Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences University of L'Aquila Italy.
Stroke Unit Maurizio Bufalini Hospital Cesena Italy.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e036275. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036275. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS.
This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; =0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; =0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; <0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both <0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; =0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes.
According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.
急性小缺血性卒中的最佳治疗方法仍未确定。治疗方案包括双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)、静脉溶栓(IVT)或两者联合。我们旨在研究 IVT 和 DAPT 联合与 DAPT 单药治疗在 MIS 患者中的获益和风险。
这是一项来自前瞻性多中心真实世界研究(READAPT [缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者短期双联抗血小板治疗的真实生活研究])的预先设定倾向评分匹配分析。我们纳入了 MIS 患者(入院时国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≤5),且无卒中前残疾(改良 Rankin 量表评分[ mRS ]≤2)。主要结局为 90 天 mRS 评分 0 至 2 分和 ordinal mRS 分布。次要结局包括 90 天内卒中及其他血管事件风险,以及 24 小时内早期神经功能改善或恶化(分别为基线时 NIHSS 评分下降或增加≥2 分)。在 1373 例 MIS 患者中,240 例接受 IVT+DAPT 治疗的患者与 427 例接受 DAPT 单药治疗的患者相匹配。90 天时,IVT+DAPT 与 DAPT 单药治疗相比,mRS 0 至 2 分的频率相似(风险差异 2.3%[95%CI-2.0%至 6.7%];=0.295;风险比 1.03[95%CI 0.98-1.08];=0.312),但 ordinal mRS 评分分布更有利(比值比 0.57[95%CI 0.41-0.79];<0.001)。与 DAPT 单药治疗相比,联合 IVT 和 DAPT 治疗的患者 24 小时内早期神经功能改善的比例更高(风险差异 20.9%[95%CI 13.1%-28.6%];风险比 1.59[95%CI 1.34-1.89];均<0.001),90 天内卒中及其他血管事件风险较低(风险比 0.27[95%CI 0.08-0.90];=0.034)。安全性结局无差异。
根据这项观察性研究的结果,与 DAPT 单药治疗相比,联合 IVT 和 DAPT 治疗可能会改善 MIS 患者的功能结局,并降低复发性事件的风险,且不增加安全性担忧。