• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防有犯罪记录的青少年在向成年期过渡期间使用阿片类药物:利用安全成年人(LeSA)。

Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA).

机构信息

Texas Christian University, 2901 University Drive, TCU Box 298921, Fort Worth, TX 76129, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):2133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12127-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-12127-3
PMID:34801009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8605598/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Juvenile justice (JJ) youth are at high risk of opioid and other substance use (SU), dysfunctional family/social relationships, and complex trauma. The purpose of the Leveraging Safe Adults (LeSA) Project is to examine the effectiveness of Trust-Based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®; leveraging family systems by providing emotional and instrumental guidance, support, and role modeling) in preventing opioid and other SU among youth after release from secure residential facilities.

METHODS

An effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Type 1 design is used to test the effectiveness of TBRI for preventing non-medical use of opioids among JJ-youth (delayed-start at the site level; a randomized controlled trial at participant level) and to gain insight into facility-level barriers to TBRI implementation as part of JJ re-entry protocols. Recruitment includes two samples (effectiveness: 360 youth/caregiver dyads; implementation: 203 JJ staff) from nine sites in two states over 3 years. Participant eligibility includes 15 to 18-year-olds disposed to community supervision and receiving care in a secure JJ facility, without active suicide risk, and with one caregiver willing to participate. Effectiveness data come from (1) youth and caregiver self-report on background, SU, psychosocial functioning, and youth-caregiver relationships (Months 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18), youth monthly post-release check-ins, and caregiver report on youth psychological/behavioral symptoms, and (2) JJ facility records (e.g., recidivism, treatment utilization). Fidelity assessment includes post-session checklists and measures of TBRI strategy use. Collected four times over four years, implementation data include (1) JJ staff self-report on facility and staff characteristics, use of trauma-informed care and TBRI strategies, and (2) focus groups (line staff, leadership separately) on use of trauma-informed strategies, uptake of new interventions, and penetration, sustainment, and expansion of TBRI practices.

DISCUSSION

The LeSA study is testing TBRI as a means to empower caregivers to help prevent opioid use and other SU among JJ-youth. TBRI's multiple components offer an opportunity for caregivers to supplement and extend gains during residential care. If effective and implemented successfully, the LeSA protocol will help expand the application of TBRI with a wider audience and provide guidance for implementing multi-component interventions in complex systems spanning multiple contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04678960 ; registered November 11, 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04678960 .

摘要

背景

青少年司法(JJ)青少年有很高的阿片类药物和其他物质使用(SU)、功能失调的家庭/社会关系和复杂创伤的风险。Leveraging Safe Adults (LeSA) 项目的目的是研究基于信任的关系干预®(TBRI®;通过提供情感和工具指导、支持和角色扮演,利用家庭系统)在从安全住宿设施释放后预防青少年滥用阿片类药物和其他物质的有效性。

方法

使用有效性-实施混合 1 型设计来测试 TBRI 预防 JJ 青少年非医疗使用阿片类药物的有效性(现场水平延迟启动;参与者水平的随机对照试验),并深入了解设施层面实施 TBRI 的障碍作为 JJ 重新进入协议的一部分。招募包括在两个州的九个地点的 360 名青少年/照顾者对和 203 名 JJ 工作人员,为期 3 年。参与者的资格包括 15 至 18 岁,被安置在社区监督下,在安全的 JJ 设施中接受护理,没有活跃的自杀风险,并且有一名愿意参与的照顾者。有效性数据来自(1)青少年和照顾者自我报告的背景、SU、心理社会功能和青少年-照顾者关系(0 个月、3 个月、6 个月、12 个月和 18 个月)、青少年每月发布后检查和照顾者报告的青少年心理/行为症状,以及(2)JJ 设施记录(例如,累犯、治疗利用情况)。保真度评估包括会议后检查表和 TBRI 策略使用的衡量标准。四年来收集了四次,实施数据包括(1)JJ 工作人员自我报告的设施和工作人员特征、创伤知情护理和 TBRI 策略的使用情况,以及(2)关于使用创伤知情策略、新干预措施的采用以及 TBRI 实践的渗透、维持和扩展的焦点小组(一线工作人员、领导层分别)。

