• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验工作需求-资源模型以解释私营监狱工作人员之间的组织信任。

Testing the job demands - resources model to explain organizational trust among private prison staff.

作者信息

Hogan Nancy L, Lambert Eric G, Lanterman Jennifer L, Berthelot Emily

机构信息

School of Criminal Justice, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, MI, USA.

Department of Criminal Justice, The University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Jul 2;31(4):705-724. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206875. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2023.2206875
PMID:39118780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11305049/
Abstract

Two major forms of organizational trust are supervisor trust and management trust. Guided by the job demand-resources model, this exploratory study examined how the job demand variables of role conflict, role ambiguity, role overload, and fear of being victimized at work and the job resource variables of instrumental communication, job autonomy, job variety, and quality training were linked to both forms of organizational trust among staff at a private U.S. prison. Results showed that workplace variables predicted both types of trust and were generally stronger predictors than personal attributes. Moreover, resources played a greater role than job demands in shaping both supervisor and management trust. Among the demands, only role conflict was a significant negative predictor of supervisor trust and management trust. Instrumental communication, job autonomy, and job variety were significant positive predictors of supervisor trust. Job autonomy and job variety both had significant positive associations with management trust.

摘要

组织信任的两种主要形式是对上级的信任和对管理层的信任。在工作需求-资源模型的指导下,这项探索性研究考察了角色冲突、角色模糊、角色过载和工作中受侵害恐惧等工作需求变量,以及工具性沟通、工作自主性、工作多样性和质量培训等工作资源变量,是如何与美国一所私立监狱工作人员的这两种组织信任形式相关联的。结果表明,工作场所变量能够预测这两种信任类型,并且通常比个人属性更能预测信任。此外,在塑造对上级的信任和对管理层的信任方面,资源比工作需求发挥的作用更大。在工作需求中,只有角色冲突是对上级信任和对管理层信任的显著负向预测因素。工具性沟通、工作自主性和工作多样性是对上级信任的显著正向预测因素。工作自主性和工作多样性都与对管理层的信任存在显著的正相关。

相似文献

1
Testing the job demands - resources model to explain organizational trust among private prison staff.检验工作需求-资源模型以解释私营监狱工作人员之间的组织信任。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Jul 2;31(4):705-724. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206875. eCollection 2024.
2
A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff.澳大利亚大学教职工程序公正感预测因素的纵向研究
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 25;7:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271. eCollection 2016.
3
An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Work Environment Variables on Job Satisfaction Among Chinese Prison Staff.工作环境变量对中国监狱工作人员工作满意度影响的探索性研究
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 May;62(6):1694-1719. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17691533. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Well-being, satisfaction and commitment: the substitutable nature of resources for maternity hospital nurses.幸福感、满意度和承诺:妇产科护士资源的可替代性。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Oct;69(10):2218-28. doi: 10.1111/jan.12096. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Examining supervisor undermining through the job-demands resources framework.审视工作要求资源框架下的监督者破坏行为。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 Nov;35(4):206-214. doi: 10.1177/09514848211048608. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
6
Examining the association between work-family conflict and the work attitudes of job satisfaction and organizational commitment among Chinese correctional staff.考察中国惩教人员工作-家庭冲突与工作满意度和组织承诺等工作态度之间的关联。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Mar 19;27(4):558-577. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734980. eCollection 2020.
7
The Association of Organizational Justice with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment among Nigerian Correctional Staff.尼日利亚惩教人员组织公正感与工作满意度和组织承诺的关系。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Feb;65(2-3):180-204. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20946926. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
When Does Work Interfere With Teachers' Private Life? An Application of the Job Demands-Resources Model.工作何时会干扰教师的私人生活?工作要求-资源模型的应用。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 21;10:1121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01121. eCollection 2019.
9
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
Are They Created Equal? A Relative Weights Analysis of the Contributions of Job Demands and Resources to Well-Being and Turnover Intention.他们生来平等吗?工作要求和资源对幸福感和离职意向的相对贡献的相对权重分析。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Feb;127(1):392-418. doi: 10.1177/00332941221103536. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance.信任、可信赖性与信任倾向:对它们与冒险行为和工作绩效独特关系的元分析检验
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):909-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909.
2
Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout.工作资源缓冲了工作要求对倦怠的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2005 Apr;10(2):170-80. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170.
3
Trust in management as a buffer of the relationships between overload and strain.信任管理层可作为工作负荷与压力之间关系的缓冲因素。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2003 Oct;8(4):306-15. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.306.
4
The job demands-resources model of burnout.职业倦怠的工作要求-资源模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512.