• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穿孔性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿

Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

作者信息

Krisher S L, Browne A, Dibbins A, Tkacz N, Curci M

机构信息

Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):438-41. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.438.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.136.4.438
PMID:11296116
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess is higher after laparoscopic compared with open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

A historical cohort study of pediatric patients operated on for suspected appendicitis by open appendectomy or laparoscopic appendectomy compares the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess for each procedure.

SETTING

A tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Five hundred thirty-eight pediatric patients were operated on for suspected appendicitis at our institution between 1974 and 1999. Of these, 453 were included in the study. Of the excluded patients, 9 had incomplete medical records, 69 had normal or interval appendectomies, and 7 had appendixes removed by methods other than laparoscopy or right lower quadrant incision.

INTERVENTIONS

Open appendectomy performed through a right lower quadrant incision or laparoscopic appendectomy performed through a 3-trocar approach by 1 of 3 pediatric surgeons at our institution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic vs open appendectomy.

RESULTS

In perforated appendicitis (170 patients), the incidence of postoperative abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy was 24% vs 4.2% after open appendectomy. The relative risk ratio of developing a postoperative abscess after perforated appendicitis was 5.6 (confidence interval, 2.1-16.0) after laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. The results remained significant when controlled for age, sex, intraoperative irrigation, and preoperative antibiotics. Postoperative abscess in all acute, gangrenous, and perforated appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy was 6.4% vs 3.0% after open appendectomy. This was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant increase in the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess with perforated appendicitis after laparoscopic compared with open appendectomy in pediatric patients.

摘要

假设

对于穿孔性阑尾炎,与开腹阑尾切除术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的发生率更高。

方法

一项针对因疑似阑尾炎接受开腹阑尾切除术或腹腔镜阑尾切除术的儿科患者的历史性队列研究,比较了每种手术术后腹腔内脓肿的发生率。

地点

一家三级医疗中心。

患者

1974年至1999年间,我院538例因疑似阑尾炎接受手术的儿科患者。其中,453例纳入研究。排除的患者中,9例病历不完整,69例行正常或间隔期阑尾切除术,7例阑尾通过腹腔镜或右下腹切口以外的方法切除。

干预措施

由我院3名儿科外科医生之一通过右下腹切口进行开腹阑尾切除术,或通过三孔法进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。

主要观察指标

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的发生率。

结果

在穿孔性阑尾炎患者(170例)中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术后脓肿发生率为24%,开腹阑尾切除术后为4.2%。穿孔性阑尾炎术后发生脓肿的相对风险比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术相比为5.6(置信区间,2.1 - 16.0)。在对年龄、性别、术中冲洗和术前抗生素进行控制后,结果仍然显著。腹腔镜阑尾切除术后所有急性、坏疽性和穿孔性阑尾炎的术后脓肿发生率为6.4%,开腹阑尾切除术后为3.0%。这无统计学意义。

结论

在儿科患者中,与开腹阑尾切除术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术后穿孔性阑尾炎的腹腔内脓肿发生率显著增加。

相似文献

1
Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.穿孔性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿
Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):438-41. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.438.
2
Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;1(2):188-92; discussion 192-3. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80108-4.
3
Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开放性阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
Surg Endosc. 1996 Mar;10(3):327-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00187382.
4
The laparoscopic approach for perforated appendicitis, including cases complicated by abscess formation.腹腔镜治疗穿孔性阑尾炎,包括合并脓肿形成的病例。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Dec;19(6):727-30. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0196.
5
Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.穿孔性阑尾炎并非腹腔镜检查的禁忌证。
Am Surg. 1999 Oct;65(10):965-7.
6
Early surgery for perforated appendicitis: Are we moving the needle on postoperative abscess?穿孔性阑尾炎的早期手术:我们是否在改变术后脓肿的治疗方法?
Am J Surg. 2023 Aug;226(2):256-260. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 14.
7
Does use of intraoperative irrigation with open or laparoscopic appendectomy reduce post-operative intra-abdominal abscess?开腹或腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用术中冲洗是否能减少术后腹腔内脓肿的发生?
Am Surg. 2011 Jan;77(1):78-80.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
9
Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate?穿孔性阑尾炎:早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):731-7; discussion 737-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.053.
10
Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿发生率
Am J Surg. 2000 Dec;180(6):456-9; discussion 460-1. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00504-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of 24-hour cultivation of peritoneal fluid to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.通过24小时腹腔液培养区分复杂性与非复杂性急性阑尾炎的预后价值:一项前瞻性队列研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 8;409(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03428-3.
2
Surgical and Pre-surgical Factors Affecting Appendectomy Outcomes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Record Review.沙特阿拉伯吉达影响阑尾切除术结果的手术及术前因素:一项回顾性记录审查
Cureus. 2024 Jun 23;16(6):e62960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62960. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Intra-Abdominal Abscess Risk Post-Appendectomy.
使用人工神经网络预测阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿风险
Ann Surg Open. 2022 May 23;3(2):e168. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000168. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy: Effectiveness in children with generalized and advanced generalized peritonitis cases.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:对患有弥漫性和晚期弥漫性腹膜炎的儿童的有效性。
Turk J Surg. 2023 Mar 3;39(1):52-56. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5707. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Factors Influencing the Difficulty and Need for External Help during Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Analysis of 485 Procedures from the Resident-1 Multicentre Trial.腹腔镜阑尾切除术时影响手术难度及是否需要外部协助的因素:来自住院医师-1多中心试验的485例手术分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):1904. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111904.
6
Energy Devices for Clipless-Sutureless Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Utility and Safety.无夹闭免打结腹腔镜阑尾切除术的能量设备:有效性和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 27;58(11):1535. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111535.
7
Differences in isolated bacteria between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis: an analysis of 680 consecutive appendicectomies in a single institution.穿孔性与非穿孔性阑尾炎之间分离细菌的差异:单一机构 680 例连续阑尾切除术的分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Dec;38(12):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05236-6. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Triple Drain Placement in Treatment of Perforated Hollow Viscus During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Rural Facility.农村医疗机构在新冠疫情期间采用三腔引流治疗穿孔性中空脏器疾病
Am Surg. 2023 Jun;89(6):2888-2889. doi: 10.1177/00031348221074230. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy with extracorporeal hand-sewn stump closure in adult patients.成人经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术联合体外手工缝合残端闭合术
Fujita Med J. 2021;7(4):111-116. doi: 10.20407/fmj.2020-009. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
10
Aspiration versus peritoneal lavage in appendicitis: a meta-analysis.阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎:一种荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Sep 6;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00391-y.