• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎间盘的T2映射:与Pfirrmann分级系统相关的退变定量评估及椎间盘分割模板

T2 mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc: quantitative evaluation of degeneration in relation to Pfirrmann grading system and a template for intervertebral disc segmentation.

作者信息

Stefanou D E, Velonakis G, Karavasilis E, Argyropoulos G, Kelekis A, Kelekis N, Filippiadis D

机构信息

2 Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens.

出版信息

Hippokratia. 2023 Jul-Sep;27(3):75-81.

PMID:39119364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11305159/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility of using T2 relaxation time mapping at 3 Tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection and classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration, introducing an objective model of disc segmentation for accurate disc assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study is a single-center prospective evaluation including 185 lumbar intervertebral discs from a cohort of 37 patients with chronic lower back pain. For the quantitative classification of disc degeneration, three regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on T2 maps, and the Pfirrmann grading system was used for qualitative assessment. Intergroup evaluation was performed with paired t-tests. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean value of T2 mapping, and Tukey's multiple comparison test was applied to determine differences in mean values of T2 mapping among the Pfirrmann categories.

RESULTS

The ANOVA test analysis of ROIs showed that there is a statistically significant difference (p <0.001) among average T2 relaxation time mapping values in different Pfirrmann score groups, and Tukey's multiple comparison tests revealed that mean values of T2 map among the different grades of Pfirrmann differ from the rest (p <0.001) except grade V. Paired t-tests revealed significant differences in mean values of T2 map between different ROIs.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that quantitative T2 mapping of the lumbar intervertebral discs at 3T MRI may overcome the subjective element of qualitative classification systems for degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Also, a new template of disc segmentation with more ROIs would be more sensitive for the assessment of disc degeneration. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (2):75-81.

摘要

背景

评估在3特斯拉(3T)磁共振成像(MRI)中使用T2弛豫时间映射检测和分类腰椎间盘退变的可行性,引入一种用于准确椎间盘评估的客观椎间盘分割模型。

材料与方法

本研究为单中心前瞻性评估,纳入了37例慢性下腰痛患者队列中的185个腰椎间盘。为了对椎间盘退变进行定量分类,在T2图上绘制了三个感兴趣区域(ROI),并使用Pfirrmann分级系统进行定性评估。采用配对t检验进行组间评估。使用方差分析(ANOVA)比较T2映射的平均值,并应用Tukey多重比较检验确定Pfirrmann类别之间T2映射平均值的差异。

结果

对ROI的ANOVA检验分析表明,不同Pfirrmann评分组的平均T2弛豫时间映射值之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001),Tukey多重比较检验显示,除V级外,不同Pfirrmann等级的T2图平均值与其他等级存在差异(p<0.001)。配对t检验显示不同ROI之间T2图平均值存在显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,3T MRI对腰椎间盘进行定量T2映射可能克服了椎间盘退变定性分类系统的主观因素。此外,具有更多ROI的新型椎间盘分割模板对椎间盘退变的评估可能更敏感。《希波克拉底》2023年,27(2):75 - 81。