讨论

LeSA 研究正在测试 TBRI 作为一种使照顾者有能力帮助预防 JJ 青少年使用阿片类药物和其他物质的方法。TBRI 的多个组成部分为照顾者提供了一个机会,以补充和扩展他们在住宿期间的收益。如果有效并成功实施,LeSA 方案将有助于将 TBRI 应用于更广泛的受众,并为在跨越多个环境的复杂系统中实施多组件干预措施提供指导。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04678960;2020 年 11 月 11 日注册;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04678960。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/62a8edcdbd75/12889_2021_12127_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/1871761603d0/12889_2021_12127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/dca0f78ea9bd/12889_2021_12127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/62a8edcdbd75/12889_2021_12127_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/1871761603d0/12889_2021_12127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/dca0f78ea9bd/12889_2021_12127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e4/8605598/62a8edcdbd75/12889_2021_12127_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA).预防有犯罪记录的青少年在向成年期过渡期间使用阿片类药物:利用安全成年人(LeSA)。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):2133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12127-3.
2
Adaptation of a trauma-informed intervention to prevent opioid use among youth in the legal system.将创伤知情干预措施改编用于预防法律体系内青少年使用阿片类药物。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug;163:209294. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209294. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Adaptation of a trauma-informed intervention for youth involved in the legal system.为涉及法律系统的青少年调整创伤知情干预措施。
Res Sq. 2023 Mar 1:rs.3.rs-2596631. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2596631/v1.
4
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Trauma-informed Intervention to Leverage Caregivers in Preventing Opioid Use Among Youth Involved in the Legal System.一项以创伤为导向的干预措施在利用照顾者预防涉及法律系统的青少年使用阿片类药物方面的可行性和可接受性。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Apr 6;17(3):925-938. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00636-3. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Start-Up and Implementation Costs for the Trust Based Relational Intervention.信任关系干预启动和实施成本。
J Prev (2022). 2024 Dec;45(6):847-860. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00803-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
6
Prevention of Opioid Use and Disorder Among Youth Involved in the Legal System: Innovation and Implementation of Four Studies Funded by the NIDA HEAL Initiative.预防参与司法系统的青少年阿片类药物使用和障碍:NIDA HEAL 计划资助的四项研究的创新和实施。
Prev Sci. 2023 Oct;24(Suppl 1):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01566-6. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
7
The comparative effectiveness of Core versus Core+Enhanced implementation strategies in a randomized controlled trial to improve substance use treatment receipt among justice-involved youth.在一项随机对照试验中,比较核心策略与核心+强化策略对改善有犯罪经历的青少年接受药物使用治疗的效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):1535. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08902-6.
8
Text Messaging to Enhance Behavioral Health Treatment Engagement Among Justice-Involved Youth: Qualitative and User Testing Study.短信干预提升涉法青少年行为健康治疗参与度:定性与用户测试研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 5;7(4):e10904. doi: 10.2196/10904.
9
Conditions of successful treatment referral practices with justice-involved youth: Qualitative insights from probation and service provider staff involved in JJ-TRIALS.成功治疗转介实践的条件:参与 JJ-TRIALS 的缓刑和服务提供者工作人员的定性见解。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209358. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209358. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
10
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Trauma-informed Intervention to Leverage Caregivers in Preventing Opioid Use Among Youth Involved in the Legal System.一项以创伤为导向的干预措施在利用照顾者预防涉及法律系统的青少年使用阿片类药物方面的可行性和可接受性。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Apr 6;17(3):925-938. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00636-3. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Start-Up and Implementation Costs for the Trust Based Relational Intervention.信任关系干预启动和实施成本。
J Prev (2022). 2024 Dec;45(6):847-860. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00803-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
3
Tailoring opioid use prevention content for juvenile diversion programs with adolescents and their caregivers.

