Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性脑卒中伴轻度非致残性神经功能缺损患者阿替普酶与阿司匹林治疗对功能结局的影响:PRISMS 随机临床试验。

Effect of Alteplase vs Aspirin on Functional Outcome for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Minor Nondisabling Neurologic Deficits: The PRISMS Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga.

出版信息

JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):156-166. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8496.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

More than half of patients with acute ischemic stroke have minor neurologic deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of 0-5) at presentation. Although prior major trials of alteplase included patients with low NIHSS scores, few without clearly disabling deficits were enrolled.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alteplase in patients with NIHSS scores of 0 to 5 whose deficits are not clearly disabling.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The PRISMS trial was designed as a 948-patient, phase 3b, double-blind, double-placebo, multicenter randomized clinical trial of alteplase compared with aspirin for emergent stroke at 75 stroke hospital networks in the United States. Patients with acute ischemic stroke whose deficits were scored as 0 to 5 on the NIHSS and judged not clearly disabling and in whom study treatment could be initiated within 3 hours of onset were eligible and enrolled from May 30, 2014, to December 20, 2016, with final follow-up on March 22, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to receive intravenous alteplase at the standard dose (0.9 mg/kg) with oral placebo (n = 156) or oral aspirin, 325 mg, with intravenous placebo (n = 157).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the difference in favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days via Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by pretreatment NIHSS score, age, and time from onset to treatment. Because of early termination of the trial, prior to unblinding or interim analyses, the plan was revised to examine the risk difference of the primary outcome by a linear model adjusted for the same factors. The primary safety end point was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours of intravenous study treatment.

RESULTS

Among 313 patients enrolled at 53 stroke networks (mean age, 62 [SD, 13] years; 144 [46%] women; median NIHSS score, 2 [interquartile range {IQR}, 1-3]; median time to treatment, 2.7 hours [IQR, 2.1-2.9]), 281 (89.8%) completed the trial. At 90 days, 122 patients (78.2%) in the alteplase group vs 128 (81.5%) in the aspirin group achieved a favorable outcome (adjusted risk difference, -1.1%; 95% CI, -9.4% to 7.3%). Five alteplase-treated patients (3.2%) vs 0 aspirin-treated patients had sICH (risk difference, 3.3%; 95% CI, 0.8%-7.4%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke, treatment with alteplase vs aspirin did not increase the likelihood of favorable functional outcome at 90 days. However, the very early study termination precludes any definitive conclusions, and additional research may be warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02072226.

摘要

重要性:超过一半的急性缺血性脑卒中患者在就诊时存在轻度神经功能缺损(国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分为 0-5)。尽管先前的阿替普酶主要临床试验纳入了 NIHSS 评分较低的患者,但很少有明确无致残性缺损的患者入组。

目的:评估阿替普酶治疗 NIHSS 评分为 0-5 分且缺损不明确无致残性的患者的疗效和安全性。

设计、设置和参与者:PRISMS 试验设计为一项 948 例患者、3b 期、双盲、双安慰剂、多中心随机临床试验,在美国 75 家卒中网络中比较了阿替普酶与阿司匹林治疗急性缺血性脑卒中,这些患者的 NIHSS 评分为 0-5 分,被判断为非明显致残性,且研究治疗可在发病后 3 小时内启动。患者于 2014 年 5 月 30 日至 2016 年 12 月 20 日入组,最终随访时间为 2017 年 3 月 22 日。

干预措施:参与者随机接受标准剂量(0.9mg/kg)的阿替普酶静脉注射加口服安慰剂(n=156)或口服阿司匹林 325mg 加静脉安慰剂(n=157)。

主要结局和测量:主要结局是 90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分(通过 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验,按预处理 NIHSS 评分、年龄和发病至治疗的时间分层)的差异,定义为 0 或 1 分。由于试验提前终止,在揭盲或中期分析之前,计划修订为通过调整 NIHSS 评分、年龄和发病至治疗时间的线性模型来检查主要结局的风险差异。主要安全性终点是 36 小时内静脉研究治疗后发生症状性颅内出血(sICH)。

结果:在 53 家卒中网络(平均年龄 62[标准差,13]岁;144[46%]名女性;中位数 NIHSS 评分 2[四分位距 {IQR},1-3];中位数治疗时间 2.7 小时[IQR,2.1-2.9])中,共纳入 313 例患者,其中 281 例(89.8%)完成了试验。90 天时,阿替普酶组 122 例(78.2%)患者 vs 阿司匹林组 128 例(81.5%)患者达到了良好结局(调整风险差异,-1.1%;95%CI,-9.4%至 7.3%)。阿替普酶治疗组 5 例(3.2%)患者 vs 阿司匹林治疗组 0 例患者发生 sICH(风险差异,3.3%;95%CI,0.8%-7.4%)。

结论和相关性:在轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,与阿司匹林相比,阿替普酶治疗并不能提高 90 天时的良好功能结局的可能性。然而,由于试验提前终止,无法得出任何明确的结论,可能需要进一步研究。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02072226。

相似文献

5
MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset.MRI 引导下的不明时间起病脑卒中溶栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 16;379(7):611-622. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804355. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke.NXY - 059用于急性缺血性卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):588-600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052980.

引用本文的文献

9
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: development and update.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:进展与更新
Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 28;7(3):fcaf164. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf164. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验