• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《医生对患者信任量表》(PTPS)的波兰语改编、心理测量特性及验证

Polish adaptation, psychometric properties and validation of Physician's Trust in the Patient Scale (PTPS).

作者信息

Błaszyk Marta A, Kroemeke Aleksandra

机构信息

Department of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Medical Simulation Centre, Wroclaw Medical University, Chalubinskiego 7A, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 8;14(1):18457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69351-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-69351-1
PMID:39117849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11310218/
Abstract

Mutual trust is considered one of the critical aspects of building a successful doctor-patient relationship. Albeit patient trust in physicians has been widely explored by researchers, physician trust in patients remains neglected, which is reflected by the lack of existing tools to assess this construct. Therefore, we aimed to validate and adapt Thom's Physician's Trust in the Patient Scale (PTPS) in Polish. We conducted a survey-based study among 307 medical doctors. To determine the factor structure of the scale, both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. The two-factor solution was established for the scale in accordance with the original version. To determine the internal reliability and consistency of the scale, we measured Cronbach's alpha, corrected-item total correlation, and discrimination indices-all of them obtained very good or excellent values. Estimates of convergent and discriminant validity reached all suggested thresholds. The scale also performed well in theoretical validity. Together, these findings suggest that the psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation and validation of PTPS are satisfactory and that the tool can find practical and scientific applications. We believe that the scale can substantially add to our understanding of building trust-based relationships and rapport between patients and physicians.

摘要

相互信任被认为是建立成功医患关系的关键因素之一。尽管研究人员对患者对医生的信任进行了广泛探讨,但医生对患者的信任仍被忽视,这体现在缺乏评估这一概念的现有工具上。因此,我们旨在对汤姆的《医生对患者信任量表》(PTPS)进行波兰语的验证和改编。我们对307名医生进行了一项基于调查的研究。为了确定量表的因素结构,我们进行了探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。根据原始版本,该量表确定了双因素解决方案。为了确定量表的内部信度和一致性,我们测量了克朗巴哈系数、校正项与总分相关性以及区分指数——所有这些指标都获得了非常好或优秀的值。收敛效度和区分效度的估计达到了所有建议的阈值。该量表在理论效度方面也表现良好。总之,这些发现表明,波兰语版PTPS的改编和验证的心理测量特性是令人满意的,该工具可以找到实际和科学应用。我们相信,该量表可以极大地增进我们对建立患者与医生之间基于信任的关系和融洽关系的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/11310218/f039da11f2b4/41598_2024_69351_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/11310218/89a3bc029559/41598_2024_69351_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/11310218/f039da11f2b4/41598_2024_69351_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/11310218/89a3bc029559/41598_2024_69351_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/11310218/f039da11f2b4/41598_2024_69351_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Polish adaptation, psychometric properties and validation of Physician's Trust in the Patient Scale (PTPS).《医生对患者信任量表》(PTPS)的波兰语改编、心理测量特性及验证
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 8;14(1):18457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69351-1.
2
Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Polish adaptation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale.华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表波兰语版的因子结构及心理测量特性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 2;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01716-w.
3
Turkish version of the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration: a preliminary study.《杰斐逊医生与护士合作态度量表》土耳其语版本:一项初步研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2006 Oct;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.5172/conu.2006.23.1.38.
4
Trust in Physician Scale: factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates of trust in a sample of Nigerian psychiatric outpatients.信任医师量表:在尼日利亚精神科门诊患者样本中的结构因素、信度、效度和信任相关因素。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
A Multidimensional Questionnaire to Measure Career Satisfaction of Physicians: Validation of the Polish Version of the 4CornerSAT.多维度医师职业满意度问卷:4CornerSAT 波兰文版的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031033.
6
Psychometric properties of the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM) in the Polish population.波兰人群中应激心态量表(SMM)的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 22;17(3):e0264853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264853. eCollection 2022.
7
Development and validation of a socioculturally competent trust in physician scale for a developing country setting.针对发展中国家环境开发并验证一种具有社会文化适应性的医患信任量表。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 3;5(4):e007305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007305.
8
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Validation of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale for Vulnerable Communities in Vietnam's Coastal Regions.越南沿海地区脆弱社区适应和恢复力量表的验证。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 May;57(3):279-287. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.110. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.医生信任量表的进一步验证与信度测试。斯坦福信任研究医生团队。
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):510-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00010.

本文引用的文献

1
Fifty Years of Trust Research in Health Care: A Synthetic Review.五十年来医疗保健领域信任研究综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):126-178. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12598. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Trust Takes Two….信任需要双方共同努力……
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Dec 23;35(6):1179-1182. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220126R1. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Explicating the Cognitive Process of a Physician's Trust in Patients: A Moderated Mediation Model.阐释医师对患者信任的认知过程:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114446.
4
Development and validation of an end stage kidney disease awareness survey: Item difficulty and discrimination indices.终末期肾病认知调查的制定和验证:项目难度和区分度指数。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0269488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269488. eCollection 2022.
5
Trust, medical expertise and humaneness: A qualitative study on people with cancer' satisfaction with medical care.信任、医学专业知识和人道精神:一项关于癌症患者对医疗服务满意度的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):317-326. doi: 10.1111/hex.13171. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Transparency as a Trust-Building Practice in Physician Relationships With Patients.透明度作为医生与患者关系中建立信任的一种实践。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 15;324(23):2365-2366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.18368.
7
Trust in Health Care in the Time of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期对医疗保健的信任。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 15;324(23):2373-2375. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23343.
8
Relational continuity and patients' perception of GP trust and respect: a qualitative study.关系连续性与患者对全科医生信任和尊重的感知:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e676-e683. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712349. Print 2020 Sep.
9
Physician-patient interaction and medication adherence in lupus nephritis.医患互动与狼疮性肾炎患者的药物依从性。
Lupus. 2020 Sep;29(10):1168-1178. doi: 10.1177/0961203320935977. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
10
The patient-physician relationship: an account of the physician's perspective.医患关系:从医生角度的描述。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Jun 30;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00375-4.