本文引用的文献

1
Justice community opioid innovation network (JCOIN): The TCU research hub.司法社区阿片类药物创新网络(JCOIN):TCU 研究中心。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Sep;128:108290. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108290. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
The Relationship Between Trauma, Recidivism Risk, and Reoffending in Male and Female Juvenile Offenders.男性和女性青少年罪犯的创伤、再犯风险与再次犯罪之间的关系。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2018 Nov 27;12(3):351-364. doi: 10.1007/s40653-018-0238-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Juvenile justice systems of care: results of a national survey of community supervision agencies and behavioral health providers on services provision and cross-system interactions.
为青少年转处项目中的青少年及其照顾者量身定制阿片类药物使用预防内容。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Oct;165:209470. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209470. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Relationship-Oriented Recovery System for Youth (RORSY): Clinical Protocol for Transition-Age Youth with Opioid Use Disorders.青少年关系导向康复系统(RORSY):针对患有阿片类物质使用障碍的过渡年龄青少年的临床方案。
HSOA J Addict Addict Disord. 2023;10(3). doi: 10.24966/aad-7276/100144. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Including Community Partners in the Development and Adaptation of Intervention Strategies to Prevent Initiation or Escalation of Opioid Misuse.将社区合作伙伴纳入干预策略的制定和调整,以预防阿片类药物滥用的开始或升级。
Prev Sci. 2023 Oct;24(Suppl 1):61-76. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01575-5. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Prevention of Opioid Use and Disorder Among Youth Involved in the Legal System: Innovation and Implementation of Four Studies Funded by the NIDA HEAL Initiative.预防参与司法系统的青少年阿片类药物使用和障碍:NIDA HEAL 计划资助的四项研究的创新和实施。
Prev Sci. 2023 Oct;24(Suppl 1):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01566-6. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
7
Multidisciplinary Strategies for Preventing Opioid Misuse and Escalation by Targeting Mental Health Symptoms and Conditions.多学科策略预防阿片类药物滥用和升级,针对心理健康症状和状况。
Prev Sci. 2023 Oct;24(Suppl 1):77-87. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01556-8. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
8
Substance use severity as a predictor for receiving medication for opioid use disorder among adolescents: An analysis of the 2019 TEDS.物质使用严重程度作为预测青少年阿片类药物使用障碍接受药物治疗的指标:对 2019 年 TEDS 的分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 May 1;246:109850. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109850. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
青少年司法照护系统:一项针对社区监管机构和行为健康服务提供者关于服务提供及跨系统互动的全国性调查结果
Health Justice. 2019 Jun 14;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40352-019-0093-x.
4
Internalizing and externalizing factors on the pathway from adverse experiences in childhood to non-medical prescription opioid use in adulthood.儿童时期不良经历与成年后非医疗处方类阿片类药物使用之间关系的内化和外化因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1;197:212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.029. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Cost of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorders following inpatient detoxification.阿片类物质使用障碍患者住院戒毒后的药物治疗成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov;24(11):526-531.
6
Changes in Synthetic Opioid Involvement in Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 2010-2016.2010-2016 年美国药物过量死亡中合成阿片类药物使用的变化。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1819-1821. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2844.
7
Past-year nonmedical use of prescription drugs among women on probation and parole: A cross-sectional study.在缓刑和假释妇女中,过去一年处方药的非医疗使用:一项横断面研究。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):280-285. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1442382. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Cost-effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.基于互联网的围手术期护理方案对促进妇科患者术后恢复的成本效益:一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验的经济学评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e017782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017782.
9
Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and substance use among young adults: A latent class analysis.不良童年经历模式与青年期物质使用的关系:潜类别分析。
Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;78:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
The relationship between family-based adverse childhood experiences and substance use behaviors among a diverse sample of college students.基于家庭的不良儿童经历与不同样本大学生物质使用行为之间的关系。
Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Sep 1.