Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 612 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
Department of Neurology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan, 523573, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Oct;57(7):1172-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03032-8. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) have been widely used in minor ischemic stroke (MIS) treatment. However, the clinical outcomes and safety of these two treatments have not been compared within the early thrombolytic time window. Here, we conducted a multicenter, ambispective cohort study involving patients with MIS presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset at 3 affiliated hospitals of Jinan University from 2018-2022. The patients were divided into the IVT group and DAPT group. The primary outcome was a 90-day excellent outcome (mRS ≤ 1). A total of 1,026 patients were enrolled, of whom 492 were assigned to the IVT group and 534 were assigned to the DAPT group. The IVT group had better 90-day excellent outcomes (mRS ≤ 1) than the DAPT group (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.14-2.52, P = 0.010). Among the 623 patients with nondisabling stroke, the proportion of mRS ≤ 1 in the IVT group was higher than the DAPT group (P = 0.009). In the subtypes of MIS with large vessel occlusion/stenosis and with isolated symptoms, the 90-day outcomes of the IVT group and DAPT group were not different (P > 0.05). In conclusion, compared with DAPT, IVT was associated with better 90-day clinical outcomes in patients with MIS (in particular, for those with mRS > 1), including earlier clinical improvement.IVT also benefited the early neurological improvement of patients with severe stenosis/occlusion of intracranial large vessels, nondisabling mild stroke, nondisabling mild stroke with isolated symptoms.
静脉溶栓 (IVT) 和双联抗血小板治疗 (DAPT) 已广泛应用于小缺血性卒中 (MIS) 的治疗。然而,这两种治疗方法在早期溶栓时间窗内的临床结局和安全性尚未得到比较。在这里,我们进行了一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究,纳入了 2018 年至 2022 年期间在暨南大学附属 3 家医院发病 4.5 小时内的 MIS 患者。患者分为 IVT 组和 DAPT 组。主要结局是 90 天的良好结局 (mRS≤1)。共纳入 1026 例患者,其中 492 例分配至 IVT 组,534 例分配至 DAPT 组。IVT 组的 90 天良好结局 (mRS≤1) 优于 DAPT 组 (OR 1.69,95%CI 1.14-2.52,P=0.010)。在 623 例非致残性卒中患者中,IVT 组 mRS≤1 的比例高于 DAPT 组 (P=0.009)。在 MIS 大血管闭塞/狭窄和孤立症状的亚型中,IVT 组和 DAPT 组的 90 天结局没有差异 (P>0.05)。总之,与 DAPT 相比,IVT 与 MIS 患者的 90 天临床结局更好 (特别是对于 mRS>1 的患者),包括更早的临床改善。IVT 还使颅内大血管严重狭窄/闭塞、非致残性轻度卒中、孤立症状的非致残性轻度卒中患者的早期神经功能改善受益。