Konaszewski Karol, Niesiobędzka Małgorzata, Surzykiewicz Janusz
Faculty of Education, University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Philosophy and Education, Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 2;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01716-w.
The study of mental wellbeing requires reliable, valid, and practical measurement tools. One of the most widely used measures of mental wellbeing is the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). We conducted four studies to validate the Polish version of the WEMWBS. Their objectives are the following: (1) to present the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the WEMWBS (study 1: n = 1197); (2) to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the Polish version of the WEMWBS (study 2: n = 24); (3) to determine the validity of the WEMWBS (study 3: n = 610); (4) to examine sensitivity of the WEMWBS scale to detect population with different levels of pro-health behaviours (study 4: n = 430).
To explore the dimensional structure of the scale we tested a one-factor model. The evaluation employed explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses and tested reliability and stability. To determine the convergent validity of the WEMWBS we analysed correlations among wellbeing and life satisfaction and risk depression. To examine sensitivity of the WEMWBS scale to detect a population with different levels of health-related behaviours we used Student's t test.
The results presented confirm that the psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of WEMWBS are very good. Using EFA and CFA it was shown that a one-factor solution is optimal. Reliability, measured using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald's omega proved to be very high. The estimation of the stability of the Polish version of the WEMWBS proved to be high. Our validation studies also provided data demonstrating sensitivity of the WEMWBS to detect a population with different levels of health-related behaviours, indicating that group with high level of pro-health behaviours achieved higher WEMWBS wellbeing results than group with low level of pro-health behaviours.
WEMWBS was confirmed as a short, reliable and valid measure with good psychometric properties. Due to the high indicators for its psychometric properties, the scale may therefore prove to be a particularly useful tool not only in empirical research, but also in mental wellbeing monitoring, and could serve as support in educational and preventive.
心理健康研究需要可靠、有效且实用的测量工具。心理健康最广泛使用的测量方法之一是沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)。我们进行了四项研究来验证WEMWBS的波兰语版本。其目标如下:(1)呈现WEMWBS波兰语版本的心理测量特性(研究1:n = 1197);(2)评估WEMWBS波兰语版本的重测信度(研究2:n = 24);(3)确定WEMWBS的效度(研究3:n = 610);(4)检验WEMWBS量表检测不同水平促进健康行为人群的敏感性(研究4:n = 430)。
为探索该量表的维度结构,我们测试了单因素模型。评估采用解释性和验证性因素分析,并测试信度和稳定性。为确定WEMWBS的收敛效度,我们分析了幸福感、生活满意度与抑郁风险之间的相关性。为检验WEMWBS量表检测不同水平健康相关行为人群的敏感性,我们使用了学生t检验。
呈现的结果证实,WEMWBS波兰语改编版的心理测量特性非常好。使用探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)表明单因素解决方案是最优的。使用克朗巴哈α系数和麦克唐纳ω系数测量的信度非常高。WEMWBS波兰语版本稳定性的估计结果很高。我们的验证研究还提供数据表明WEMWBS对检测不同水平健康相关行为人群具有敏感性,表明促进健康行为水平高的组比促进健康行为水平低的组获得更高的WEMWBS幸福感结果。
WEMWBS被确认为一种简短、可靠且有效的测量方法,具有良好的心理测量特性。由于其心理测量特性的高指标,该量表因此可能被证明是一种特别有用的工具,不仅在实证研究中,而且在心理健康监测中,并可在教育和预防方面提供支持。