Phase-resolved MRI for measurement of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation defects in comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and Xe MRI.

INTRODUCTION

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the agreement and correlation between phase-resolved functional lung MRI (PREFUL MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in evaluating perfusion defect percentage (QDP), as well as the agreement between PREFUL MRI and Xe MRI in assessing ventilation defect percentage (VDP).

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies comparing QDP and VDP measured by DCE MRI and Xe MRI compared with PREFUL MRI. Meta-analytical techniques were applied to calculate the pooled weighted bias, limits of agreement (LOA) and correlation coefficient. The publication bias was assessed using Egger's regression test, while heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and Higgins I statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 399 subjects from 10 studies were enrolled. The mean difference and LOA were -2.31% (-8.01% to 3.40%) for QDP and 0.34% (-4.94% to 5.62%) for VDP. The pooled correlations (95% CI) were 0.65 (0.55 to 0.73) for QDP and 0.72 (0.61 to 0.80) for VDP. Furthermore, both QDP and VDP showed a negative correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV). The pooled correlation between QDP and FEV was -0.51 (-0.74 to -0.18), as well as between VDP and FEV was -0.60 (-0.73 to -0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

PREFUL MRI is a promising imaging for the assessment of lung function, as it demonstrates satisfactory deviations and LOA when compared with DEC MRI and Xe MRI.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023430847.