的动态变化。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):358-89. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358.
9
Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation.相互的人际姿势限制参与合作性对话。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):326-332. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验