University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga.
JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):156-166. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8496.
More than half of patients with acute ischemic stroke have minor neurologic deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of 0-5) at presentation. Although prior major trials of alteplase included patients with low NIHSS scores, few without clearly disabling deficits were enrolled.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alteplase in patients with NIHSS scores of 0 to 5 whose deficits are not clearly disabling.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The PRISMS trial was designed as a 948-patient, phase 3b, double-blind, double-placebo, multicenter randomized clinical trial of alteplase compared with aspirin for emergent stroke at 75 stroke hospital networks in the United States. Patients with acute ischemic stroke whose deficits were scored as 0 to 5 on the NIHSS and judged not clearly disabling and in whom study treatment could be initiated within 3 hours of onset were eligible and enrolled from May 30, 2014, to December 20, 2016, with final follow-up on March 22, 2017.
Participants were randomized to receive intravenous alteplase at the standard dose (0.9 mg/kg) with oral placebo (n = 156) or oral aspirin, 325 mg, with intravenous placebo (n = 157).
The primary outcome was the difference in favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days via Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by pretreatment NIHSS score, age, and time from onset to treatment. Because of early termination of the trial, prior to unblinding or interim analyses, the plan was revised to examine the risk difference of the primary outcome by a linear model adjusted for the same factors. The primary safety end point was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours of intravenous study treatment.
Among 313 patients enrolled at 53 stroke networks (mean age, 62 [SD, 13] years; 144 [46%] women; median NIHSS score, 2 [interquartile range {IQR}, 1-3]; median time to treatment, 2.7 hours [IQR, 2.1-2.9]), 281 (89.8%) completed the trial. At 90 days, 122 patients (78.2%) in the alteplase group vs 128 (81.5%) in the aspirin group achieved a favorable outcome (adjusted risk difference, -1.1%; 95% CI, -9.4% to 7.3%). Five alteplase-treated patients (3.2%) vs 0 aspirin-treated patients had sICH (risk difference, 3.3%; 95% CI, 0.8%-7.4%).
Among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke, treatment with alteplase vs aspirin did not increase the likelihood of favorable functional outcome at 90 days. However, the very early study termination precludes any definitive conclusions, and additional research may be warranted.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02072226.
重要性:超过一半的急性缺血性脑卒中患者在就诊时存在轻度神经功能缺损(国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分为 0-5)。尽管先前的阿替普酶主要临床试验纳入了 NIHSS 评分较低的患者,但很少有明确无致残性缺损的患者入组。
目的:评估阿替普酶治疗 NIHSS 评分为 0-5 分且缺损不明确无致残性的患者的疗效和安全性。
设计、设置和参与者:PRISMS 试验设计为一项 948 例患者、3b 期、双盲、双安慰剂、多中心随机临床试验,在美国 75 家卒中网络中比较了阿替普酶与阿司匹林治疗急性缺血性脑卒中,这些患者的 NIHSS 评分为 0-5 分,被判断为非明显致残性,且研究治疗可在发病后 3 小时内启动。患者于 2014 年 5 月 30 日至 2016 年 12 月 20 日入组,最终随访时间为 2017 年 3 月 22 日。
干预措施:参与者随机接受标准剂量(0.9mg/kg)的阿替普酶静脉注射加口服安慰剂(n=156)或口服阿司匹林 325mg 加静脉安慰剂(n=157)。
主要结局和测量:主要结局是 90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分(通过 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验,按预处理 NIHSS 评分、年龄和发病至治疗的时间分层)的差异,定义为 0 或 1 分。由于试验提前终止,在揭盲或中期分析之前,计划修订为通过调整 NIHSS 评分、年龄和发病至治疗时间的线性模型来检查主要结局的风险差异。主要安全性终点是 36 小时内静脉研究治疗后发生症状性颅内出血(sICH)。
结果:在 53 家卒中网络(平均年龄 62[标准差,13]岁;144[46%]名女性;中位数 NIHSS 评分 2[四分位距 {IQR},1-3];中位数治疗时间 2.7 小时[IQR,2.1-2.9])中,共纳入 313 例患者,其中 281 例(89.8%)完成了试验。90 天时,阿替普酶组 122 例(78.2%)患者 vs 阿司匹林组 128 例(81.5%)患者达到了良好结局(调整风险差异,-1.1%;95%CI,-9.4%至 7.3%)。阿替普酶治疗组 5 例(3.2%)患者 vs 阿司匹林治疗组 0 例患者发生 sICH(风险差异,3.3%;95%CI,0.8%-7.4%)。
结论和相关性:在轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,与阿司匹林相比,阿替普酶治疗并不能提高 90 天时的良好功能结局的可能性。然而,由于试验提前终止,无法得出任何明确的结论,可能需要进一步研究。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02072226。