相似文献

1
T2 mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc: quantitative evaluation of degeneration in relation to Pfirrmann grading system and a template for intervertebral disc segmentation.腰椎间盘的T2映射:与Pfirrmann分级系统相关的退变定量评估及椎间盘分割模板
Hippokratia. 2023 Jul-Sep;27(3):75-81.
2
Quantitative T2 evaluation at 3.0T compared to morphological grading of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a standardized evaluation approach in patients with low back pain.3.0T 下定量 T2 评估与腰椎间盘形态学分级的比较:腰痛患者的标准化评估方法。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.093. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
3
Ultrashort time-to-echo T2* and T2* relaxometry for evaluation of lumbar disc degeneration: a comparative study.用于评估腰椎间盘退变的超短回波时间T2*及T2*弛豫测量法:一项对比研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 1;23(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05481-9.
4
Quantitative synthetic MRI for evaluation of the lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration in patients with chronic low back pain.定量磁共振成像在慢性下腰痛患者腰椎间盘退变评估中的应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Mar;124:108858. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108858. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Variable flip angle T1 mapping and multi-echo T2 and T2* mapping magnetic resonance imaging sequences allow quantitative assessment of canine lumbar disc degeneration.可变翻转角 T1 映射和多回波 T2 和 T2* 映射磁共振成像序列可定量评估犬腰椎间盘退变。
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2023 Sep;64(5):864-872. doi: 10.1111/vru.13288. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Significant Association between the T2 Values of Vertebral Cartilage Endplates and Pfirrmann Grading.椎体软骨终板 T2 值与 Pfirrmann 分级之间存在显著相关性。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1164-1172. doi: 10.1111/os.12727. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
7
Glycosaminoglycan Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs in Healthy Volunteers.健康志愿者腰椎间盘的糖胺聚糖化学交换饱和转移
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):146-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001144.
8
T1ρ, T2 and T2* mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a comparison study.腰椎间盘退变的 T1ρ、T2 和 T2* 图谱:一项对比研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 27;23(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06040-y.
9
Feasibility study for evaluating lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration using histogram analysis of T2* values.使用 T2* 值直方图分析评估腰椎间盘退变的可行性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Oct;29(10):2600-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06476-7. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
T2 relaxation time for intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with upper back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI.上背部疼痛患者椎间盘退变的T2弛豫时间:3.0特斯拉磁共振成像临床应用的初步结果
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0182-z.

引用本文的文献

1
T2 mapping and q-Dixon for assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration in lower back pain.用于评估下腰痛患者椎间盘退变的T2映射和定量迪克森技术
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 11;26(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08453-x.

本文引用的文献

1
T1ρ, T2 and T2* mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a comparison study.腰椎间盘退变的 T1ρ、T2 和 T2* 图谱:一项对比研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 27;23(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06040-y.
2
Ultrashort time-to-echo T2* and T2* relaxometry for evaluation of lumbar disc degeneration: a comparative study.用于评估腰椎间盘退变的超短回波时间T2*及T2*弛豫测量法:一项对比研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 1;23(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05481-9.
3
Treatment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.椎间盘退变的治疗。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1271-1280. doi: 10.1111/os.13254. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
4
Imaging Evaluation of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration and Painful Discs-Advances and Challenges in Quantitative MRI.椎间盘退变与疼痛性椎间盘的影像学评估——定量MRI的进展与挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;12(3):707. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030707.
5
Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tools for the Diagnosis of Degenerative Disc Disease: A Narrative Review.用于诊断椎间盘退变疾病的新型磁共振成像工具:一篇叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;12(2):420. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020420.
6
Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.1990年至2017年全球腰痛患病率及伤残调整生命年:来自《2017年全球疾病负担研究》的估计
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
7
Imaging diagnosis for intervertebral disc.椎间盘的影像学诊断
JOR Spine. 2019 Sep 29;3(1):e1066. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1066. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1: Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Intervertebral Discogenic Pain and Radiofrequency Ablation of Basivertebral and Sinuvertebral Nerve Treatment for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: A Prospective Case Series and Review of Literature.腰椎退行性疾病第 1 部分:椎间盘源性疼痛的解剖学和病理生理学以及治疗慢性椎间盘源性腰痛的椎基底神经和窦神经射频消融:一项前瞻性病例系列研究和文献回顾。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 21;21(4):1483. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041483.
9
A comprehensive review of the sinuvertebral nerve with clinical applications.关于窦椎神经及其临床应用的综合综述。
Anat Cell Biol. 2019 Jun;52(2):128-133. doi: 10.5115/acb.2019.52.2.128. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
10
Discogenic Back Pain: Literature Review of Definition, Diagnosis, and Treatment.椎间盘源性腰痛:定义、诊断及治疗的文献综述
JBMR Plus. 2019 Mar 4;3(5):e10180. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10180. eCollection 2019 May.