• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过24小时腹腔液培养区分复杂性与非复杂性急性阑尾炎的预后价值:一项前瞻性队列研究

Prognostic value of 24-hour cultivation of peritoneal fluid to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Mark-Christensen Anders, Bro Sørensen Ditte, Qvist Niels, Justesen Ulrik Stenz, Möller Sören, Ellebæk Mark Bremholm

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 8;409(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03428-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03428-3
PMID:39115580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The distinction between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA) is important as it guides postoperative antibiotic treatment. A diagnosis based on intraoperative findings is imprecise and standard cultivation of peritoneal fluid is generally time-consuming with little clinical benefit. The aim of this study was to examine if cultivation of peritoneal fluid in acute appendicitis could reliably detect bacteria within 24 h.

METHODS

Patients older than 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were prospectively enrolled at two surgical departments after informed consent was obtained. Periappendicular fluid was collected prior to appendectomy and sent for cultivation. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using 72-hour cultivation results as the gold standard. Patients with complicated AA as determined by the surgeon, received a three-day course of oral antibiotics. Postoperative infectious complications within 30 days after surgery were registered.

RESULTS

From July 2020 to January 2021, 101 patients were included. The intraoperative diagnosis was complicated AA in 34 cases. Of these patients, six (17.6%) had bacteria cultured within 24 h after surgery, leading to a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive values were 1.00 and 0.96, respectively. Seven patients developed a postoperative infection (five superficial wound infections and two intra-abdominal abscess). In all cases with a positive cultivation result, the intraoperative diagnosis was complicated appendicitis and a postoperative course of antibiotics prescribed.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-four-hour cultivation of the peritoneal fluid in acute appendicitis is a valid indicator for peritoneal bacterial contamination. Randomized studies are necessary to determine if this approach is suitable for targeting postoperative antibiotic treatment as a means to prevent overtreatment without increasing the risk of infectious complications.

摘要

背景

区分复杂性和非复杂性急性阑尾炎(AA)很重要,因为这会指导术后抗生素治疗。基于术中发现的诊断并不精确,而腹膜液的标准培养通常耗时且临床益处不大。本研究的目的是检验急性阑尾炎患者腹膜液培养能否在24小时内可靠地检测出细菌。

方法

在获得知情同意后,对两个外科科室中年龄超过18岁且接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者进行前瞻性纳入。在阑尾切除术前收集阑尾周围液体并送去培养。以72小时培养结果作为金标准,计算敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。由外科医生判定为复杂性AA的患者接受为期三天的口服抗生素疗程。记录术后30天内的感染性并发症。

结果

2020年7月至2021年1月,共纳入101例患者。术中诊断为复杂性AA的有34例。在这些患者中,6例(17.6%)术后24小时内培养出细菌,敏感性为60%,特异性为100%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为1.00和0.96。7例患者发生术后感染(5例浅表伤口感染和2例腹腔内脓肿)。在所有培养结果为阳性的病例中,术中诊断均为复杂性阑尾炎且术后开具了抗生素疗程。

结论

急性阑尾炎患者腹膜液的24小时培养是腹膜细菌污染的有效指标。需要进行随机研究来确定这种方法是否适合作为靶向术后抗生素治疗的手段,以防止过度治疗且不增加感染性并发症的风险。

相似文献

1
Prognostic value of 24-hour cultivation of peritoneal fluid to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.通过24小时腹腔液培养区分复杂性与非复杂性急性阑尾炎的预后价值:一项前瞻性队列研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 8;409(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03428-3.
2
Acute Appendicitis: A Weak Concordance Between Perioperative Diagnosis, Pathology and Peritoneal Fluid Cultivation.急性阑尾炎:围手术期诊断、病理及腹腔积液培养之间的一致性较差。
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):70-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3686-8.
3
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
4
Antibiotic Duration After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Complicated Appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性复杂性阑尾炎后的抗生素疗程。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):323-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4236.
5
Copious Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis in Adults.成人复杂性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术期间大量冲洗与单纯吸引的比较
J Invest Surg. 2018 Aug;31(4):342-346. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1319995. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.对于复杂性阑尾炎行开腹阑尾切除术后,行腹腔引流以预防腹腔内脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub3.
7
Peritoneal fluid culture and antibiotic treatment in patients with perforated appendicitis in a Pacific Island.太平洋岛屿上阑尾炎穿孔患者的腹腔液培养与抗生素治疗
Asian J Surg. 2015 Oct;38(4):242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
BioFire blood culture identification 2 panel as detector of bacteria in peritoneal fluid from patients with acute appendicitis.BioFire 血培养鉴定 2 面板作为急性阑尾炎患者腹腔液中细菌的检测手段。
Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):798-802. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.030. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy-does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system.REsiDENT 1(腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾炎评估的重新评估:我们是否结束了非标准化的治疗方法和习惯?):腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的腹腔灌洗-污染程度是否重要?一种新分类系统的基于住院医师的前瞻性多中心评估。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 30;14:25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0243-4. eCollection 2019.
10
Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的比较:APPAC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
2
Enteral Antibiotics are Non-inferior to Intravenous Antibiotics After Complicated Appendicitis in Adults: A Retrospective Multicentre Non-inferiority Study.成人复杂性阑尾炎后肠内抗生素不劣于静脉内抗生素:一项回顾性多中心非劣效性研究。
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2706-2714. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4076-6.
3
Acute Appendicitis: A Weak Concordance Between Perioperative Diagnosis, Pathology and Peritoneal Fluid Cultivation.
急性阑尾炎:围手术期诊断、病理及腹腔积液培养之间的一致性较差。
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):70-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3686-8.
4
Peritoneal fluid culture and antibiotic treatment in patients with perforated appendicitis in a Pacific Island.太平洋岛屿上阑尾炎穿孔患者的腹腔液培养与抗生素治疗
Asian J Surg. 2015 Oct;38(4):242-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 2.
5
Acute appendicitis: a disease severity score for the acute care surgeon.急性阑尾炎:急性外科医生用疾病严重程度评分。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):32-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318278934a.
6
Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: new insight for future trials.急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜分级系统:对未来试验的新见解
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Oct;22(5):463-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318262edf1.
7
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的比较:NSQIP 数据库回顾。
J Surg Res. 2010 Oct;163(2):225-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.071. Epub 2010 May 15.
8
Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.穿孔性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿
Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):438-41. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.438.
9
The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States.美国阑尾炎及阑尾切除术的流行病学
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.